Pentagon suspends "counterjihad" class on Islam
CBS/AP
(AP) WASHINGTON - A course for U.S. military officers has been teaching that America's enemy is Islam in general, not just terrorists, and suggesting that the country might ultimately have to obliterate the Islamic holy cities of Mecca and Medina without regard for civilian deaths, following World War II precedents of the nuclear attack on Hiroshima or the allied firebombing of Dresden.
The Pentagon suspended the course in late April when a student objected to the material. The FBI also changed some agent training last year after discovering that it, too, was critical of Islam.
The teaching in the military course was counter to repeated assertions by U.S. officials over the past decade that the U.S. is at war against Islamic extremists, not the religion itself.
"They hate everything you stand for and will never coexist with you, unless you submit," the instructor, Army Lt. Col. Matthew Dooley, said in a presentation last July for the course at Joint Forces Staff College in Norfolk, Virginia. The college, for professional military members, teaches midlevel officers and government civilians on subjects related to planning and executing war.
Dooley also presumed, for the purposes of his theoretical war plan, that the Geneva Conventions that set standards of armed conflict are "no longer relevant."
He adds: "This would leave open the option once again of taking war to a civilian population wherever necessary (the historical precedents of Dresden, Tokyo, Hiroshima, Nagasaki being applicable...)."
His war plan suggests possible outcomes such as "Saudi Arabia threatened with starvation ... Islam reduced to cult status" and the Muslim holy cities of Mecca and Medina in Saudi Arabia "destroyed."
A copy of the presentation was obtained and posted online by Wired.com's Danger Room blog. The college did not respond to The Associated Press' requests for copies of the documents, but a Pentagon spokesman authenticated the documents.
Dooley still works for the college, but is no longer teaching, Joint Chiefs Chairman Gen. Martin Dempsey said.
Dooley refused to comment to the AP, saying "Can't talk to you, sir," and hanging up when reached by telephone at his office Thursday.
A summary of Dooley's military service record provided by Army Human Resources Command at Fort Knox, Kentucky, shows that he was commissioned as a second lieutenant upon graduation from the U.S. Military Academy at West Point in May 1994. He has served overseas tours in Germany, Bosnia, Kuwait and Iraq. He has numerous awards including a Bronze Star Medal, the fourth-highest military award for bravery, heroism or meritorious service.
In what he termed a model for a campaign to force a transformation of Islam, Dooley called for "a direct ideological and philosophical confrontation with Islam," with the presumption that Islam is an ideology rather than just a religion. He further asserted that Islam has already declared war on the West, and the U.S. specifically.
"It is therefore illogical" to continue with the current U.S. strategy, which Dooley said presumes there is a way of finding common ground with Islamic religious leaders without "waging near 'total war,'" he wrote.
The course on Islam was an elective taught since 2004 and not part of the required core curriculum. It was offered five times a year, with about 20 students each time, meaning roughly 800 students have taken the course over the years.
Though Dooley has been teaching at the college since August 2010, it was unclear when he took on that particular class, called "Perspectives on Islam and Islamic Radicalism."
Excerpts of statements from the course:
- "They hate everything you stand for and will never coexist with you, unless you submit."
- "Islam as it currently defines itself is an ideology rather than solely a religion with the normally associated protections we afford such beliefs."
- "It is therefore time for the United States to make our true intentions clear. This barbaric ideology will no longer be tolerated. Islam must change or we will facilitate its self-destruction."
- "The United States has come to accept that radical 'true Islam' is both a political and military enemy to free people throughout the world."
- Possible outcomes of an anti-Islam campaign: "Saudi Arabia threatened with starvation, Mecca and Medina destroyed, Islam reduced to cult status."
The joint staff suspended the course after it had received a student complaint, and within days Dempsey ordered all service branches to review their training to ensure other courses do not use anti-Islamic material.
On Thursday, Dempsey said the material in the Norfolk course was counter to American "appreciation for religious freedom and cultural awareness."
