(CBS News) Now that George Zimmerman is behind bars facing murder charges for shooting Trayvon Martin in Sanford, Fla. on Feb. 26, there are questions about just how strong a case prosecutors have against him.
Special prosecutor Angela Corey's affidavit outlines her case, saying, Zimmerman "profiled" Martin as a suspicious person, and became the aggressor when he "disregarded the police dispatcher" on this call.
Complete coverage of the Trayvon Martin case on CBS News
Corey said, "If (the) 'Stand Your Ground' (law) becomes an issue, we will fight it."
But many criminal trial lawyers in Orlando see nothing in the special prosecutor's affidavit that would convict Zimmerman.
Florida's "Stand Your Ground" law allows even the original aggressor in a fight to use deadly force - if that person becomes reasonably afraid of being killed or seriously hurt.
Trial lawyer Richard Hornsby has litigated 15 "Stand Your Ground" cases - none of them homicides - and won them all.
Hornsby told CBS News he thinks Corey's affidavit is more significant for what it leaves out than for what it includes.
"The moment George Zimmerman fired that shot is the key question in this entire case," Hornsby said. "Did he reasonably believe he had to fire that shot to defend himself? And the fact (Corey) completely left that out, begs the question, does she not have any evidence to refute his version of the events?"
A hearing next Friday will determine whether Zimmerman should be freed on bond.
(Jean Casarez, an attorney and correspondent for "In Session" on Tru-TV, discussed the case on CBS This Morning: Saturday." Watch her analysis in the video below.)
Judge Jessica Recksiedler might have to step aside from George Zimmerman's murder case. Her husband works in the same law firm as a CNN legal analyst. Mark O'Mara, Zimmerman's lawyer, will decide next week whether he sees that as a conflict.
Zimmerman attorney may ask judge to drop caseFor Mark Strassmann's full report, watch the video in the player above.
From the beginning, Zimmerman is sitting in his truck describing the suspects actions.
At 1:34 in the tape, the dispatcher tells Zimmerman "just let me know if he does anything else". Zimmerman continues passing information, including when the suspect passes by his truck (parked a few feet from the path Trayvon went down). Zimmerman never got out to confront the suspect. Trayvon then ran down the path and disappears. Zimmerman, still following the first instruction to keep the dispatcher informed, gets out of his truck to see where Trayvon went. The dispatcher, hearing Zimmerman leave the truck, tells him he doesn't have to do that (follow where the suspect went) AND ZIMMERMAN IMMEDIATELY STOPS AND SAYS "OK". This all takes about 10 seconds of jogging from when the truck door closes on the tape which brings Zimmerman right by the attack site.
They keep talking for about 2 more minutes and Zimmerman hangs up. Within 30-60 seconds of the hang up and near where Zimmerman stopped, the attack occurs.
THERE NEVER WAS ANY STALKING. Zimmerman just followed both of the dispatcher's instructions: First, to keep the dispatcher informed; and second, to not follow the suspect after he disappeared (to protect Zimmerman not the suspect).
There is amazing spin in the press. The dispatcher, in advising Zimmerman, WAS TRYING TO PROTECT THE BLOCK WATCHER FROM A POTENTIALLY VIOLENT SUSPECT WHO MIGHT TURN ON HIM. And that is exactly what appears to have happened when Trayvon, instead of going home about 250 ft further down the pathway, hid for about 2 minutes until the confrontation near where Zimmerman had stopped and was talking to the dispatcher.
If that is so...WHY was he screaming?
Perhaps because becoming aware that Zimmerman was armed and aiming his weapon at him...he was yelling for help in the hope that someone would come along, and by their mere presence, stop Zimmerman from shooting him to death...but no one came...and he is dead
That being the case...Zimmerman is a first degree murderer who should jump at the murder 2 charge. That being the case...Zimmerman clearly killed the kid AFTER Martin had stopped doing whatever attacking he may or may not have been doing....and that Zimmerman flat-out executed him as punishment for the beating he claims he took.
I've read the usual reich-wing Zimmerman apologists glibly dismissing the Florida newspaper's "expert" tape analysis, and claiming that a 48 match means almost a 50-50 chance that it's Zimmerman
THAT...IS...NOT...TRUE!
If the voice on the tape is PROVEN by the FBI to not be George Zimmerman's, than it MUST be Trayvon Martin's...unless of course if Zimmerman "suddenly remembers" that someone ELSE was there yelling for help...but mysteriously disappeared, and he just forgot about it
If that turns out to be a valid interpretation of the existing forensic evidence...of the provable FACTS...in a case that was over a month late being initially investigated......and not the stupid partisan conjecture posted here so often with "facts" that are not only plucked out of the void, but later mangled into weird shapes to fit a pre-determined point of view when they stop functioning properly (because of contradictory evidence)
If that turns out to be true...then George Zimmerman should count himself very fortunate indeed to have avoided riding the needle...
But I'm patient...I can wait to find out FOR SURE what happened...not all this, "Zimmerman said...Zimmerman said...but the other guy in the case is dead" (so we just have to take George's word and give him cred)
Right on page 1 of the crimestooper's handbook, it states that people who shoot other people to death very often lie about it later when talking with the police about how it happened.
Funny that no one in the Sanford PD ever read that part of the manual...
@bettyVA
I'm sorry when a poster reads "WANTED DEAD OR ALIVE" with a 10 grand bounty I don't see how that is a "legal, citizen's arrest"
----
Sorry there is no bounty there were apologies, retractions and repudiations by many. You continue to THREATEN George's life more than the New Black Panthers by lying to keep this non-existent threat alive.
...
3) He followed him for a grand total of ~12 seconds
----
George pursued Trayvon for over 5 minutes -- his 911 call was 4 minutes in length and he was following before placing the 911 call. George was following for 1 minute after completing his 911 call before the shooting and the police arrived. In addition George pursued Trayvon long enough to be ID'ed and cause a retreat by Trayvon. Giving Trayvon and not George a self-defense claim under Florida's SYG law -- as Trayvon had more than a simple belief byt he had observed actual actions considered aggressive (stalking) under the law. According to any state laws I have seen (including those knowledgeable with Florida law) George is required to successfully disengage from his pursuit before he can establish a self-defense claim (Trayvon would have needed to cease his flight, reached a sanctuary such as his home, of in this case George would have had to cease pursuit for at least an equal amount of time as he spent in pursuit). Instead George completed his 911 call and spent the last minute hands free ready for confrontation in pursuit of Trayvon. Trayvon at the same time maintained an open phone call -- not an act of someone planning a confrontation to not have his hands free and invite a witness to the violence he is alleged to have planned bgt many posting about this event. According to one source the person calling for help as determined in a court of law has what is generally accepted as solid grounds for a self-defense claim. Forensic testing of the tapes will provide the identity of the person calling for help considering eyewitness testimony is inconclusive (it goes both ways) and is generally considered unreliable when forensic evidence with provable accuracy refutes it.