AP/ December 8, 2011, 4:56 AM

Record year for billion-dollar disasters

In this Feb. 2, 2011 photo, hundreds of cars are seen stranded on Lake Shore Drive in Chicago after a winter blizzard of historic proportions wobbled an otherwise snow-tough Chicago.

In this Feb. 2, 2011 photo, hundreds of cars are seen stranded on Lake Shore Drive in Chicago after a winter blizzard of historic proportions wobbled an otherwise snow-tough Chicago. / AP

WASHINGTON - America smashed the record for billion-dollar weather disasters this year with a deadly dozen, and counting.

With an almost biblical onslaught of twisters, floods, snow, drought, heat and wildfire, the U.S. in 2011 has seen more weather catastrophes that caused at least $1 billion in damage than it did in all of the 1980s, even after the dollar figures from back then are adjusted for inflation.

The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration added two disasters to the list Wednesday, bringing the total to 12. The two are wildfires in Texas, New Mexico and Arizona and the mid-June tornadoes and severe weather.

NOAA uses $1 billion as a benchmark for the worst weather disasters.

Climate scientists: More extreme weather coming
Prominent global warming skeptic changes his mind
Video: FEMA almost broke, how did it happen?

Extreme weather in America this year has killed more than 1,000 people, according to National Weather Service Director Jack Hayes. The dozen billion-dollar disasters alone add up to $52 billion.

The old record for $1 billion disasters was nine, in 2008.

Hayes, a meteorologist since 1970, said he has never seen a year for extreme weather like this, calling it "the deadly, destructive and relentless 2011."

This year's total may not stop at 12. Officials are still adding up the damage from the Tropical Storm Lee and the pre-Halloween Northeast snowstorm, and so far each is at $750 million. And there's still nearly a month left in the year.

Scientists blame an unlucky combination of global warming and freak chance. They say even with the long-predicted increase in weather extremes triggered by manmade climate change, 2011 in the U.S. was wilder than they had predicted. For example, the six large outbreaks of tornadoes cannot be attributed to global warming, scientists say.

"The degree of devastation is extreme in and of itself, and it would be tempting to say it's a sign of things to come, though we would be hard-pressed to see such a convergence of circumstances occurring in one single year again for a while," said Jerry Meehl, a climate scientist at the National Center for Atmospheric Research in Boulder, Colorado.

Another factor in the rising number of billion-dollar calamities: "More people and more stuff in harm's way," such as in coastal areas, said NOAA Administrator Jane Lubchenco.

"What we're seeing this year is not just an anomalous year, but a harbinger of things to come," with heat waves, droughts and other extreme weather, Lubchenco said Wednesday at an American Geophysical Union science conference in San Francisco.

The number of weather catastrophes that pass the billion-dollar mark when adjusted into constant dollars is increasing with each decade. In the 1980s, the country averaged slightly more than one a year. In the 1990s, it was 3.8 a year. It jumped to 4.6 in the first decade of this century. And in the past two years, it has averaged 7.5.

Other years had higher overall damage figures because of one gargantuan disaster, such as Hurricane Katrina in 2005 and a 1988 drought.

But this is not just about numbers.

"Each of these events is a huge disaster for victims who experience them," Lubchenco said in an email. "They are an unprecedented challenge for the nation."

Half the billion-dollar disasters were tornado outbreaks in one of the deadliest years on record. More than 540 people were killed in those six tragedies. In four days in April, there were 343 tornadoes in the largest outbreak on record, including 199 in one day, which is another record.

Texas had more than a million acres burned by wildfire, a record for the state, and Oklahoma set a record for the hottest month ever in the United States. The Ohio River Valley had triple the normal rainfall, which caused major flooding along the Mississippi River.

"Too little water in the South, too much water in the North," said Andrew Weaver, a climate scientist at the University of Victoria in Canada. "It's a story we are hearing more and more often."

That's why the world has to do two things, said Princeton University geological sciences professor Michael Oppenheimer: try to slow global warming by reducing greenhouse gas emissions and prepare better for extreme weather.

© 2011 The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
17 Comments Add a Comment
linkicon reporticon emailicon
cbs4111 says:
Complete NONSENSE.

Let's say a weather disaster hit during the time of the Pilgrims but there were only a few teepees and huts to get damaged - no billion-dollar disaster. As the population has grown, there are more and more cities, and more and more investments have been made in buildings and other infrastructure. Inflation has also artificially increased the value of those densely packed investments so the dollar value of the damage for the exact same weather event has SKYROCKETED. The dollar value is now much larger, but weather events ARE NOT intensifying. The weather isn't getting weirder, PERIOD.

Don't believe it? Just search on "the weather isn't getting weirder".

