NTSB: Ban all driver use of cell phones

(CBS/AP) 

WASHINGTON (AP) — Texting, emailing or chatting on a cellphone while driving is simply too dangerous to be allowed, federal safety investigators declared Tuesday, urging all states to impose total bans except for emergencies.

Inspired by recent deadly crashes — including one in which a teenager sent or received 11 text messages in 11 minutes before an accident — the recommendation would apply even to hands-free devices, a much stricter rule than any current state law.

The unanimous recommendation by the five-member National Transportation Safety Board would make an exception for devices deemed to aid driver safety such as GPS navigation systems

A group representing state highway safety offices called the recommendation "a game-changer."

"States aren't ready to support a total ban yet, but this may start the discussion," Jonathan Adkins, a spokesman for the Governors Highway Safety Association, said.

CBS Evening News research team found three recent incidents linked to distracted people:

NTSB chairman Deborah Hersman acknowledged the recommendation would be unpopular with many people and that complying would involve changing what has become ingrained behavior for many Americans.

While the NTSB doesn't have the power to impose restrictions, its recommendations carry significant weight with federal regulators and congressional and state lawmakers. Another recommendation issued Tuesday urges states to aggressively enforce current bans on text messaging and the use of cellphones and other portable electronic devices while driving.

"We're not here to win a popularity contest," she said. "No email, no text, no update, no call is worth a human life."

Currently, 35 states and the District of Columbia ban texting while driving, while nine states and D.C. bar hand-held cellphone use. Thirty states ban all cellphone use for beginning drivers. But enforcement is generally not a high priority, and no states ban the use of hands-free devices for all drivers.

A total cellphone ban would be the hardest to accept for many people.

Leila Noelliste, 26, a Chicago blogger and business owner, said being able to talk on the cellphone "when I'm running around town" is important to self-employed people like herself.

"I don't think they should ban cellphones because I don't think you're really distracted when you're talking, it's when you're texting," she said. When you're driving and talking, "your eyes are still on the road."

The immediate impetus for the recommendation of state bans was a deadly highway pileup near Gray Summit, Mo., last year in which a 19-year-old pickup driver sent and received 11 texts in 11 minutes just before the accident.

NTSB investigators said they are seeing increasing texting, cellphone calls and other distracting behavior by drivers in accidents involving all kinds of transportation. It has become routine to immediately request the preservation of cellphone and texting records when an investigation is begun.

In the past few years the board has investigated a train collision in which the engineer was texting that killed 25 people in Chatsworth, Calif.; a fatal accident on the Delaware River near Philadelphia in which a tugboat pilot was talking on his cellphone and using a laptop computer, and a Northwest Airlines flight that sped more than 100 miles past its destination because both pilots were working on their laptops.

Last year, a driver was dialing his cellphone when his truck crossed a highway median near Munford, Ind., and collided with a 15-passenger van. Eleven people were killed.

The board said the initial collision in the Missouri accident was caused by the inattention of the pickup driver who was texting a friend about events of the previous night. The pickup, traveling at 55 mph, hit the back of a tractor truck that had slowed for highway construction. The pickup was rear-ended by a school bus that overrode the smaller vehicle. A second school bus rammed into the back of the first bus.

The pickup driver and a 15-year-old student on one of the buses were killed. Thirty-eight other people were injured. About 50 students, mostly members of a high school band from St. James, Mo., were on the buses heading to the Six Flags St. Louis amusement park.

Missouri had a law banning drivers under 21 years old from texting while driving at the time of the crash, but wasn't aggressively enforcing the ban, board member Robert Sumwalt said.

"Without the enforcement, the laws don't mean a whole lot," he said.

The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration reported earlier this year that pilot projects in Syracuse, N.Y., and Hartford, Conn., produced significant reductions in distracted driving by combining stepped-up ticketing with high-profile public education campaigns.

Before and after each enforcement wave, NHTSA researchers observed cellphone use by drivers and conducted surveys at drivers' license offices in the two cities. They found that in Syracuse, hand-held cellphone use and texting declined by a third. In Hartford, there was a 57 percent drop in hand-held phone use, and texting behind the wheel dropped by nearly three-quarters.