"It was just totally objectionable, against our values, and it wasn't academically sound," Dempsey said when asked about the matter at a Pentagon news conference. "This wasn't about ... pushing back on liberal thought; this was objectionable, academically irresponsible."
In his July 2011 presentation on a "counterjihad," Dooley asserted that the rise of what he called a "military Islam/Islamist resurgence" compels the United States to consider extreme measures, "unconstrained by fears of political incorrectness."
He described his purpose as generating "dynamic discussion and thought," while noting that his ideas and proposals are not official U.S. government policy and cannot be found in any current official Defense Department documents.
A Pentagon inquiry is seeking to determine whether someone above the professor's level is supposed to approve course materials and whether that approval process was followed in this case, said Col. Dave Lapan, spokesman for Dempsey.
The problem of negative portrayals of Islam in federal government is not new. A six-month review the FBI launched into agent training material uncovered 876 offensive or inaccurate pages that had been used in 392 presentations, including a PowerPoint slide that said the bureau can sometimes bend or suspend the law in counterterror investigations.
That is significant because ever since the terrorist attacks of Sept. 11, 2001, the FBI has stressed the importance of working with leaders in the Muslim community as an important part of the battle against terror. The FBI review began last September after Wired.com reported that the FBI had discontinued a lecture in which the instructor told agent trainees in Virginia that the more devout a Muslim is, the more likely he is to be violent.
Popular on CBSNews.com
- Bridge collapse blamed on tractor-trailer 212 Comments
- Washington state bridge collapses 20 Photos
- Best U.S. beaches 2013 10 Photos
- No fatalities in I-5 bridge collapse in NW Wash. 137 Comments
- Boy Scouts approve plan to accept openly gay boys 957 Comments
- Kansas reporters run for tornado shelter during newscast
- Earthquake, multiple aftershocks jolt Californians
- Clean-up efforts underway in Okla. 29 Photos
Before the crusades: most of the area had multuiple religions, living together. There was some trouble no doubt. Then the Muslims came and made it simple; our way or die. So in some respects the crusades could be viewed as 'taking back' or 'liberating' the area.
Except for AOCGuy and KPeters from UK, you all exhibit the worst traits of the Ugly American type. You really know nothing about which you write, nor do you take the time to learn.
For instance, no one, not even in the article, has discussed the various strains of Islam, from Shia to Sunni to Sufi and the beliefs held by any of them. No one has discussed the divisions within Sunni Islam, from, Salafist of which Wahhabist is a sub-sect, to Hanafi and Maliki, let alone the differences in religious belief of each of these groups.
Nor has anyone noted that Palestinian anger, for instance, with Americans is political only and has nothing to do with religion. The course instructor and most of you close your eyes to the complexities of real world facts and scream like the obscene bird of night!
Just using the word "Allah" means nothing more than westerners using the word "Jesus". The person using it may be a Catholic, a Lutheran, a Calvinist, a Southern Baptist, or a member of the Society of Friends, or even an atheist. They do not all have the same world view.
Just using the word "Allah" means nothing more than westerners using the word "Jesus". The person using it may be a Catholic, a Lutheran, a Calvinist, a Southern Baptist, or a member of the Society of Friends, or even an atheist. They do not all have the same world view.
So you too advocate genocide? What a peaceful Christian you turned out to be. The terrorists represent a small piece of Islam....a small piece and yet you want to wipe out the entire population!!
You and your like disgust me. Advocating a new Crusade in the form of World War III.
Did you ever hear OBL speak in English??? I don't think so. He spoke in Arabic so as to be understood by the widest number of people in the Islamic world. So he might have used the word "kafir" which is insulting, but supposed to refer only to atheists. Christians and Jews are considered by Islam to be "People of the Book" - Ahl al-kitab. That is the way most Muslims view them.
Also, it should be noted that in one important theological way, Muslims are closer to Jews than Christians, and that is because of the Christian doctrine of the Trinity. Muslims and Jews view God as unitary, within as well as without. In Islam, the unity doctrine is known as Tawhid.