Occupy Wall Street returns to Zuccotti Park

Occupy Wall Street protesters make signs in Zuccotti Park, Tuesday, Jan. 10, 2012, in New York. / AP Photo

NEW YORK - Barricades surrounding a park that served as a camp for Occupy Wall Street protesters were removed Tuesday, allowing protesters to stream back in.

The atmosphere was celebratory but calm on Tuesday evening as about 300 protesters began filling New York City's Zuccotti Park a couple of hours after the barricades were taken down and a day after a complaint about the barricades was filed with the city. Protesters milled around, eating lasagna on paper plates and playing chess.

Security guards who were previously guarding the barricades stood off to the side, along with a handful of police officers. It was a minor victory for the protesters, who have complained about financial inequality in demonstrations that gained traction across the globe.

"Word spread pretty quickly, and we ran down here," demonstrator Lauren DiGioia said. "It's hard to remember what it was like before the barricades were put up."

Special Section: Occupy Wall Street Protests
Occupy's role in election unclear after Iowa
Occupy protesters arrested at Paul, Dems HQ

Police spokesman Paul Browne said the NYPD and Brookfield Office Properties, the park's owner, had been talking about removing the barriers last week. The decision was made to remove them Tuesday because officials felt they were no longer necessary, Browne said.

Brookfield spokeswoman Melissa Coley confirmed in an email that the barricades were taken down but declined to comment further. A Brookfield employee who refused to give his name told an Associated Press reporter: "The barriers are down, but the other rules are the same."

Some Occupy protesters planned to stay overnight, DiGioia said, but it was unclear whether they planned to use tents or sleeping bags, which have been banned from the lower Manhattan park since an early morning police raid evicted protesters Nov. 15.

One security guard told a group of protesters: "No sleeping bags allowed, either, OK, folks?"

Zuccotti Park regulations, stipulated by Brookfield, ban everything from erecting tents or tarps to lying down on benches. Those rules were not enforced until the police raid, and were only made public after protesters began occupying the park on Sept. 17. Until then, the only visible rules posted in the park forbade skateboarding, rollerblading and bicycling.

Protester Jeff Brewer said he tried to erect a tent but it was quickly taken down by security guards.

"I was still putting in the poles when they showed up," Brewer said. "Our food is in, our library is up. I think it's going to be a big celebration for us in the park right now."

On Monday, civil rights groups filed a complaint with the city's buildings department saying the barricades were a violation of city zoning law because they restricted public access to the space. The New York Civil Liberties Union commended the removal of the barricades in a statement late Tuesday.

"We're pleased the city is finally giving the park back to the people," said NYCLU Executive Director Donna Lieberman. "We hope Zuccotti Park can now resume its rightful place as a center for meeting and protest in New York City."

"I certainly think the political pressure and public pressure and the letter from the civil rights lawyers' organizations all brought to bear on the city and Brookfield and made them consider acting a little more reasonably, at least for now," said Gideon Oliver, one of the attorneys representing the demonstrators.

Since the eviction, members of the public had only been able to enter the park through two checkpoints that were guarded by police officers or security personnel.

The granite plaza near the New York Stock Exchange is one of more than 500 "bonus plazas" in the city: privately owned public parks born of a little-known compromise struck in 1961 between the city and developers. According to the compromise, in exchange for building a towering skyscraper, developers had to also construct a plaza that would provide "light and air" for passers-by. The bigger the plaza, the taller the building could be.

Virtually all bonus plazas are required to be open 24 hours a day, barring a safety issue. They are governed by specific regulations in the zoning law. For example, the law states that the layout of such plazas must promote public use and easy pedestrian circulation throughout the space.

The complaint accused the city of failing to enforce the law by allowing the barricades to exist. Buildings department spokesman Tony Sclafani said Monday that inspectors had found no problems at the park.

[raymailhot]

The tea party is to be ignored and democrats embrace the ows. ?

Lets see:?

The primary stand of the tea party is they want to control spending. ?They represent the 53% that pay taxes.

The primary stand of the ows is to destroy the 53% that pay taxes. ?They represent the insane?

[ProtestMoveOn]

It's time to bring in the National Guard. I've had it with these deadbeats.

http://www.facebook.com/ProtestMoveOn

[js2212]

I might actually sympathize with some of the OWS concerns but here's the problem: OWS members exhibit only a rudimentary understanding of our existing economic system, show even less understanding of our basic rights (which is evident every time they spout the "Congress shall make no law..." quote when they get evicted...just stupid) and seem only able to regurgitate Socialist propaganda fed to them by organizers whose agenda the members don't bother to research. Lack of a definitive and quantifiable goal is frequently a symptom of a new movement but in this case what they are demanding can, in this case, only be cured temporarily by a wholesale shift to Socialism, which would then lead us back to right where we are when inherent corruption ensues under the new economic model as companies and people strive to influence the powers that be to favor whatever agenda they support.

[noloyalisti]

After Reagan declared the War on the Middle Class and War on the American Worker, the giant corporations literally took over the United States of America.

Since the giant corporations and the Top 1% who run them exist only to make profit, they have left the 99% out in the cold as they destroyed our freedoms and democracy.

However, as what usually happens when cold blooded, evil, uncaring and unthinking greed takes over, they overstepped their bounds and now must be neutralized. This is the year we will make it happen starting on January 20th.

[skithebumps]

So, the Occupy Wall Street kids are back. I guess they're done occupying their parents living room couch.

[credibility2]

Maybe the frigid temps will freeze their mouths shut and not presume to speak for the majority of the 99%. We don't really care what you think, feel or believe. You're irrelevant. Go and protest outside the multi-millionaire news anchors, athletes, entertainers, drug lords, etc.

[train99]

OWS protestors don't pay enough attention to nature.
The long warm spell enjoyed so far this winter (and which gave them the idea to return to the park), is coming to an untimely end.
The tents will be taken down soon - this time by the same people who are putting them up.

[14FREEK]

THIS WOULD BE A GREAT PLACE TO START

Justices, 5-4, Reject Corporate Spending Limit

By ADAM LIPTAK

Published: January 21, 2010

WASHINGTON — Overruling two important precedents about the First Amendment rights of corporations, a bitterly divided Supreme Court on Thursday ruled that the government may not ban political spending by corporations (which includes international corporations) in candidate elections. Will the Supreme Court's campaign finance decision damage democracy?

The 5-to-4 decision was a vindication, the majority said, of the First
Amendment's most basic free speech principle — that the government has no business regulating political speech. The dissenters said that
allowing corporate money to flood the political marketplace would
corrupt democracy.

Lobbyists Get Potent Weapon in Campaign Ruling (January 22, 2010)
Does Corporate Money Lead to Political Corruption? (January 24, 2010)

{ECONOMYSTIC EXTRAORDINAIRE EDITORIAL COMMENT}
This was the beginning of the END. The Supreme Court ruled that corporations can contribute as much money as they want to any political party, campaign or contender. This started the ball rolling. Even if, as is the revulsion we are witnessing, this could be changed it would literally take an act of congress; however, why would they do that. This ruling put the foxes in charge of the henhouse. In economics we call it an agency problem. Again, this would take legal action to rectify. Do you see THE problem with that?