However, that was with blanket enforcement by police.

The board's decision to include hands-free cellphone use in its recommendation is likely to prove especially controversial. No states currently ban hand-free use although many studies show that it is often as unsafe as hand-held phone use because drivers' minds are on their conversations rather than what's happening on the road.

Hersman pointed to an Alexandria, Va., accident the board investigated in which a bus driver talking on a hands-free phone ran into a bridge despite his being familiar with the route and the presence of warning signs that the arch was too low for his bus to clear. The roof of the bus was sheared off.

The board has previously recommended bans on texting and cellphone use by commercial truck and bus drivers and beginning drivers, but it had stopped short of calling for a ban on the use of the devices by adults behind the wheel of passenger cars.

The problem of texting while driving is getting worse despite a rush by states to ban the practice, Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood said last week. In November, Pennsylvania became the 35th state to forbid texting while driving.

About two out of 10 American drivers overall — and half of drivers between 21 and 24 — say they've thumbed messages or emailed from the driver's seat, according to a survey of more than 6,000 drivers by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration.

However, the survey found that many drivers don't think it's dangerous when they do it — only when others do.

At any given moment last year on America's streets and highways, nearly one in every 100 car drivers was texting, emailing, surfing the Web or otherwise using a hand-held electronic device, the safety administration said. Those activities were up 50 percent over the previous year.

Driver distraction wasn't the only significant safety problem uncovered by NTSB's investigation of the Missouri accident. Investigators said they believe the pickup driver was suffering from fatigue that may have eroded his judgment. He had an average of about five and a half hours of sleep a night in the days leading up to the accident and had had fewer than five hours of sleep the night before the accident, they said.

The pickup driver had no history of accidents or traffic violations, investigators said.

Investigators also found significant problems with the brakes of both school buses involved in the accident. A third school bus sent to a hospital after the accident to pick up students crashed in the hospital parking lot when that bus' brakes failed.

However, the brake problems didn't cause or contribute to the severity of the accident, investigators said.

Another issue involved the difficulty passengers had getting out of the first school bus after the accident. Its doors were unusable and passengers had to exit through an emergency window. The raised latch on the window kept catching on clothing as students tried to escape, investigators said. Escape was further slowed because the window design required one person to hold the window up in order for a second person to crawl through, they said.

It was critical for passengers to leave as quickly as possible because a large amount of fuel underneath the bus was a serious fire hazard, investigators said.

"It could have been a much worse situation if there was a fire," Donald Karol, the NTSB's highway safety director, said.

[Brokennews]

A ban will not stop people from using a cell phone while driving. Oregon has had the ban for a couple years now & from all indications there has been little effect. I see just as many people using cell phone now as before the ban. It might generate a couple extra bucks for the occational ticket, but that's about it.
It's not that a ban is a bad idea, it's just not going to be obeyed by many. It will fall into the same catagory as spitting on the sidewalk or being in the country illegally. Yeah, it's illegal, but everybody does it with little consequences!

[digger_d]

Driving with a radio, GPS or hand held cell phones are all great distractions. However, this study done by Columbia University only studied cell phone use & did not include a study involving the use of radio, GPS & passanger distractions shatan2. I disagree highly with laws prohibiting me from using a cell phone mounted or using an ear piece in my ear to talk. If you prohibit a cell phone then do the job right & prohibit the GPS, radio's, children in car seats & all other distractions that cause a driver to remove their eye's off the road for a split second while on the road. Retired from law enforcement I've heard more excuses on why the driver had an accident & very few blaming their inability to actually pay attention to the road. Stop quoting the singular study & show a study that involved all of these features. Before cell phones it was always the radio but I never heard anyone say lets ban radio's from car's. Now with GPS features you have more people taking their eye off the road for a split second than the radio yet no one is saying let's ban the GPS. The GPS is just as dangerous as texting. I highly disagree with texting but if you want to ban complete use of cell phones including those mounted or being used with an ear piece then ban radio's, GPS and all other distractions as well. It only takes a split second when removing your eye from the road to have an accident. So all split second choices I guess should be banned according to your belief's. Responsibilty equals safe driving; stupidness equals unsafe driving.

