"Occupy" targets courts over campaign funding

CBS
NEW YORK - Protesters plan to "occupy" courthouses in more than 100 cities across the U.S. on Friday to protest a landmark U.S. Supreme Court decision that removed most limits on corporate and labor spending in federal elections.
The grassroots coalition, called Move to Amend, said the protest will kick off petition drives to gain support for a constitutional amendment that would overturn Citizens United v. FEC, a 2010 court ruling that allowed private groups to spend huge amounts on political campaigns with few restrictions. Occupy Wall Street activists are joining the protest.
"The courts created the idea that the corporation is a person with constitutional rights," said David Cobb, an Occupy the Courts organizer. "It's the justification for the whole corporate takeover of our government."
Activists plan to rattle S.F. financial districtA last-minute court dispute left the status of the protest in New York City unclear. A judge on Thursday ruled that demonstrators do not have a First Amendment right to protest in front of a Manhattan federal courthouse.
Protesters had filed a lawsuit asking the judge to overturn the government's rejection of their permit application. The permit had been denied on grounds that the courthouse poses unique security concerns.
In light of the ruling, protesters did not announce whether the event would be moved to another location.
Popular on CBSNews.com
- Port Authority releases photo of One WTC workers at dizzying heights 137 Comments
- Massive train collision takes down highway overpass
- Washington state bridge collapses 20 Photos
- Thousands of U.S. bridges vulnerable to collapse
- Best U.S. beaches 2013 10 Photos
- Bridge collapse blamed on tractor-trailer 329 Comments
- Deadly Angel Flight crash in upstate New York
- Texas flooding turns deadly















Remember, they didn't call it the Arab Winter.
Humans are human. And being human, "self" will almost always come first. If someone were to offer me a job paying 100 times more than the average for that type of position paid, you bet I'd take it! I wouldn't turn down the job because it "wasn't fair" to every body else in that type of job. Even if it really wasn't fair.
So don't expect occupying Wall Street to accomplish anything. It's the folks up on Capitol Hill (president, legislators and supreme court justices) that are making the rules that not only allow, but also encourage, this kind of disparity.
(For those with their heads still up their backsides, the "Occupy" movement has never asked for "free stuff" or anything not earned. It's not like they think billionaires should hand out their money to them.)
We need to be protesting outside the Capitol building, outside the White House, and outside the Supreme Court building, as well as other courthouses.
It is THE GOVERNMENT (not private wealth) that belongs to 100% of the American people, and not just the 1%. It's time we took it back, and camping out next to the New York stock exchange accomplishes nothing.
Several states have been pushing insane laws to elevate the punishment to execution for prisoners who are convicted of causing the death of a police or search dog... are likely no different than the Supreme Court recognizing an "artificial person" as a corporation. But unlike the former case, there is no "EXECUTION" of a corporation...perhaps the whole management team and boards of directors will be subject to the punishment?
That would be a whole new approach of jeopardy for corporations to be INCARCERATED or EXECUTED for crimes of fraud, manslaughter or murder.... but then...it is for money, and we know who the money party is, right?