The truth is that extreme left-wing liberal loons are exaggerating the weather to forward their nutcase agenda.

Here's an inconvenient fact - the US just broke the all-time record for the longest period between >CAT 3 hurricanes making landfall. It's now 2235 days.

Don't believe it? Just search on "longest period on record without a major hurricane in the US".

Since records have been taken, never before has it been so long between major hurricanes. Want to know why? IT'S BECAUSE HURRICANE FREQUENCY AND HURRICANE ENERGY HAVE DROPPED IN THE LAST 20 YEARS. You can find that fact by searching on the web too.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Forty-Four says:
ninja,
I never said that they were un-biased. Yours are not un-biased either. You don't have to have heard of it. The fact is, you don't seem to have a productive counterargument, so you just dismiss what I/we post as "biased" and "incorrect."
reply
Forty-Four replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Exactly. Every source which is trying to argue something is biased to an extent. Biased towards their argument, well, more biased towards their argument than the other. To say that his sources are unbiased is absolute crap. Even I say that we, as humans, have SOMETHING to do with it, but it is not our fault. (integration)
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Forty-Four says:
by EmpireGeorge___-- December 8, 2011 2:07 PM EST
Forty-Four, the way they dispute what you say, is they say "but this warming is happening at a much accelerated pace, then those numerous ice ages and warming periods, thousands or millions of years ago.

So, to them, the accelerated pace alone, apparently "proves" it's man, and not a natural warming trend.

Don't question, don't challenge, don't even discuss other warming contributors, because if you do, they will just label you as a denier, uneducated and a whole assortment of things and terms, because genuine scientific inquiry and any contrary data, must be immediately dismissed, because it eats away at their assertions
_________________________________________________________
The way that I dispute it is with the release of the CO2 trapped within the ice. That goes into the atmosphere, accellerating the melting process naturally. Plants take care of that eventually, and we go back into cooling. We may be cutting down trees and what not, but we still have something. That will take care of it eventually. Natural
reply
Forty-Four replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Keep in mind, I am not saying it is completely natural. I think we have a little bit to do with it, but I don't buy that it is entirely our fault...I don't even think we are doing enough to cause warming without those other factors.
linkicon reporticon emailicon
cbs4111 says:
Complete NONSENSE. Let's say a weather disaster hit during the time of the Pilgrims. No one was there to see it, and there were only a few teepees to get damaged - no billion dollar disaster. As more and more investments have been made in buildings and other infrastructure, and as inflation has artificially increased the value of those investments, the dollar value of the damage for the same weather event has SKYROCKETED. The weather isn't getting weirder, period. Weather events ARE NOT intensifying.

Don't believe it? Just search on "the weather isn't getting weirder". The truth is that extreme left-wing liberal loons are exaggerating the weather to forward their agenda.

Here's an inconvenient fact - the US just broke the all-time record for the longest period between >CAT 3 hurricanes making landfall. It's now 2235 days.

Don't believe it? Just search on "longest period on record without a major hurricane in the US".

Since records have been taken, never before has it been so long between major hurricanes. Want to know why? BECAUSE HURRICANE FREQUENCY AND HURRICANE ENERGY HAVE DROPPED.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
canislupus16 says:
Apparently there are some in the "business" community who now actually believe we are experiencing climate change, and at least in part it is caused by humans' activities. These "business" interests are led by the insurance industry, the companies who will actually have to shell out for the disasters. This is going to cost all of us more in the form of higher premiums, higher deductibles, and more out of pocket expense. Those who do not give credence to global climate change and man's part in it are nothing more than selfish, self-centered morons who want the rest of us to carry the cost of their lifestyles. There will come a time when enough people will say.... enough.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
dickkahrs says:
The Federal government is the biggest disaster facing us! That's the only problem we can do anything about.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Forty-Four says:
That picture is kind of funny. I don't have any snow in my yard yet, and I live in mid-Michigan.
reply
Forty-Four replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Ya, that is true. I wouldn't contribute it to "global warming" since it is cold as f*** up here, just no snow yet.
Forty-Four replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Global warming is a natural phenominon that occurs every some-odd thousand years. It will reverse itself, but I have no idea when. I am not an expert in that type of thing
linkicon reporticon emailicon
parisdakar says:
Hold on climate changers. There are other factors at work. Don't forget that there's been a huge increase in spending across the board on disaster response. Every disaster forever after Katrina will now cost much more due to the huge mobilization of disaster resources that is now, not just needed, but expected.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
tsigili says:
Compared to the hundreds of billions Obama has thrown away on foreign aid, and worthless, unproductive spending, that's chicken feed.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
sepa2 says:
is n't this other disasters growth opportunities under the type of capitalism we have
reply
See all 17 Comments