[Brokennews]

Just don't ban me from eating a Jack-in-the-Box pancake breakfast platter while I drive to work!

[bobc1493]

About ten years to late!

The ONLY time a cell phobe shoud work in a moving car is if you a dialing 911.

The morons who text or talk while driving should been charged and fined the same as driving drunk!

[Moebedda]

I am sorry. This is insulting to responsible people. People who can't walk and chew gum at the same time simply need thier license revoked. Don't punish the rest of us because of the ignorance of a few.

[bigsk8fan]

i remember how nervous i got when my kid was learning to drive and fooling around too much with the radio. i certainly believe restrictions on cell phoning and texting are appropriate.

[2happy2ride]

I hate government restrictions but I LOVE THIS IDEA. Unfortunately most laws attempt to prevent stupidity but this one is LONG overdue.

Yesterday a girl passed me while texting, she was ahead of me on a 2 lane road. She crossed the center line and hit two on-coming cars. I ran over to her car to see if she was hurt, she didn't even look up at me because she was texting.
If you don't want to make it illegal, how about if we triple the fines and automatic jail time for those involved in an accident while on the phone? Something needs to be done, too many idiots on the road.

[JV1970]

I totally agree with you!

[Moebedda]

I am sorry. This is insulting to responsible people. This girl should have her license suspended for 10 years. Don't punish the rest of us because of the ignorance of a few.

[Moebedda]

Typical big government. Let's punish everyone because a few people are irresponsible. I have a feeling that these same people that have issues using the phone while driving would have issues anyway. I saw a woman the other day stop at a stop sign while saying something to her child. She didn't even look, she just pulled out in front of the car that was in front of me. It's a good thing that both I and the person in front of me were aware of the situation. She wasn't on the phone. So what's next. Let's ban talking to people in the car? Ban radios? Ban window switches because they distract you while your driving? I can see banning texting while driving, but simply talking?

This recomendation is completey rediculous.

[2happy2ride]

Your example proved the NTSB's position. ANY diversion can result in a fatality while driving. Read the statistics, there is no difference between hands free, texting or merely a conversation, it's the lack of attention. Research also found talking in the car does not divert the drivers attention as much as a cell. You wear a seat belt don't you? And THAT only protects you, the ban would protect others.

[Moebedda]

The ban would protect others from stupid people who shouldn't be driving in the first place. I am sorry. This is insulting to responsible people. People who can't walk and chew gum at the same time simply need thier license revoked. Don't punish the rest of us because of the ignorance of a few.

[shatan2]

This is not an overreaction to specific incidents. Texting is obvious, it takes your eyes, hands and mind off the task at hand. But studies have shown the conversation on a cell phone (hands free is shown to be just as bad as handheld) is far more distracting than a conversation with a passenger. Comments here start to talking about what's next, radios etc. Listening to music can enhance concentraction (surgeons listen to music while operating sometimes). Driving is not a right. The roads are public space. We should be doing much MORE to make driving safer, not adding to the danger. You want to use your cell phone in YOUR car, fine. Just don't do it on OUR road.

[chrishazzoo]

Law enforcement have the ability to cite drivers whose driving performance suffers due to a distraction or distractions. The cause of that distraction/s is listed by the officer. Commonsense tells me that two hands holding the wheel is always safer than one, regardless of what other activity is going on in the car. I didn't need a study to tell me that, I just drove through windy territory.

[Mungam44]

For any of us who have had to take evasive action from a cell phone using driver, a total ban is needed. CT passed a law to ban hand held devices and, guess what? There is an almost total disregard for the law and the cops, to a great extent overlook the problem with people still driving in congested areas with the phone stuck to their head.
Of course a bounty on lawbreakers could be another possibility.

[Moebedda]

I am sorry. This is insulting to responsible people. People who can't walk and chew gum at the same time simply need thier license revoked. Don't punish the rest of us because of the ignorance of a few.

[TellFell]

If we ban hands-free talking on cells phone, then the next step will be single occupancy vehicles, to eliminate talking and driving all together. What a boon for the auto industry. Must be a Republican plan to increase employment.

[2happy2ride]

Think you've been in one accident too many.