
Occupy LA protesters block the streets around Los Angeles City Hall before the midnight deadline by Los Angeles city officials to shut down the encampment on November 27, 2011 in Los Angeles, California. / Kevork Djansezian/Getty Images
LOS ANGELES - Los Angeles police used nearly a dozen undercover detectives to infiltrate the Occupy LA encampment before this week's raid to gather information on the anti-Wall Street protesters' intentions, according to media reports Friday.
None of the officers slept at the camp, but they tried to blend in during the weeks leading up to the raid to learn about plans to resist or use weapons against police, a police source told the Los Angeles Times. The source spoke on the condition of anonymity because the case is ongoing.
The undercover work yielded information that some protesters were preparing bamboo spears and other potentially dangerous weapons in advance of an expected eviction, none of which were used, according to the City News Service, which first reported the story.
Occupy looks to hone agenda after camps fade
Occupyers warn of a winter of discontent
200 arrested as cops raid Occupy LA camp
Police downplayed the significance of the undercover work since Occupy meetings were public and easily tracked.
Police officer Cleon Joseph declined an Associated Press request for comment on the reports.
Occupy L.A. protester Mario Brito told City News Service he was not surprised by the revelation, but said it was "tantamount to 1950s McCarthyism."
Meanwhile, the city attorney's office filed criminal misdemeanor charges Friday against 27 more of the people who were arrested following the police sweep of the camp.
In all, 46 of the 291 people arrested during the raid have been charged with misdemeanor crimes of failure to disperse from an unlawful assembly. Some also were charged with resisting arrest.
The arrests came Wednesday during a pre-dawn raid on City Hall Park, where nearly 500 tents had been erected.
The Democrats created a class of 'perpetual victims' in order to maintain their label as champions of the oppressed, otherwise they'd have no political power whatsoever.
graph (4), the Armed Forces of the United States
429
\ S 1867 ES
1 shall hold a person described in paragraph (2) who
2 is captured in the course of hostilities authorized by
3 the Authorization for Use of Military Force (Public
4 Law 107-40) in military custody pending disposition
5 under the law of war.
Thought I'd share this comment I read earlier today, one with which I fully agree.
Great job LAPD, keep up the good work.
Would you like undercover police to come to your next convection to help with plans to break your group apart. If that thought bothers you in the least bit, you are nothing more than a closeminded bigot.
Other than that, I agree wholeheartedly with you.
I personally feel that the NDAA (National Defense Authorization Act) is an abomination, but a detainee held under this provision can still claim the right to habeus review by the courts. READ IT.
http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/z?c112:S.1867:
This is taken from your document directly. I am assumning you did not rad 962 pages...
1. The
2 Secretary of Defense may, in consultation with the
3 Secretary of State and the Director of National In4
telligence, waive the requirement of paragraph (1) if
5 the Secretary submits to Congress a certification in
6 writing that such a waiver is in the national security
7 interests of the United States.
2.The
2 Secretary of Defense may, in consultation with the
3 Secretary of State and the Director of National In4
telligence, waive the requirement of paragraph (1) if
5 the Secretary submits to Congress a certification in
6 writing that such a waiver is in the national security
7 interests of the United States.
This Bill has left so many loopholes that anything can be done. There would be years of legal wrangling before they could prove or diporve whether habeus corpus applies in any spefic instant...
That makes being detained an indefinite process. Be realistic here. Not naive.
--------------
Is this what you want for your country???
We all need a good slap in the face once in a while. Here is yours. You are a mindless sheep who has lost the ability to look at things from a fair and unibaised vantage point.
Please take that not as an insult but as a wake up call. I have been a mindless follower at one point in my life too...
That is such a lie, it takes away any credibility you may have otherwise had. Among any group there are *some* bad apples (including among the OWS crowd). But to claim, regarding police, that "most of them most of the time are dishonest" is an outrageous lie.
I grant you, there are *some* among the police who are dishonest. Nobody could reasonably argue otherwise. But MOST of them are willing to put their lives on the line to protect the general public.