Western wildfires straining resources

Tracy Greenwood embraces her daughter, Mariah Greenwood, as they watch the High Park wildfire burn near their home west of Fort Collins, Colo., on Monday, June 11, 2012. / AP Photo

(AP) BELLVUE, Colo. - Massive wildfires in drought-parched Colorado and New Mexico tested the resources of state and federal crews Monday and underscored the need to replenish an aging U.S. aerial firefighting fleet needed to combat a year-round fire season.

Wyoming diverted personnel and aircraft from two fires there to help with a 60-square-mile wildfire in northern Colorado. Canada also loaned two aerial bombers to fight the Colorado blaze following the recent crash of a U.S. tanker in Utah. And an elite federal firefighting crew arrived to try to begin containing a fire that destroyed at least 118 structures.

All told, about 600 firefighters will be battling the fire some 15 miles west of Fort Collins by Tuesday, said incident commander Bill Hahnenberg. "We are a very high priority nationally. We can get all the resources we want and need," he said.

The U.S. Forest Service said late Monday it would add more aircraft to its aerial firefighting fleet, contracting one air tanker from the state of Alaska and four from Canada. Two more air tankers were being activated in California.

The announcement came after Colorado's U.S. House congressional delegation demanded that the agency deploy more resources to the fire, which was zero percent contained and forced hundreds of people to abandon their homes. The Larimer County Sheriff's Office said it confirmed one person died in the fire — but did not say whether the victim was a person previously reported missing.

Rapidly spreading wildfires choke Colo., N.M.
Dangerous Colo. wildfire burns, threatens homes
Hundreds evacuated as Colo., N.M. wildfires grow

In a letter to the Forest Service, Colorado's congressmen said the need for firefighting aircraft was "dire." Colorado U.S. Sen. Mark Udall urged President Barack Obama to sign legislation that would allow the Forest Service to contract at least seven large air tankers to add to its fleet of 13 — which includes the two on loan from Canada.

The temporary additions to the firefighting aircraft fleet will make 17 air tankers available to the forest service, which has deployed 10 air tankers, 62 helicopters and 4,000 personnel to more than 100 fires nationwide.

One of the region's most potent aerial firefighting forces — two Wyoming Air National Guard C-130s fitted to drop slurry — sat on a runway in Cheyenne, 50 miles north of the Colorado fire. The reason: The Forest Service, by law, cannot call for military resources until it deems that its fleet is fully busy. It also takes 36 hours to mobilize the crews and planes, officials said.

"They just haven't thrown the switch yet because they feel like there are adequate resources available," said Mike Ferris, a spokesman for the National Interagency Fire Center in Boise, Idaho.

(At left, watch CBS Evening News correspondent Barry Peterson's report on the rapidly spreading Colorado wildfire.)

Colorado was using five of 13 air tankers available nationally, said Forest Service spokesman Steve Segin.

Meanwhile, helicopters were used to suck water from a reservoir and drop it on nearby homes dangerously close to the flames.

Evacuees expressed gratitude for the help.

"They're doing the best they can," said Barb Hermsen as she watched a helicopter make daring raids through smoke and flame to protect homes. "We know how much they have to go through, and where they're going — man, it's crazy."

Smoke billows from the Little Bear fire in southeastern New Mexico near Ruidoso, Saturday, June 9, 2012.

/ AP Photo

In New Mexico, firefighters got new air and ground support to battle a fast-moving wildfire that charred tens of thousands of acres and forced hundreds of residents to leave their homes in the southern part of the state.

Smoke filled the air in the mountain community of Ruidoso as evacuees gathered at a high school gymnasium to get an update on the lightning-sparked fire in the Sierra Blanca mountain range. The blaze exploded over the weekend and reached more than 54 square miles by Monday.

An estimated 35 structures have been damaged or destroyed by the blaze, and fire managers expect that number to grow once damage assessments are done.

Elsewhere in New Mexico, firefighters made slow progress against the largest wildfire in state history. The blaze has charred 435 square miles of forest since it was sparked by lightning in mid-May, and was 37 percent contained Monday.

