AP/ May 30, 2012, 11:49 AM

Foie gras feeding frenzy grows as Calif. ban nears

Chef and owner Josiah Slone, right, prepares a foie gras dish at Sent Sovi, May 11, 2012 in Saratoga, Calif.

Chef and owner Josiah Slone, right, prepares a foie gras dish at Sent Sovi, May 11, 2012 in Saratoga, Calif. / AP Photo/Marcio Jose Sanchez

(AP) This is not a good time to be a duck with a fatty liver in California, though better times lie just ahead.

Chefs are loading their high-end menus with duck liver: terrine de foie gras, seared foie gras with mango chutney, foie gras salad and sweet foie gras for dessert. And they are keeping secret the locations of their multi-course dinners to avoid protesters as a July 1 ban looms in California, the only state to outlaw foie gras.

Demand for the delicacy created by force-feeding ducks through funnel-like tubes has never been higher as diners sate their palates with a product that soon will be banned for production and sale in the Golden State.

"The price has doubled. People are finding it hard to get it because the demand is so high," said Tracy Lee of the San Jose-based traveling dining service Dishcrawl, which has organized a series of 15 secret, sold-out foie gras dinners. Her last one is Thursday.

Calif. chefs seek repeal of looming foie gras ban

While gourmands stockpile foie gras at $60 a pound, others are stomaching the frenetic food fest with disdain.

"High-end foodies and chefs stuffing down their throats excessive amounts of fatty liver from force-fed ducks in the run-up to the ban paint a pretty ironic picture," said Jennifer Fearing of the Humane Society of the United States.

As the California foie gras feeding frenzy escalates, protesters in San Francisco and Los Angeles are staking out restaurants and even making reservations to tie up seats at dinners they know they'll never attend.

"Many people don't know what foie gras is or how it's produced and they're horrified when we tell them," said Dana Portnoy, who shot undercover video inside a foie gras operation and organizes the San Francisco-area protests. "Occasionally we'll run into antagonistic patrons, but that's usually when we're protesting at the foie gras benefit dinners."

It's why Lee doesn't publicize the restaurants where her dinners will be held until a day before the date.

"So far we haven't had any protesters, which has been nice," she said.

The California legislature gave the state's only producer, Sonoma Artisan Foie Gras, more than seven years to come up with a cruelty-free way to fatten the duck's liver when in 2004 it voted in the ban on producing and selling foie gras. Absent that, a coalition of chefs have mounted a lobbying campaign to try to overturn the law in the future, and the foie gras dinners are funding that ongoing effort.

To the oohs and aaahs of about 30 diners, Chef Josiah Slone hosted a recent seven-course foie gras feast at his Sent Sovi restaurant in Saratoga. He started with arugula with foie gras vinaigrette, moved to foie gras mousse with tartufata and English peas and seared foie gras with savory rhubarb pie. For dessert: foie, peanut butter and chocolate.

"For me, it was more of an educational dinner to talk a little about how foie gras is produced and the science behind how it's produced," Slone said. "Yes there are two sides to it, but understanding the line between science and emotion is very important for people."

There are enough "quality ingredients out there" that his California-French menu won't be lacking when it's gone, Slone said. As someone who goes to extreme measures to source quality meat and vegetables, he thinks animal welfare advocates could end more suffering if they'd focus on practices at large confined animal farming operations producing beef, chicken and pork.

"I think the issue that the animal rights people have is a lot bigger than foie gras," Slone said. "Foie gras was sort of an easy target, sort of low-hanging fruit. But in the sense of improving conditions of animal welfare, ending some of the factory farming practices that big ag is defending is a very admirable goal."

The California ban, which maintains that over-feeding ducks using a pipe stuffed down the esophagus is cruel, comes as four animal welfare groups filed a lawsuit against the U.S. Department of Agriculture last month, making another point about foie gras. They hope to secure a national prohibition by arguing that USDA is violating the Poultry Products Inspection Act by allowing "diseased birds" to enter the food chain.

Foie gras — French for "fatty liver" — is made from liver swollen to 10 times its normal size, which the lawsuit argues is acute hepatic lipidosis, a condition linked to obesity in animals. Ducks' livers become so engorged by the feeding process called "gavage" that the birds can't walk and have trouble breathing.

Gavage has been outlawed in a dozen countries including Israel, the Czech Republic, Denmark, Finland, Switzerland and the United Kingdom.

© 2012 The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
57 Comments Add a Comment
linkicon reporticon emailicon
BantheScan says:
I don't find animal cruelty appetizing. It is one thing to humanely kill and eat an animal, it is another to torture and disease it.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8IWN8UGDyC0
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
nohater says:
a chef with long hair preparing food for customers and not wearing a chef's hat or a hair net? that's gross. the man in the background has at least shaved his head.
reply
BantheScan replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
It is one thing to eat an animal that is humanely killed, foie gras involves torturing an animal until it is so sick it is diseased. If you'd like to learn more you can watch this video about it.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8IWN8UGDyC0
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Grizzlyironbear says:
While I personally detest the idea of eating fatty goose and duck liver, I find it quite amusing at the arguments posted here. On one side you have the people that point fingers at everyone, calling them gross and inhumane. They seem to be the most outspoken of the sides as well. AND the least informed. On the other side the ones that don't seem to have a problem with the food act, well, more mature and intelligent. Bottom line folks, your opinions aren't going to change the world, no matter what you say or how loudly you say it. Next time you find something "disgusting" and "horrible", take a look at the rest of the products you use on a daily basis before you shame someone else. You would be surprised at what you find.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
fitstshu says:
I get a kick out of converatives on here saying that this is a liberal thing. Remember when they hated every thing French?
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
4780 says:
I say let people eat this trash so they help out the medical industry by having heart problems. Foodies and chefs sure do like to push garbage food down peoples throats.
reply
two-cats replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
My sentiments exactly. It is a disgusting food both in taste and in preparation.
linkicon reporticon emailicon
fcukmaobama says:
Swirling Santorum around is a filthy disgusting practice, but we legislate to protect it?

Following the money, this is just to jack the price. You can get the same result by just offing more ducks.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
hypnotoad72 says:
What, people choose to whine instead of getting their own ducks to squish that foie gras out of?
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
hillbillyvol says:
I'll take a nice flank steak from a dog myself. Really delicious and under-appreciated. We need to open up about the other red meat.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Animationman333 says:
I've had fois gras, and yes, it's delicious. But the fact is, we have plenty of other things we can eat instead.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Lerianis4 says:
I don't understand why this ban is not being challenged in federal court on Constitutional grounds. Foie Gras is a cultural dish that has been around for CENTURIES.

I'm thinking we have a bunch of whiny babies today who when they dislike something, think that they have the right to dictate to that other person that they shouldn't do or eat that thing in question.
reply
sma_LA replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
There are many things that were culturally accepted at one time that no longer are.
A sense of humanity to things does not make someone whiny.
Presuming your argument, if I had a tremendous desire to beat you, wouldn't it be my right, and nobody should infringe upon my right?
Ddogowar replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
What's really surprising is that this liberal, pussified state of CA is the LAST state to ban this practice. Perhaps YOU don't understand that it isn't about telling you what you can eat....it's about telling you that you can't stuff a tube down a duck's throat to fatten its liver and make it sick so that you can eat it (however sick that may or may not be). You probably voted against smoking and marijuana too....didn't you?!
See all 5 Replies
See all 57 Comments