CBS/AP/ June 11, 2012, 7:25 PM

Sandusky accuser recounts abuse, "creepy" letters

Last updated 5:30pm ET

(CBS/AP) BELLEFONTE, Pa. - The first witness in Jerry Sandusky's trial said the former Penn State assistant football coach sexually abused him as a young teenager on campus and in hotels and later sent him "creepy love letters."

The witness, dubbed Victim No. 4 by prosecutors, said what began as "soap battles" in the shower escalated into inappropriate touching and oral sex. He said under cross-examination that he feels responsible for what happened to other alleged victims because he didn't come forward earlier.

The man, now 28, was the first of eight alleged victims expected to testify during the trial, which began Monday with opening statements.

In this courtroom sketch, Jerry Sandusky listens to opening statements during the first day of his child sexual abuse trial in Bellefonte, Pa., June 11, 2012.

/ AP Photo/Aggie Kenny

Sandusky faces 52 criminal counts that he sexually abused 10 boys over 15 years, allegations he has denied. His arrest and the fallout led to departures of longtime football coach Joe Paterno and the university president.

The trial is expected to last several weeks. CBS News' Armen Keteyian reports that Sandusky's attorney says Sandusky will testify in his own defense.

Lead prosecutor Joseph McGettigan III opened Sandusky's highly anticipated trial Monday by telling jurors that the 68-year-old retired coach was a pedophile who took advantage of fatherless children or those with unstable home lives, plied them with gifts and sexually abused them for years.

Defense lawyer Joseph Amendola countered that some of the alleged victims had hired civil lawyers and had a financial interest in pursuing the criminal case.

Complete coverage of the Jerry Sandusky trial
Prosecutors call Sandusky a predator; defense aims at accusers
Sandusky jury heavy on Penn State ties

Sandusky sat still as the first witness explained that he began showering with the former assistant coach in 1997, when he would have been about 13 years old. The man said he had met Sandusky through The Second Mile, the children's charity the assistant coach had founded.

The witness spoke calmly and firmly when questioned by McGettigan. Wearing a white shirt, dark tie and dark pants, he looked straight ahead at McGettigan during questioning. He gestured at times when asked to describe interactions with Sandusky.

"He would put his hand on my leg, basically like I was his girlfriend ... it freaked me out extremely bad," the man said, extending his right arm out and pushing it back and forth.

"I pushed it away ... after a little while, it would come right back. That drove me nuts," he said.

Instances in the shower, the man testified, escalated to the point where either Sandusky maneuvered himself so his head would be near the boy's genitals, or vice versa. The man testified that there were "a few occasions" where Sandusky ejaculated in the Penn State locker room showers.

Pictures of Sandusky and the then-boy were shown at times on a video screen. The man was asked to identify photos handed to him by McGettigan, including those with Penn State football players, but rarely looked over when the pictures were displayed on a screen large enough for jurors to see.

A self-described college football fan, the man said he enjoyed the access to Penn State football games and facilities. At one point, the man said, Sandusky let him wear the No. 11 uniform of LaVar Arrington. Prosecutors also showed a picture of the man, as a boy, with Arrington.

The alleged victim said that he even though he weighed barely 100 pounds at the time, Sandusky led him to believe he had a shot to eventually earn a spot on the Penn State football team, CBS News' Josh Gaynor reports.

"I still believed maybe I'd be a wide receiver or field goal kicker," the man said.

The man testified that Sandusky also took him to bowl trips including the Outback and Alamo bowls. He also gave him golf clubs, snowboards, drum sets and various Penn state memorabilia including a watch from the Orange Bowl, the man testified. He said he would wear gift jerseys to school.

The man said he stayed either at his mother's or grandmother's home at times. He never told his grandmother.

"No, no way. I was too scared to ... The other things were nice. I didn't want to lose that," he testified.

The witness said that, as he got older and after he got a girlfriend, he was "basically getting sick about what was happening to me."

He testified to one alleged interaction before a bowl game banquet in Texas, in a hotel bathroom before taking a shower, that Sandusky pushed down on him in a "downward motion."

The man said he resisted, when he testified that Sandusky responded, "You don't want to go back (home), do you?"

Asked by McGettigan to clarify, the man said "that he was trying to get me to have oral sex, and threatening me if not."

He said about 10 seconds later, Sandusky's wife, Dottie, called out from another room, and that an apparently surprised Sandusky left the bathroom.

Sandusky also sent the man letters, he testified. One shown briefly on a video screen in court was a handwritten on Penn State letterhead, signed "Jerry"

"I know that I have made my share of mistakes," the letter read. "However I hope that I will be able to say that I cared. There has been love in my heart."

The man described some of the correspondence as "creepy love letters ... Others would be, `Hey, do you want to come to a football game?' Those kinds of things."

Under cross-examination, the man said he was reluctant to cooperate with the investigation into Sandusky. He also said he had spent years "burying this in the back of my head."

"I thought I was the only person," he said. "I just came to terms with that and just wanted to go away."

Amendola also asked the man why he wasn't more forceful in shunning Sandusky earlier, and the witness replied that he didn't want to raise suspicion that might result if he cut ties suddenly.

He also expressed remorse, saying, "I feel if I just said something back then ... I feel responsible for what happened to other victims."

Amendola also pointed to a series of behavior contracts signed by both the witness and Sandusky. One such contract promised the witness money for post-high school education in exchange for participating in soccer, hockey, golf, as well getting grades no lower than a C and having no suspensions.

"Clearly this is a contract for me to be around him more often. There's even a part in there for me to come over to exercise with him three times a week," the man said, shrugging his shoulders.

