CBS/AP/ May 2, 2012, 11:16 AM

FBI: Suspects tried to blow up bridge by phone

Photos provided by the FBI show, from top left, Douglas Wright, Brandon Baxter and Anthony Hayne and, from bottom left, Joshua Stafford and Connor Stevens, all of whom were arrested April 30, 2012, and accused of plotting to blow up a bridge near Cleveland.

Photos provided by the FBI show, from top left, Douglas Wright, Brandon Baxter and Anthony Hayne and, from bottom left, Joshua Stafford and Connor Stevens, all of whom were arrested April 30, 2012, and accused of plotting to blow up a bridge near Cleveland. / AP Photo/FBI

Updated 1:17 PM ET

(CBS/AP) CLEVELAND - Five men charged with plotting to bomb a bridge linking two wealthy Cleveland suburbs placed what they thought were real explosives at the site and repeatedly tried to detonate them using text messages from cellphones, according to an FBI affidavit filed in court.

Federal authorities on Tuesday described the men as anarchists who are angry with corporate America and the government and unknowingly worked with an FBI informant for months as they crafted and carried out their plan.

The FBI said suspects bought fake explosives from an undercover employee and put them at the base of a highway bridge over the Cuyahoga Valley National Park, about 15 miles south of downtown Cleveland, on Monday. After leaving the park, they tried to initiate the explosives using a text-message detonation code, and they called the person who provided the bombs to check the code when it failed, according to the FBI affidavit.

Their arrests that night marked the latest case in which FBI agents planned fake terrorism plots alongside targeted suspects, an indication it continues to be a top strategy for the government in preventing terrorism.

Cleveland Bomb Plot Update: 5 men charged in Ohio bridge bomb plot, FBI says
Alleged bridge bombers face judge, ordered jailed
FBI nabs 5 in alleged plot to blow up Ohio bridge

"They talked about making a statement against corporate America and the government as some of the motivations for their actions," U.S. Attorney Steven Dettelbach said Tuesday.

Court documents detail conversations the FBI secretly recorded in which its informant discussed bomb plans with some of the suspects. In one, Brandon L. Baxter, 20, of Lakewood, allegedly said, "Taking out a bridge in the business district would cost the ... corporate big wigs a lot of money" because it would cause structural damage and prevent people from going to work.

The alleged conversations depict Douglas L. Wright, 26, of Indianapolis, as a sort of group leader who recruited others, scouted out the bridge site and participated in buying the fake explosives.

The other suspects were identified as Joshua S. Stafford, 23, and Anthony Hayne, 35, both of Cleveland, and Connor Stevens, 20, of suburban Berea.

All five are charged with conspiracy and trying to bomb property used in interstate commerce. They appeared Tuesday in U.S. District Court and were ordered jailed without bond pending a hearing Monday.

The charges carry possible penalties of more than 20 years in prison.

Meanwhile, an attorney representing Baxter is questioning the role of an undercover informant.

Cleveland defense lawyer John Pyle says his client will plead not guilty at a hearing next week.

Pyle said Wednesday the case will be put under the microscope and there are indicators the informant was playing an active role in the plot.

Wright's attorney says his client also will plead not guilty.

Similar arrests in the last few years -- including in Massachusetts, Oregon, New York and Texas -- offer a glimpse into sting operations by undercover FBI agents trying to catch possible terrorists in the act.

Defense attorneys in those cases have accused federal authorities of conducting overblown operations that entrapped their clients. Authorities have defended the practice, saying it's prevented countless terrorist attacks.

Christopher Banks, an associate professor at Kent State University who has written on terrorism, defended the tactic as one of many the federal government uses in fighting terrorism. He said each case involving a possible terrorist threat is different, but after 9/11, caution weighs more on the side of government than the individual citizen.

"In this age that we live in, and with the heightened sense that the government should be doing something to prevent these kinds of acts, in that sense it can only protect public safety," he said. "So it's a fine line."

The suspects had been associated with the anti-corporate Occupy Cleveland movement but don't share its non-violent views and don't represent Occupy Cleveland, organizer Debbie Kline said.

The alleged plotters were frustrated that other anti-corporate protesters opposed violence, Dettelbach said.

Federal authorities said their investigation was aided by a convicted criminal who worked as a paid confidential source, made contact with the some of the suspects in October and recorded conversations with them over the past three months.

The men had considered different plots, including trying to bring down financial institution signs in downtown Cleveland or attacking other targets, including a law enforcement center, oil wells, a cargo ship or the opening of a new downtown casino, according to the affidavit. The document also alleges that one suspect talked about being part of group planning to cause trouble during an upcoming NATO summit in Chicago.

© 2012 CBS Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. The Associated Press contributed to this report.
33 Comments Add a Comment
linkicon reporticon emailicon
SteveS18 says:
Those "occupy" idiots should have set easier goals to "take down the man" like demanding prosecutions for Mortgage backed Security fraud, or foreclosure fraud or loan fraud or forgery, instead they complain and try to blow up stuff, they should be killed by the state for treason.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Philly2Naples says:
Their parents must be so very PROUD of their accomplishments.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
nieten7642 says:
These guys are the Occupy Wallstreet crowd taking it to the next level! Ask the city of Seattle. May Day Protests in Seattle anyone? Domestic terrorists! See what class warfare gets us?
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
icuping says:
Now they are a part of the group known as Occupy our a s s
reply
nieten7642 replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
LOL! That is hilarious!
linkicon reporticon emailicon
justwindi says:
what I'm wondering is if any of the five would have been smart enough to carry out something like that on their own without 'help' from the FBI? Or would they been like 99% of people like them, just talking BS and never doing anything about it?

I'm not sure that targeting potential 'terrorists', and HELPING them plan and carry out an attack is the right way to do this.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
2happy2ride says:
Seriously, has someone doctored the photo or are these hair-dos on the right face?
Why does the look almost ALWAYS match the crime? Heck, just start arresting strange looking people. I'm exonerated because I said it first.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
taxed01 says:
So do we excecute them or bleed the taxpayers dry supporting them?
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
rematenaj says:
What a fine looking bunch of guys!
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
stormerF69 says:
Associated with the OWS Cleveland but, do not represent the OWS Cleveland? I had no idea they were not card carring OWS Clevelanders,how would you tell the difference?
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
NickTheRat says:
Should arrest the FBI for giving them the idea to blow up a bridge and selling them the parts to do it. This is the 6th fake fbi bombing to legitimize the agency. They get bored not fighting bad guys so they make them up as they go along. WAKE UP PEOPLE! entrapment should be illegal, it only catches retards who wouldnt be able to commit the crime without the help from the fbi in the first place
reply
reality_sanity replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
It's not entrapment to monitor someone as they proceed to commit a crime. It's not entrapment to provide "fake explosives" to those contemplating committing a crime. Fortunately in this case the "source" of the explosives was the FBI meaning NO ONE got injured while these criminals executed their plans. The fact that they executed their plan is the reason they are guilty.
Choons replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
@reality_sanity the extent of these criminal "masterminds" was vandalizing billboards until the FBI got involved. They planted a career criminal among the group who had to produce a big bust as part of a deal to get out of his own prior criminal charges. Sure, these guys should have said "No way" to all this and they will pay for that. But I don't think these potheads would have ever pulled off anything more than vandalism without the FBI's influence on them.
See all 33 Comments