AP/ February 23, 2012, 3:11 PM

Post office plans 35,000 job cuts

Getty Images

WASHINGTON - With no financial relief in sight, the U.S. Postal Service is pushing ahead with planned cuts to more than 260 mail processing centers around the nation, part of a billion-dollar cost-cutting effort that will slow delivery of first-class mail.

In a statement Thursday, the cash-strapped agency said it had completed a review of closings to mail processing centers it had proposed last fall. Based on community input and other factors, the post office said, it will move forward with consolidations involving virtually all of the 252 facilities on the list, as well as up to 12 new locations, beginning in mid-May.

Of the 264 facilities, roughly 41 won't be closed or consolidated right away as the post office conducts additional reviews.

Mail processing centers proposed for consolidation or closure
Watch: Post Office cutbacks could slow mail delivery

The consolidations are expected to result in a loss of roughly 35,000 jobs, which the post office hopes to achieve mainly through attrition. The agency described the move as a necessary cost-saving measure because of declining mail volume as people and businesses continue switching to the Internet in place of letters and paper bills.

The 12 locations added to the list include those in Owensboro, Ky.; Washington, Pa.; Cardiss Collins (Chicago), Ill.; Gaylord, Mich.; Staten Island, New York; Mankato, Minn.; Champaign, Ill.; Atlanta, Ga.; Corpus Christi, Texas; Fort Worth, Texas; Mid-Florida, Fla.; and Butte, Mont.

"The steps we are taking now will put the Postal Service on a strong financial footing for decades to come," the agency said in a statement.

The estimated $3 billion in reductions are part of a wide-ranging effort by the Postal Service to quickly trim costs, seeing no immediate help from Congress. It is seeking to close or consolidate more than half of its nearly 500 mail processing centers.

Because the consolidations typically would lengthen the distance mail travels from post office to processing center, the agency also would lower delivery standards for first-class mail that, for the first time in 40 years, will eliminate the chance for stamped letters to arrive the next day.

Last week, the Postal Service warned it will lose as much as $18.2 billion a year by 2015 unless Congress grants it new leeway to eliminate Saturday delivery and raise the price of a postage stamp by as much as 5 cents.

It is asking Congress for permission to make service cuts and reduce annual payments of about $5.5 billion to prefund retiree health benefits. At the request of Congress, the cash-strapped agency agreed to wait until mid-May to begin closures so lawmakers would have time to stabilize its finances first.

But in recent weeks, the Senate and House have stalled as lawmakers differ widely on costs, the level of financial oversight and the prospect of widespread postal closures.

The Postal Service, an independent agency of government, is subject to congressional control on major aspects of its operations. Earlier this month, the Postal Service said its quarterly loss ballooned to $3.3 billion amid declining mail volume and said it could run out of money by October.

Sen. Bernie Sanders, I-Vt., who is pushing for legislative changes that would stop or delay mass closings of mail processing centers, described the proposed closings as counterproductive. He and 26 other senators recently signed a letter to congressional sponsors of postal legislation seeking to prevent cuts to first-class mail delivery.

"At a time when the Postal Service is competing against the instantaneous delivery of information from email and the Internet, slowing down mail delivery service will result in less business and less revenue, and will bring about a death spiral for this institution," Sanders said.

© 2012 The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
37 Comments Add a Comment
linkicon reporticon emailicon
slatep says:
I think it's past time that the government stopped collecting taxes from the USPS and BAIL THEM OUT.

Obama bailed out the automobile companies, thieving banks, Wall Street and mortgage companies.!!

Now the US is TRILLIONS of dollars in debt thanks to Obama and Congress.

At least with the USPS we get what we pay for.!!
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
rightbehind says:
by cindydream February 24, 2012 10:03 AM EST
Every time Congress pays attention to Post Office issues TAXPAYERS ARE PAYING FOR THAT TIME!
----------------------------------------------------------

LOL! I guess we should pay congress for just sitting around. Your statement is nuts.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
omnibus66 says:
The Postal Service is the most efficient of any federal agency, by a country mile. It receives ZERO tax revenue, either for operating expenses, health care or retirement programs. Polls indicate that over 80% of people have a positive opinion of the service.

Unions that represent postal workers have no right to strike, and therefore have little effect on salaries or benefits. They exist primarily to assist workers in grievance arbitration, and to protect workers from the Postal Inspection Service.

If the Postal Service were to fold, you could probably still send a letter via UPS or FedEx, but you would have to shell out five bucks (or more) to do it.
reply
2happy2ride replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Your post is very misleading and obviously biased.
The Postal Service is a self-funding, but its workers draw benefits from the federal government's health-care, retirement and workers' compensation funds - payments totaling billions of dollars annually, TAX PAYER MONEY.

