AP/ May 24, 2012, 11:01 PM

NJ official: NYPD Muslim surveillance legal

Imam Mustafa El-Amin holds a Quran that he plans to give to New Jersey Attorney General Jeffrey S. Chiesa at a meeting with religious leaders in Trenton, N.J., May 24, 2012.

Imam Mustafa El-Amin holds a Quran that he plans to give to New Jersey Attorney General Jeffrey S. Chiesa at a meeting with religious leaders in Trenton, N.J., May 24, 2012. / AP Photo/Mel Evans

(AP) TRENTON, N.J. - New York City police did not violate New Jersey laws when they conducted surveillance of Muslim businesses, mosques and student groups, Gov. Chris Christie's administration said Thursday following a three-month review, a finding that angered Muslim leaders who had sought a clampdown on the cross-border police operations.

The conclusion by Attorney General Jeffrey S. Chiesa, a Christie appointee asked by the governor to look into the spying, means New Jersey Muslims have no state recourse to stop the New York Police Department from infiltrating student groups, videotaping mosque-goers or collecting their license plate numbers as they pray.

Such operations were part of a widespread NYPD program to collect intelligence on Muslim communities both inside New York and beyond. Undercover officers and informants eavesdropped in Muslim cafes and monitored sermons, even when there was no evidence of a crime. The result was that many innocent business owners, students and others were cataloged in police files.

The interstate surveillance efforts, revealed by The Associated Press earlier this year, angered many Muslims and New Jersey officials. Some, like Newark Mayor Cory Booker and the state's top FBI official, criticized the tactics. Others, like Christie, focused more on the fact that the NYPD didn't tell New Jersey exactly what it was up to.

In response, Chiesa launched what he described as a fact-finding review. That review concluded that the NYPD's operations violated no state laws, either civil or criminal.

Further, authorities found that New Jersey has no laws barring outside law enforcement agencies from secretly conducting operations in the state, representatives of the attorney general's office told the AP. However, New York police have agreed to meet with New Jersey law enforcement regularly to discuss counterterrorism intelligence and operations, the attorney general said.

Chiesa, the governor's former chief counsel and a longtime confidante, outlined the state's findings in closed-door meetings Thursday afternoon with Muslim leaders.

"We remain committed to striking the appropriate balance of ensuring the safety of our citizens through vigilance in fighting terrorism, while not undermining the public's confidence in how we approach that mission," Chiesa said in a written statement.

Muslim leaders said they were told that every instance of NYPD activity in New Jersey had been justified by a lead, but that the attorney general would not provide any details on the nature of any of those leads, saying the fact-finding was ongoing.

They said that they did not find the assertion credible and that their efforts to maintain communication between the community and law enforcement would be hurt by the findings that the NYPD had done nothing wrong — and could keep doing what they have been doing.

"It was basically an, `FYI, good Thursday afternoon, let it die in the media before the Memorial Day weekend,"' said Mohamed El-Filali, executive director of the Islamic Center of Passaic County, across the Hudson River from New York. If the surveillance of every mosque, burger joint and barbershop targeted was justified, he asked, why were no arrests made?

Aref Assaf of the American Arab Forum said the attorney general made them feel like second-class citizens.

"I said to him it's not only insulting, it's offensive to our sense of justice, that you bring us to Trenton to tell us that you accept as legal and valid the actions of the NYPD, and I will not be surprised if you're issuing an order informing your law enforcement officials that they too can spy on American Muslisms because if it's legal for NYPD, than it must be legal for NJ to do the same."

The Muslim leaders said they would consider all legal options, including renewed appeals for action by the U.S. Justice Department. A federal civil rights lawsuit has also been considered.

The governor was not at the meetings. He was on a visit at the same time to Atlantic City. Asked about the findings, he said: "I have every confidence in Attorney General Chiesa. If that's what he determined, it's good enough for me."

The NYPD has long maintained that its operations were lawful and necessary to keep the city safe. New York Mayor Michael Bloomberg says the NYPD can gather intelligence anywhere in the country it wants and is not required to tell local authorities. NYPD lawyers say they are not bound by jurisdictional lines because they are just collecting intelligence, not making arrests or otherwise acting as police.

Told of New Jersey's findings, Bloomberg's spokesman, Marc La Vorgna, said in a statement: "We've said it time and again, NYPD has kept the city safe and they conduct their work legally."

The attorney general said a directive he issued requires all New Jersey law enforcement agencies to notify the New Jersey State Police Counter-Terrorism Bureau and the Office of Homeland Security and Preparedness if they hear of outside departments working in New Jersey. The state agencies will then coordinate with the Joint Terrorism Task Force, of which the NYPD is a member.

Chiesa said he is also establishing a Muslim outreach committee.

