AP/ November 29, 2011, 8:28 AM

Debate over obese children vs. parental rights

CBS/AP

CLEVELAND — The case of an 8-year-old Cleveland Heights boy taken from his family because he weighs more than 200 pounds has renewed a debate on whether parents should lose custody if a child is severely obese.

The boy was removed from his family and was placed in foster care in October after county case workers said his mother wasn't doing enough to control his weight. The boy, at his weight, is considered at risk for developing such diseases as diabetes and high blood pressure. Government growth charts say most boys his age weigh about 60 pounds.

Roughly 2 million U.S. children are extremely obese — weighing significantly more than what's considered healthy.

Cuyahoga County removed the boy because case workers considered the mother's inability to get his weight down a form of medical neglect. The county's Children and Family Services agency said Monday it stood by its custody move, which was approved by a judge.

"We have worked very hard with this family for 20 months before it got to this point," agency Administrator Patricia Rideout said.

Rideout said the issue has created a buzz among agency staff members and she has heard it was a popular Internet item. She said she was following state law in withholding the boy's name in his best interest.

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's Division of Nutrition, Physical Activity and Obesity tries to address the roles of nutrition and physical activity in improving public health and preventing and controlling chronic diseases. It says achieving and maintaining a healthy weight is part of an ongoing lifestyle that can be adopted. It offers resources to help people determine which foods are needed for a healthy diet and promotes regular physical activity to reduce the risk for diseases and control weight.

There's no easy answer when it comes to determining who's to blame in such obesity cases, said Dr. Naim Alkhouri, who works with overweight children and their families at Cleveland Clinic Children's Hospital and leads its pediatric metabolic clinic.

"It's not only the parents or the child," he said. "Obesity is an epidemic in the United States. As a society we're all responsible."

It's not enough to just encourage some children to eat healthier and exercise, he said, because there's also "a big psychological component."

"When it comes to involving the authorities, I don't think we have clear guidelines," he said. "Starting the debate is a good thing. We need more guidance on how to react to the issue."

County workers were alerted to the boy's weight early last year after his mother took him to a hospital for breathing problems. He was diagnosed with sleep apnea, which is characterized by pauses in breathing during sleep and can be weight-related, and he was given a breathing machine.

Parents have lost custody of obese children a few times in the United States, and an opinion piece in the Journal of the American Medical Association in July said putting children temporarily in foster care is in some cases more ethical than obesity surgery, which can involve removing part of the stomach.

Dr. David Ludwig, an obesity specialist at Harvard-affiliated Children's Hospital Boston, said the point isn't to blame parents but rather to act in children's best interest and get them help their parents can't provide.

Dr. Norman Fost, a medical ethicist at the University of Wisconsin's Madison campus, said Monday that foster care wouldn't cure the Ohio boy's obesity but might help.

"The goal is to make him less obese," he said.

Fost said the boy's sleep apnea could be related to his weight and could be imminently dangerous. A target weight of 150 pounds might improve the apnea problem, he said.

The boy's mother said she has worked on the weight issue.

"They are trying to make it seem like I am unfit, like I don't love my child," she told The Plain Dealer newspaper, which didn't reveal her identity because the case could involve abuse.

A public defender, Sam Amata, said Monday the custody removal would be challenged based on the contention that the boy is not in imminent danger.

"We don't feel there's that kind of requisite danger," he said.

© 2011 The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
20 Comments Add a Comment
linkicon reporticon emailicon
MariePearle says:
I would like to know what this mother was feeding her kid. Why didn't they make her keep a food diary of some sort? Most weight loss programs encourage you to write down everything you eat.

Also, has the kid been checked for medical problems? If he's diabetic and not being treated, that could make his weight problem worse. Also, what about depression? Some people eat when they are depressed, and gaining lots of weight doesn't exactly help depression symptoms go away. I hope he gets the medical treatment he needs.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
noloyalisti says:
This is an excellent example of why we need smart government regulation to do what is the best thing for the society as a whole. It is why we need to government to provide universal single payer health care.

It is also a comment on why you can't have Republicons run anything at any level of government. They believe in a Wild West mentality of people doing whatever they want and let the free market deal with it. Especially if you are rich. Are they just nuts or what?
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
tomanyt says:
Why doesn't the state take children away from alcoholic/drug addicted parents? Clearly they are a danger to the health and well being of their kids.
reply
phuyay replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
To take a child away from a parent that is on drugs requires a blood test and liberals say this is an invasion of privacy. A Florida judge has already ruled that drug testing of welfare recipints cannot be done. What is practical and sound reasoning has ben lost in the pursuit of political correctness.
helloall34 replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
The alcoholic/drug addicted parent is still often better then state care (sad but true).
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Drivelphobe001 says:
The kids are just like the parents, so let nature take its course. The taxpayer and our nosey government should stay out of it. What a waste of time and money to fight genetics and stupidity.
reply
Drivelphobe001 replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
How ya' doin AD?
linkicon reporticon emailicon
morris2196 says:
Given that CFS worked with this family for 20 months to no avail, removing the child from the home makes sense to me. But is this a long-term solution?
reply
tomanyt replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
And so what if the kid doesn't loose the weight while in custody. Then what?
linkicon reporticon emailicon
6478 says:
If someone gave your child poison to eat, you would stop it. If some types of food (high sugar, high fat, high calorie) become poison because they are causing high weight gain you would stop it. Or maybe you as the parent are also partially addicted to these bad foods, and you have less will to stop eating these things your self. You also have less will to listen to your child complaining that they always want these dangerous foods. An 8 year old does not buy anything you as parent have not given them the money to buy. An 8 year old does not have anything to eat in your home that you have not purchased. If the parent will not control what they brought into their own home, and what the child spends money on, then you as the parent are failing your child, possibly to the point where you are putting your child in danger.
reply
tomanyt replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Stop being so overly simplistic. Weight gain is not just about over eating.
enough-already replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
by tomanyt November 29, 2011 9:44 AM EST
Stop being so overly simplistic. Weight gain is not just about over eating.

Oh really? Stop eating for about 2 weeks and then tell us weight gain is not related to eating.
linkicon reporticon emailicon
OmegaWolf747 says:
The state should stay out of private family affairs.
reply
enough-already replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Really? How about if Dad is having sex with his young daughters? That's "his business"? You're strange.
linkicon reporticon emailicon
phuyay says:
The country is not rich enough to take care of children or adults that disregard good health practices. Before taking a child out of the home, parents and obese children, not suffering from a medical condition that produces obesity, should be made to attend exercise and good health practices training. If they do not comply, then taking the child out of the home might be warranted. This would have to apply to all families with private insurance and those on Medicare.
reply
enough-already replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
"parents and obese children, not suffering from a medical condition that produces obesity, should be made to attend exercise and good health practices training."

Do you think this "training" is FREE? You start out by saying the country isn't rich enough to take care of overweight people, and in the next breath you propose sending them to exercise classes and nutritional training classes. Which is it? Can we afford it or not?
phuyay replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Exercise classes and health education are cheaper than treating diabeites and heart problems. Have you been to a doctor lately? As a child becomes an adult, there is also high blood pressure and joint and bone deterioration from being over weight. Ok, we'll do it your way - keep people stupid and sick and pay for their excesses or the rest of their lives. Actually, you will be paying for them; I'm retiring and keeping my income low so I will pay no taxes.
linkicon reporticon emailicon
voxpopulus says:
If I put heroin into my kid's veins, he or she would be taken from me. If I kill him or her with calories, some people would say it's fine.
reply
formerusmcsgt1 replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Exactly, but killing kids with food is just fine with some people - probably gluttons themselves.....
See all 20 Comments