As for your union claim; Ever heard of a USPS employee getting fired? NOT likely. The union's demands for retirement are so stringent, it is the supreme cause for the $8.5 Billion loss just last year. The USPS is required to pay for the retirement of a FUTURE employees, those NOT yet born. It is a "pre-fund," for future retirees, but costs the USPS over $5 billion a year.
Face it, the USPS, like every other unionized organization is inexcusably inefficient. Fax it, email it or post it.
linkicon reporticon emailicon
credibility2 says:
Pensions and benefits are what's causing USPS problems. Every state is having similar problems with government workers, their unions, pensions and benefits. Collectively, they're ruining financials. Private sector is expected to keep feeding the pigs.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
RobAla says:
If the US Postal Service decides to stop Saturday delivery of letters, then the federal government needs to stop it's restriction of not allowing other delivery systems (UPS, Fed EX...etc) from delivering letters. It is probably time to dissolve the US Postal Service, if it Americans can no longer rely on the agency to deliver mail on Saturdays and deliver mail in a timely fashion. Other businesses could deliver mail to homes. People could sign up with UPS or Fed Ex, put a label on their mailboxes, and those businesses could provide the service.

I am all for working Americans to make a good living, but the other aspect that is left out of this article is the huge overhead the US Postal Service carries in high pay and huge retirement benefits to it's workers. This is why that agency could not handle a reduction of volume of mail - the overhead is way too large. The US Postal Service is grossly mismanaged. This is exactly why the auto industry got in trouble and demanded stupid bailouts from the American people.
reply
retm-w replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
UPS or FEDX delivering letters, as another poster said hope you like paying $5.00 to mail a letter. Check their package rates compared to USPS. And congress controls the postage rates, not the USPS.
linkicon reporticon emailicon
rightbehind says:
Friends, We are being robbed of our postal service. The republicans passed a law in Dec of 2006 before they lost control of both houses that forced our post Office to line the pockets of health care insurance companies more than 10 years in advance. it immediate sent the post office budget into the red in Jan of 2007 when the democrats took over. It was part of the republican scorched earth policy.

For less than 50 cents the post office will come to your home, pick up a letter and mail it more than 3200 miles from coast to coast. It's a service. Not a business. Name one private company that will offer you that kind of service for so little.


Call your representatives and demand the republican law be repealed.
reply
factsplease1 replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
I agree with you completely. The unfortunate thing is most people in this country have no clue to the facts of your statement and way too many people are too damn lazy to research anything on their own. They just like repeating hyperbole they hear on Faux news or other unreliable sources.
Samlv replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Too bad we failed to teach critical thinking in school, so now we're overrun by comments and thoughts posted by completely uniformed people.

Whatever happened to seeking out and listening to experts? Too bad that idea got thrown under the PC bus.
See all 4 Replies
linkicon reporticon emailicon
notyrants says:
newsworthy8 February 23, 2012 6:38 PM EST
Shut it down and go private enterprise.
-----------------------------------
Keep Wall Street out of State Pensions. The 1% is evil, the rest who favor their policies are morons who will see this nation looking like France in the year 1720.
reply
rightbehind replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
The jobs created in the private shipping businesses are crap jobs and many cases have to be supplemented by welfare. The Post office provides good jobs that people can depend on.
linkicon reporticon emailicon
notyrants says:
PourpaixPourpaix February 23, 2012 6:45 PM EST
Businesses like FedEx, UPS, and Indian casinos are profitable enough to pay expenses and show a profit for the owners. Yet, the government can't run a successful non-profit. In Washington State, they ran the liquor sales business into the ground. Finally got out of it on a referendum that assured the state of not only the tax revenue, but the profits over cost, as well.
--------------------

Lies of the predators.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
notyrants says:
ThyAlmightyKing February 23, 2012 6:46 PM EST
Obama strikes again .....

Post office plans 35,000 job cuts !!!!!!!!!!
------------------------------------
Ha, too much. Otherwise it's the big liberal government wasteful spending and inefficiency.
Maybe United Parcel Service can lobby for government taxpayer subsidy so they can pay their CEO, CFO and investors more money.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
PourpaixPourpaix says:
Businesses like FedEx, UPS, and Indian casinos are profitable enough to pay expenses and show a profit for the owners. Yet, the government can't run a successful non-profit. In Washington State, they ran the liquor sales business into the ground. Finally got out of it on a referendum that assured the state of not only the tax revenue, but the profits over cost, as well.

So, to solve this problem, we're gonna cut 35,000 jobs, attrition presumably largely by retirement, and quit funding the retirement plan. So, we pay retirees directly as if they are salaried and not via an investment trust. The net effect is we get a lot of retired postal workers that appear on the books to be employees who are paid to do nothing.

Meanwhile, state governments and the feds will spare no effort criminalizing those dirty, abusive employers who underfund their company-sponsored retirement plans.
reply
factsplease1 replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Not sure I understand your rant. Postal workers are on the Federal Retirement plan just as your Sen. and Reps. are and all Federal employees are. They pay into these plans plus they pay Soc. Sec. So exactly what are you saying???
credibility2 replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
...federal workers and other government workers don't pay into Social Security...most of their retirement contributions aren't even funded by the individual worker...the taxpayer is left holding the bag...most government workers retire with a package that is almost to the penny of their most recent salary...no taxpayer funded system can be expected to pay for this...it's draining resources that should be used for other services...taxpayers aren't here to support the government worker...they're already paying their salaries and shouldn't be expected to continue supporting them into their retirement...
See all 37 Comments