Arizona's state forestry division dispatched two water tenders and 15 fire trucks to New Mexico, which also welcomed the arrival of a DC-10 jetliner that can lay a 100-yard-wide, mile-long line of retardant or water.

Fire bosses in New Mexico and Arizona ordered more elite crews, engines and air support from the Southwest Coordination Center in Albuquerque, where director Kenan Jaycox said resources are approaching full capacity.

"It's a balancing game," Jaycox said.

At least 18 large wildfires are burning in nine U.S. states, forcing the reshuffling of fire crews and aircraft. The National Interagency Fire Center in Boise, Idaho, said 4,000 of 15,000 federal firefighters are currently deployed at fires around the country.

Because aircraft had been scarce, federal fire managers asked Wyoming to send National Guard helicopters to a 6-square-mile wildfire in Guernsey State Park. In nearby Medicine Bow National Forest, crews containing a 13-square-mile fire sent air support to Colorado.

Forest Service Chief Tom Tidwell has long insisted the federal government has enough resources to respond to a year-round wildfire season driven by drought, heat, decades of fighting forest fires rather than letting them run their natural course, and bark beetle pine tree kill.

"We have enough resources at this time to be able to deal with the fires we currently are dealing with and what we expect to have to deal with the rest of this fire season," Tidwell told The Associated Press last week. He emphasized that the agency has the authority to transfer funds from other accounts to meet firefighting costs in any given year.

Some 1,459 square miles have burned across the country this year — less than the same period in 2011, when 6,327 square miles burned.

Flames from the High Park Fire burn northwest of Fort Collins, Colo., Sunday, June 10, 2012.

/ CBS

[tvwatcher5345]

we got too many firefighters, romney is right they are milking the system, i don't want to pay anymore taxes for them. outsource the fire department, use volunteer firefighters, or have people pay for the service .......simple

[endrepubs]

Remember when you go to the polls in November, that our Republican friends among us (Romney included) think we have too many firefighters already. They think we spend too much Federal money on government things like aerial fleets of firefighting planes even though this article clearly explains that our fleet is too old and not enough. I guess the Republican answer is to let it burn or maybe they think a magically appearing private firm will put the fires out!

[tmittelstaed]

As long as the homeowners followed the requirements to clear brush 100 feet from the walls of their homes then I see nothing wrong with trying to save their homes.

But far too often this is not the case.

If fires were allowed to burn naturally every year, and homeowners followed the 100 foot rule then few to no homes would be lost because the fires would be low intensity. The fires would not kill healthy trees.

But these fires are due to overeager fire suppression and that is usually the result of a lot of homeowners who don't follow the rules and clear brush and trees, and put political pressure on governments to fight every fire. Then underbrush builds up until you get these killer fires. These killer fires also end up killing healthy trees because they are so hot. Then you end up with no forest left and a bunch of weeds and grass which present even worse fire danger. And you cannot stop the killer fires and they end up destroying even the homes where they followed the rules.

I feel sorry for the homeowners but they wouldn't have lost their homes if they had pushed for low intensity controlled burns during the wet season. This has been known for the last 20 years and anyone buying a woodland home should know better.

[Fed-Up_Patriot]

Thank you Canada for all that you do. Loaning the tankers is just one more example of many. We Americans see and are always thankful. What better neighbors could we ask for.

[kbbpll]

The three posts below are the most ignorant I've ever read.

[retiredgustav]

You are correct about that. No matter where one lives some kind of natural disaster can happen. It is up to "we the people" help those afflicted to rebuild their lives.

[lami987]

The best solution is to just let it burn and in other areas let it flood. We should create a society where every one is on his/her own. That society is coming.

[retiredgustav]

Put Romney and his goons in it will happen quicker that you think.

[Major_Variola_]

Fires are natural. Homes in woodlands are stupid. Why do we pay for their protection?

We see this in Calif. yearly.

And the longer you suppress fires, the stronger they are when they break out.

But firefighting is a form of welfare.
Let it burn.

[sdemaggie]

What is this costing We the People to fight? Is it possible it's cheaper for We the People to let it burn? This has gotta be running 100's of thousands an hour to fight. Let it burn.

[rharrin1]

We need to cut taxes again, then it wouldn't cost anything.