During his opening statement, McGettigan told jurors he would prove that the abuse included oral and anal sex involving boys Sandusky met through The Second Mile and that it took place "not over days, not over weeks, not even over months, but in some cases over years."

McGettigan called The Second Mile, which Sandusky established in 1977, the "perfect environment for the predatory pedophile" and his way to get close to his victims.

Amendola said the young men who would take the stand were accusers, not victims. He said jurors may find it odd that Sandusky showered with children, but that it was innocuous, and part of Sandusky's upbringing.

"In Jerry's culture, growing up in his generation, where he grew up, he's going to tell you it was routine for individuals to get showers together," Amendola said. "I suspect for those of you who might have been in athletics, it's routine."

Amendola said the defense will argue that Mike McQueary, the football team assistant who reported seeing Sandusky naked in a shower in 2001, was mistaken about what he saw.

"We don't think Michael McQueary lied," Amendola told jurors. "Are you surprised? We don't think that he lied. What we think is that he saw something and made assumptions."

Amendola also told jurors that at least six of the alleged victims have civil lawyers, including several in the courtroom gallery on Monday.

"These young men had a financial interest in this case and pursuing this case," Amendola said.

The first witness, speaking calmly but forcefully in progressively tense questioning from Amendola, said he has never had any discussion about a civil suit.

He also testified that he hadn't had financial difficulties the last several years and that he didn't personally know other alleged accusers.

© 2012 CBS Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. The Associated Press contributed to this report.
49 Comments Add a Comment
linkicon reporticon emailicon
boocbsboooooooooo says:
Lets just warp this guy back to the 1800's. Gets caught with a boy with a guy wearing a 6 shooter. They throw him in jail for a week and put him on trial. He's found guilty and hanged immediately. No lawyers to feed. No unions in the prison system to feed. No crazy politically correct media to sensationalize a sicko. 10 people said he did it, and we're trying to figure if he's guilty or not. Sick society we live in. In a real world this guy would have been executed long ago. Nope, not in America, the land where the legal system is no deterrent for the barbarians.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
thoughtxchange2 says:
This guy is a total freakshow. Amazing how his lawyers can only say these people are interested in money. Obviously not good enough. If it was 1 person bringing these charges against him they could try that statement. But there are 10! So nasty. The thought of this old nasty man seducing these young and vulnerable boys when he was in the position of power is sickening. He makes me want to projectle vomit everytime I see his freakshow face. I hope he gets whats coming to him in jail. You wanted to do some effing Jerry- you are about to get it from some prison inmates. I hope you become the prey just like the children you preyed on. It's your turn to see how it feels to be the one without any power.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
smittyc says:
The jury and its alternates include a current Penn State Professor Casarey, 24 years with Penn State U., a former professor, a current Penn State student, Penn State season ticket holders. Draw your own conclusions.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
ReckonedTruth says:
here we go..the naysayers in defense of this pedophile child rapist ..you PPL amaze me.. and then we wonder how this sort of thing continues to happen in AMERICA.. WHEN AUTHORTIES had plenty of complaints and DID NOTHING.. THAT'S the bigger issue in all of this for me.

And another interesting issue to be discovered.. is WHO these child victims were at the time and over the years that SANDUSKY molested.. the information is out there if you know where to look.. I was surprized and would have never guessed..that he would appear to target his victims ..
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
jhimelick says:
just put him in a room with Magnotta and be done with it...
reply
themanfrombrum replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
No, Hannibal Lecter!
linkicon reporticon emailicon
WakeUpPeople001 says:
Why did Sandusky get "house arrest"? Because everyone knows that he will be found guilty, and once he gets imprisoned, he's a dead man.
reply
1pheasant1 replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
There are bound to be a few jurors that will feel it is more important to protect their beloved university. They are...Penn State!

The commonwealth's laws are designed to provide this protection.
linkicon reporticon emailicon
fredisalive says:
FalseAccusations, we know there are many twisted folks like you who prey on children but let me tell you weirdo, your days are numbered!
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Jaylah54100 says:
I think a few of the commenters here have either forgotten or chosen to ignore the fact that the witnesses haven't been charged with any crime, and are not on trial. As much as you wish they were.
reply
Damoestpete replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Actually, their credibility is on trial, if they can't convince the jury, Jerry walks.
jhimelick replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
@Damoestpete..if he does, wanna bet he don't get very far?
linkicon reporticon emailicon
FalseAccusations says:
This corrupted show trial is already revealing it's true nature. A coached accuser spouting nothing more than hearsay of common situations and scenarios exaggerated to form the basis for presumed guilt with zero material fact or witness to support. Permitting an accuser to "testify" to his own accusation? There is a HUGE difference between valid witness testimony and the expansion and elaboration of an accusation. This isn't "testimony", it's the "accusation" all dressed up for show. False and inadmissable.
reply
Jaylah54100 replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
How do you explain the love letters?
Jaylah54100 replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Since you "know" so much about this, why aren't you appearing at the trial as a witness for the defense?
See all 4 Replies
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Tim2710 says:
With "creepy letters in the article title, where is an example of a creepy letter?

The couple of short excerpts included don't seem creepy.

The performance contracts also don't seem to be suspicious. How did "participating in soccer, hockey, golf, as well getting grades no lower than a C and having no suspensions" require the boy to be around Sandusky?

Did the boy fulfill any of those performance contracts and get the money?
reply
FalseAccusations replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Good points/questions.
Lisars12 replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Creepy might be the wrong word. I will say that it is a VERY odd letter for a grown man to send to a child. Or, maybe it seemed creepy to the child because he knew what was behind the letter.
See all 49 Comments
Scroll Left Scroll Right