AP/ May 21, 2012, 12:09 PM

Supreme Court rules that twins conceived after dad's death won't get survivor benefits

WASHINGTON - The Supreme Court on Monday ruled that a man's children who were conceived through artificial insemination after his death cannot get Social Security survivor benefits.

Justices unanimously ruled that twins born to Robert Capato's surviving wife Karen did not qualify for survivor benefits because of a requirement that the federal government use state inheritance laws.

The Capato twins, conceived using Robert Capato's frozen sperm, were born 18 months after their father died of esophageal cancer. Karen Capato's application for survivor benefits on behalf of the twins was rejected by the Social Security Administration, which said Robert Capato needed to be alive during the children's conception to qualify. A federal judge agreed, saying they had to qualify as Capato's children before his death or qualify under state inheritance law as children who could legally inherit.

Capato died a Florida resident, and Florida law expressly bars children conceived posthumously from inheritance, unless they are named in a will. The only beneficiaries named in Capato's will are his wife, their son and his two children from a previous marriage.

The 3rd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Philadelphia overturned that decision, saying the Capato twins were clearly the biological children of Robert Capato and deserved the survivor benefits. But other federal appellate courts have ruled differently in similar cases, leaving the Supreme Court to come to a final conclusion.

"We find the Social Security Administration's ruling better attuned to the statute's text and its design to benefit primarily those the deceased wage earner actually supported in his or her lifetime," Ginsburg said. "And even if the agency's longstanding interpretation is not the only reasonable one, it is at least a permissible construction entitled to deference."

The case was heard by the Philadelphia appeals court because Karen Capato unsuccessfully argued that her children should have been considered citizens of New Jersey, which has different inheritance laws from Florida. The twins were conceived in Florida, but Karen Capato moved to New Jersey during the pregnancy.

Ginsburg called Robert Capato's death before he and his wife could provide their children with additional siblings "tragic."

But "the law Congress enacted calls for resolution of Karen Capato's application for child's insurance benefits by reference to state intestacy law," she said. "We cannot replace that reference by creating a uniform federal rule that statute's text scarcely supports."

© 2012 The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
28 Comments Add a Comment
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Mightycline says:
Means test everything. Let it all be means tested. Nobody has paid enough into Social Security to have "earned it" as one said here. Entitlements should end and welfare needs a new name. That new name could be "alms for the poor" and I like the sound of those words. So, we need to means test "ALL" public benefits and do away with rich politicians getting retirements that astound all of us. Mayor Daley and his clan stink of public retirement funds and we all look the other way. Wake up America. Semper Fi
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
makersvstakers says:
What kind of person turns a personal tragedy into greed? It reminds me of the welfare babies in the 1970's. Entitlements have corrupted the character of Americans.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
nohater says:
the justices finally got one right! three cheers for the justices!
reply
Mightycline replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Agreed. I like this current gang of nine. Long live John Roberts. We need to tell our elected officials to go jump of a cliff on their retirement benefits and adopt means tests on any and all formns of welfare which must include Social Security and SSI and disability and unemployment "insurance" benefits. Semper Fi
linkicon reporticon emailicon
gjc1n1 says:
Probably the most unfair result about this decision is that children born in states that recognize them will get SS an dother benefits but states that have no such laws or laws against kids born after their father's death will get nothing. Aren't we all equal under the law?
reply
Mightycline replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Yes, in the state that you reside. Using your thought: No....Semper Fi
Mightycline replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
In the Lord's eye only are we equal. Let's means test all benefits and stop the politicians from getting pensions and health care for life. Matter of fact, public service should mean short terms and turnover and no pensions and no health care for anyone elected. Do we really need failures that cannot provide for themselves and still those failures most often become local politicians to gain the benefits system they are now provided?
linkicon reporticon emailicon
freeamerica31 says:
I don't believe any benefits should go to any child from Social Security.

It's all a scam regardless because most parents that die prior to their children gaining the age of 18 don't put in half the money that the kids and possibly the mother will take out of the system in their lifetimes. It's double dipping.

If the remaining parent needs help monatarily they should have to apply for welfare benefits...not allow kids to draw money on Social Security.
reply
itslawayssunny replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
I think what you are saying is ridiculous. I am currently in the process of getting social security for my daughter. It is partially money he paid into the system and money he would be providing for our daughter if he were still alive. Why should I have to be on welfare or struggle to take care of my child, when my daughters dad paid into the system partially for circumstances like this? How is it double dipping?
linkicon reporticon emailicon
sdemaggie says:
Wow, even Ginsburg said no!
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
cantsee1 says:
Trying to suck free money out of the system for those losers didn't work. Finally, someone did something right in denying them.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
cantsee1 says:
Trying to suck free money out of the system for those losers didn't work. Finally, someone did something right in denying them.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
time2fightback says:
This is pure GREED, she should NOT GET 1 PENNY not even food stamps, that should go for all woman if you have a child you cant afford then to bad..
reply
hypnotoad72 replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Just wait. In "the new normal" you too might no longer be able to support a child...
cbsnews_viewer replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
And we could really balance the budget by not trying to police the world, like that is going to happen.
linkicon reporticon emailicon
credibility2 says:
...sounds to me like the woman was trying to scam the system by using her dead husband's sperm to artificially create two kids...glad she was turned down...
reply
hypnotoad72 replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
I'm inclined to agree.
gjc1n1 replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
A scam???? Did it ever occur to you that she loved her husband and wanted his children? There is nothing artificial about living and breathing human beings.
See all 28 Comments