Christie, who was the U.S. attorney for the state at the time of the New Jersey surveillance, has said he didn't recall ever being briefed on the NYPD operations. He was one of several state and federal officials who had earlier criticized the NYPD's conduct in New Jersey, accusing the agency of acting like "masters of the universe" by sending agents into his state.

New Jersey's FBI chief, Michael Ward, also has been critical of the NYPD for not conducting the operations within the umbrella off the Joint Terrorism Task Force, to which the NYPD belongs. He said the actions undermined the bureau's own efforts by sowing distrust of authorities among Muslims and weakened national security.

© 2012 The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
13 Comments Add a Comment
linkicon reporticon emailicon
gonzage1 says:
It may be argued that until the objects of NYPD's quite warranted attention become identified primarily with positive events, keeping them under surveillance is only prudent, and should be part of any defensive model law enforcement agencies might design.

If the targets of prudent surveillance and their supporters are intent on casting blame, they should consider placing it properly on the late, unlamented bin Laden, al Queda, jihadists and jihadism, the murderer at Fort Hood, would-be underwear and car-bombers in Manhattan, murder-by-suicide bombers everywhere-- Afghanistan, Iran, Syria, Egypt, Libya, Nigeria, Palestinian territory et al. --and other such entities who bear full responsibility for giving "Muslim(s)" a bad name, and for destroying a precious commodity, namely, mutual trust.

We can only hope that the wrongly tarred bearers of that name will recognize the rationale for unobtrusive surveillance, and more importantly assist directly in identifying and expelling from their fold the wolves in sheep's clothing lurking there in -- wolves they are in a better position to identify than anyone else. Should that devoutly to be desired consummation materialize, there will be no need for surveillance.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
gonzage1 says:
It may be argued that until the objects of NYPD's quite warranted attention become identified primarily with positive events, keeping them under surveillance is only prudent, and should be part of any defensive model law enforcement agencies might design.

If the targets of prudent surveillance and their supporters are intent on casting blame, they should consider placing it properly on the late, unlamented bin Laden, al Queda, jihadists and jihadism, the murderer at Fort Hood, would-be underwear and car-bombers in Manhattan, murder-by-suicide bombers everywhere-- Afghanistan, Iran, Syria, Egypt, Libya, Nigeria, Palestinian territory et al. --and other such entities who bear full responsibility for giving "Muslim(s)" a bad name, and for destroying a precious commodity, namely, mutual trust.

We can only hope that the wrongly tarred bearers of that name will recognize the rationale for unobtrusive surveillance, and more importantly assist directly in identifying and expelling from their fold the wolves in sheep's clothing lurking there in -- wolves they are in a better position to identify than anyone else. Should that devoutly to be desired consummation materialize, there will be no need for surveillance.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
fedup12 says:
This is good thing I think.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Johnston1212 says:
I am a Christian and if my group starts flying airplanes into buildings and shooting people at fort hood and throwing bombs all over the world etc,etc,etc you can monitor me anytime.
reply
Bella_double-oh-seven replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Seriously? In that case all Christians should be monitored as well based on the terrorist acts commited by Timothy McVeigh (Catholic), Scott Roeder (said to be a member of Army of God), Eric Rudolph's bombings (responsibility claimed by Army of God). Some of the most prominent acts of terrorism on US soil were commited by CHRISTIANS.
linkicon reporticon emailicon
josephp5 says:
I'll bet if the NYPD was spying on non-Muslims in NJ, Gov. Christie would be having a fit.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
notparicular says:
Thank goodness. At least som e system in the country works.
reply
josephp5 replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Now if they would only start yanking anyone that looks Muslim out of airport security lines for special attention, I'll bet your faith in this country would be even more restored.
linkicon reporticon emailicon
teufeldritch says:
inter arma enim silent leges
reply
Lifesablast replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
True, but which WAR are you refering to ?
The War on Drugs ?
The War on Crime ?
The War on Women ?
The so-called war on terror ?
linkicon reporticon emailicon
o3whatever says:
True enough kroguej, but many do not pay attention.. sad really.. cause this is against the law, maybe not now cause they have change the laws to suit their needs when no-one is paying attention. As for me, I was born in 1950, so I consider myself under their contract at that time and year.. Everything else for them is a pipe dream.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
kroguej says:
Uhm, the governors have ultimately no say in interpretations of the law.
reply
euge005 replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Yep, like little Jeb bot did in Florida, they simply ingnore what they do not like to follow (FL pension fund scandel). But in general, profiling is distastful, but were we hacveing a problem with an other specific group, immigrant aboriginies from Australia say, wouldn't it be smart to target the minority and not harrass everyone in the country. We have yet to implicate any 80 year old grannies in a terrorist plot, so lets not strip search them.
See all 13 Comments