Marine gets no jail time for Haditha killings
Staff Sgt. Frank Wuterich walks into court during opening statements in the Haditha murders trial at Camp Pendleton Jan. 9, 2012, in Oceanside, Calif. / AFP/Getty Images
CAMP PENDLETON, Calif. - A military judge has recommended no time in confinement for a Marine sergeant who pleaded guilty to negligent dereliction of duty in assaults by his squad that killed 24 unarmed Iraqis after a roadside bomb killed a Marine in the town of Haditha in 2005.
The judge's decision Tuesday at Camp Pendleton, Calif., now goes to the commander of the Marine Corps Forces Central Command for approval.
Staff Sgt. Frank Wuterich of Meriden, Conn., entered the plea Monday in a deal that ended a voluntary manslaughter case against him.
Wuterich has acknowledged ordering his squad to "shoot first, ask questions later" after a roadside bomb took the life of a fellow Marine, but he said he did not shoot any of the 10 women and children killed in nearby homes that he stormed with his men.
"The truth is: I never fired my weapon at any women or children that day," Wuterich told military judge Lt. Col. David Jones, who will recommend a sentence that must then be approved by the commander of Marine Corps Forces Central Command.
The contention by Wuterich contradicts prosecutors who implicated him in 19 of the 24 deaths. It also counters testimony from a former squad mate who said he joined Wuterich in firing in a dark back bedroom where a woman and children were killed.
Marine reaches plea in Haditha killing case
Marine says he would have leveled Iraqi home
Marine: Sgt. called for bloodshed in Haditha
Military: Marine lost control in Iraq massacre
During the ongoing sentencing hearing, prosecutors asked Jones to give Wuterich the maximum sentence of three months confinement, a reduction in rank and forfeiture of two-thirds of his pay.
They said his knee-jerk reaction of sending the squad to assault nearby homes without positively identifying the threat went against his training and led to the deaths of the 10 women and children.
"That is a horrific result from that derelict order of shooting first, ask questions later," Lt. Col. Sean Sullivan told the court.
Defense attorney Neal Puckett countered that Wuterich has lived under the cloud of being labeled a killer who carried out a massacre in Iraq. Lawyers also said he has been exonerated of directly causing the deaths of civilians in the two homes and insisted his only intent was to protect his Marines, calling it "honorable and noble."
"The appropriate punishment in this case, your honor, is no punishment," Puckett said.
Wuterich, 31, told the court that his guilty plea should not suggest that he believes his men behaved badly or that they acted in any way that was dishonorable to their country. He said he ordered his men to "shoot first, ask questions later" so they would not hesitate in attacking the enemy, but he never intended to harm any civilians.
The plea deal that halted Wuterich's manslaughter trial has sparked outrage in Iraq, where many said it proves the United States does not hold its military accountable for its actions.
In Iraq, residents of the Euphrates river town of Haditha were angered by the fact that not one of the eight Marines initially charged will be convicted of manslaughter. A survivor of the killings, Awis Fahmi Hussein, showed his scars from being hit by a bullet in the back.
"I was expecting that the American judiciary would sentence this person to life in prison and that he would appear and confess in front of the whole world that he committed this crime, so that America could show itself as democratic and fair," he said.
In his statement, Wuterich also addressed family members of the Iraqi victims, saying there were no words to ease their pain.
"I wish to assure you that on that day, it was never my intention to harm you or your families. I know that you are the real victims of Nov. 19, 2005," he said.
A former squad mate testified during the trial that he joined Wuterich in firing in a dark back bedroom of one of the homes where he saw small silhouettes. Later, when former Cpl. Stephen Tatum returned, he said he found woman and children had been killed.
Military prosecutors worked for more than six years to bring Wuterich to trial on manslaughter charges that could have sent him away to prison for life.
But only weeks after the long-awaited trial started, they offered Wuterich the deal that stopped the proceedings and dropped the nine counts of manslaughter..
It was a stunning outcome for the last defendant in the case once compared with the My Lai massacre in Vietnam. The seven other Marines initially charged were exonerated or had their cases dropped.
The Haditha attack is considered among the war's defining moments, further tainting America's reputation when it was already at a low point after the release of photos of prisoner abuse by U.S. soldiers at Abu Ghraib prison.
Legal experts said the case was fraught with errors made by investigators and the prosecution that let it drag on for years. The prosecution was also hampered by squad mates who acknowledged they had lied to investigators initially and later testified in exchange for having their cases dropped, bringing into question their credibility.
In addition, Wuterich was seen as taking the fall for senior leaders and more seasoned combat veterans, analysts said. It was his first time in combat.
Brian Rooney, an attorney for another former defendant, said cases like Haditha are difficult to prosecute because a military jury is unlikely to question decisions made in combat unless wrongdoing is clear-cut and egregious, like rape.
"If it's a gray area, fog-of-war, you can't put yourself in a Marine's situation where he's legitimately trying to do the best he can," said Rooney, who represented Lt. Col. Jeffrey Chessani, the highest-ranking Marine charged in the case. "When you're in a town like Haditha or Fallujah, you've got bad guys trying to kill you and trying to do it in very surreptitious ways."
