Jerry Sandusky makes case for local jury

Jerry Sandusky, a former Penn State assistant football coach charged with sexually abusing boys, pauses while speaking to the media at the Centre County Courthouse after a bail conditions hearing Friday, Feb. 10, 2012 in Bellefonte, Pa. / AP Photo/Alex Brandon
Last Updated 12:20 p.m. ET
BELLEFONTE, Pa. - Jerry Sandusky said a local jury would be no more or less biased against him in his child sex abuse trial than a jury from anywhere else in Pennsylvania.
The former Penn State assistant coach told Judge John Cleland he agreed with his attorney's request to have a State College-area jury hear his case and acknowledged he'd be waiving his right to appeal a possible guilty verdict on the grounds the local jury was biased.
Prosecutors oppose the use of a local jury, saying an out-of-county jury would be more fair.
Cleland promised a quick ruling on all the issues, including tightening or loosening Sandusky's bail restrictions and the jury-related motion.
Speaking to reporters afterwards, Sandusky said he came to today's hearing because he misses seeing his grandchildren, and also wants it to be easier for him to see old friends, who currently would need to be approved by probation officials.
Sandusky said his "home has been open for 27 years to all kinds of people."
"I have a wife who came home after visiting with grandchildren or who's sitting there when grandchildren call on my birthday, and they ask to talk to me, and she has to tell them that they can't. I'm sensitive to that," he said.
"Or when she comes home from visiting with grandchildren and tells me that one of them said that 'The only thing I want for my birthday is to be able to see Papa,' I'm sensitive to that."
But prosecutors say Sandusky's home isn't a safe place for children. Authorities say some of the alleged abuse happened in the home's basement.
Prosecutors want Sandusky kept indoors pre-trial
Sandusky lawyer seeks accusers' phone numbers
Bail restrictions were also among the issues presented to Judge Cleland at today's pretrial hearing.
Both sides want to change the rules of Sandusky's house arrest. He is seeking permission to allow his 11 grandchildren to visit his home, accompanied by a parent, as well as to be allowed to communicate with them by phone or computer.
Prosecutors noted one daughter-in-law strongly objects to increased contact between her children and Sandusky.
"This home was not safe for children for 15 years, and it's not safe for children now," said state prosecutor Jonelle Eshbach.
Defense attorney Joesph Amendola presented the court with letters from Sandusky's children, and notes and drawings from his grandchildren, expressing their desire for increased contact. He also noted a court-appointed guardian for grandchildren who are part of a custody dispute found no reason Sandusky couldn't see them.
The state attorney general's office has asked for tougher bail rules, arguing that the provisions of Sandusky's house arrest should be altered to require him to stay indoors after neighbors complained they've seen him on his back porch, watching children play in a nearby schoolyard.
An attorney general's office investigator, Anthony Sassano, testified that neighbors and school personnel expressed their concerns about Sandusky's presence on his back deck.
Sassano testified that Sandusky's presence had disrupted school activities in classrooms from which the former coach's home is visible.
One neighbor had used a video camera to document Sandusky's trips to his deck, Sassano said.
Amendola asked what was seen on the recordings, with Sassano responding that on one Sandusky is brushing his dog and on another he'd let the dog out to play. Amendola noted Sandusky is not allowed to give his dog standard walks because of his bail restrictions.
Sandusky faces 52 criminal counts for alleged sexual misconduct involving boys over 15 years, actions that police and prosecutors say have included violent sexual assault inside the Penn State football team facilities. He has denied the allegations.
Prosecutors have said the special position Penn State holds for people in Centre County would make it a challenge for jurors there to render a fair verdict. Sandusky, 68, wants a Centre County jury.
Popular on CBSNews.com
- No fatalities in I-5 bridge collapse in NW Wash. 118 Comments
- Bridge section disappears in "big puff of dust"
- Washington state bridge collapses 17 Photos
- Young victims of deadly Okla. tornado 10 Photos
- Boy Scouts approve plan to accept openly gay boys 457 Comments
- Kansas reporters run for tornado shelter during newscast
- Clean-up efforts underway in Okla. 29 Photos
- Kids, teachers from destroyed Okla. school reunite














********************************************
Sounds to me like the locals are more against him than for him. They want him confined to indoors on his own property. It might be to his benefit not to have a "local jury".
Any attempt to hold this trial in Penn State's backyard will constitute an outright flagrant, in-your-face, defiant attempt to sabotage the legal justice system. It's called "forum shopping" and that is precisely why Sandusky's attorney is fighting tooth & nail to keep the trial in Penn State's backyard. He knows that if the trial is held in a location 'free of pro-Penn-State prejudice' his client is going to be spending the rest of his days in a cage. What brutal irony it would be - if the same prejudice that ignored these child rape\abuse crimes ended up acquittal a child molester and child rapist.
I will for ever more hold Penn State in tremendous contempt for so militantly and perniciously trying to whitewash, cover-up and sandbag these decrepit, demented child abuse crimes to the bitter end.
"Jerry Sandusky said a local jury would be no more or less biased against him in his child sex abuse trial than a jury from anywhere else in Pennsylvania.
The former Penn State assistant coach told Judge John Cleland he agreed with his attorney's request to have a State College-area jury hear his case and acknowledged he'd be waiving his right to appeal a possible guilty verdict on the grounds the local jury was biased."
Can you read?
What a brain-dead statement to make.
The reason for the change in venue is not to mitigate bias AGAINST Mr. Sandusky but to lessen the bias in FAVOR of him