During the trial before a jury of combat Marines who served in Iraq, prosecutors argued he lost control after seeing the body of his friend blown apart by the bomb and led his men on a rampage in which they stormed two nearby homes, blasting their way in with gunfire and grenades. Among the dead was a man in a wheelchair.
Wuterich said his orders were based on the guidance of his platoon commander at the time. He has acknowledged the squad did not take any gunfire during the 45-minute raid.
Many of his squad mates testified that they do not believe to this day that they did anything wrong because they feared insurgents were inside hiding.
Haditha prompted commanders to demand troops be more careful in distinguishing between civilians and combatants.
(Below, watch a part of Wuterich's interview with CBS' "60 Minutes" in 2007)
"60 Minutes": The killings in Haditha
Video: Part 1 of 2007 interview
Video: Part 2 of 2007 interview
Popular on CBSNews.com
- Serena Williams sorry for "what I supposedly said" on rape
- TWA Flight 800 gets another look 17 years later 112 Comments
- TWA Flight 800 disaster - a look back 19 Photos
- 3 football players charged in Naval Academy rape case
- FBI: No sign of Jimmy Hoffa's body in Detroit suburb
- America's endangered historic places 11 Photos
- Reporter Michael Hastings dies at 33
- FBI finds possible remains at gangster's NYC home
The Iraqi officials refused to give our troops a free pass to murder their civilians.
This isn't the only massacre this country has committed.
It was unprofessional. It was wrong. It runs counter to our democratic justice.
The judges are wrong.
Hats off to Nick Broomfield: "It's a thought process that justifies wanton, crazed killing, that demands a high five when a fellow soldier announces they've killed an innocent child." http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2012/jan/13/bush-my-lai-haditha-massacre-fund?INTCMP=SRCH
We cannot blame Israel or all of the Marine Corps or all of America, so let's stop being "knee-jerk" anti-American, anti-military and anti-Israel in this case.
Folks, war is never a "moral" thing. It's a scenareo where people enter into an area and deliberately try to kill each other. There is absolutely no way anyone can make a war a "moral" one by restricting our soldiers' ability to fight, and to defend themselves. Imposing such restrictions merely makes us feel good and justified, as we sit at home and enjoy our lives away from the war. Meanwhile, our soldiers try to stay alive - they try to survive, while somehow fulfilling the objective we've directed them to attain.
Folks, the immorality of war begins in our Houses of Congress, and in the White House. It begins in our own houses. It begins in our own minds when we decide to enter into a war. We can hate our politicians, and we can hate ourselves for deciding to participate in a war. But, we can never hate the soldiers who go into the war zone and risk their lives fighting our wars. This young man risked his life to fight a war he didn't start - we did. As such, this man deserves complete immunity for actions like the ones he is accused of. If you want to "punish" this man, go punish yourself, but leave this man alone.
The sad truth is that, I couldn't encourage anyone I know to join the Armed Forces of the United States because, I know how much they will sacrifice, and how little their sacrifice will be appreciated. Instead of being lauded as the heroes they really are, they'll be condemned, abused, and neglected, and, when they're no longer able to serve usefully, they'll be forcibly discharged and left on the side of the street to heal all by themselves. This is the America that makes me sick.
Leave this man alone.
You seem to aggregate the responsibility of war on every American, even those who didn't want this country to go to war in Iraq. Now this soldier has impunity by wiping out women and children because you think everyone is to blame--since the soldier went to defend our country. It was a pre-emptive (offensive) war, there was no fake blast on a ship like what started the Viet Nam war. The political desire of showing whose boss in the middle east is sublimated upon the Marine Corp, and every operation in the fog of war is appropriate. Americans seem to accept this matter-of-factly, no conscience is necessary.
How can you compare what happened in Haditha with what the Nazis did in WWII? Have you ever been to a Concentration Camp? Do you have any idea what the Nazis did? They systematically rounded up Jewish and Jypsy civilians, put them on railroad trains, and shipped them off to camps. There they were sorted out between those who could work and those who coudn't, and they promptly herded the "useless" ones into gass chambers, telling them they were showers. Then, after the people were all inside, they literally burned their lungs out using various gasses. Then, they put the bodies into a mass corps disposal network.
How does this compare in any way with what this man is accused of doing? This man is accused of pursuing gurilla fighters into a house that happened to have innocent women and children inside.
Where is your head? You are completely out of touch with both history and reality.
What happened in Haditha was no doubt a tragedy, but, this young man and his troops are in NO WAY "war criminals". They are in NO WAY comparable to Nazis. There is simply no way to connect the two.
Obviously, you've never been to Eastern Europe. I strongly encourage you to go there and really see what the Nazis did.
Think Hiroshima, Nagasaki, My Lai, Panama, Haditha, Abu Ghaib, Guantanamo......the list goes on and on.
This is in addition to the epidemic of soldier on soldier rape and sexual assault which is almost never prosecuted in the name of secrecy.
Why anyone would want to respect an institution as violent, unjust, homophobic, misogyntic and savage as the US military is beyond me. If anything, the violence perpetrated by the US military helps the US become more hated resented and feared by the day.