AP/ November 23, 2011, 11:20 AM

FBI arrests 7 Amish on hate crimes charges

From left, Johnny Mullet, Lester Mullet, Daniel Mullet, Levi Miller and Eli Miller wait to make their pleas in Holmes County Municipal Court in Millersburg, Ohio Wednesday, Oct. 19, 2011.

From left, Johnny Mullet, Lester Mullet, Daniel Mullet, Levi Miller and Eli Miller wait to make their pleas in Holmes County Municipal Court in Millersburg, Ohio Wednesday, Oct. 19, 2011. / Mike Schenck,AP Photo/The Daily Record

Last Updated 5:34 p.m. ET

MILLERSBURG, Ohio - The leader of a breakaway Amish group allowed the beatings of those who disobeyed him, made some members sleep in a chicken coop and had sexual relations with married women to "cleanse them," federal authorities said as they charged him and six others with hate crimes in hair-cutting attacks against other Amish.

Authorities raided the group's compound in eastern Ohio on Wednesday morning and arrested seven men, including group leader Sam Mullet and three of his sons.

Several members of the group carried out the attacks in September and October by forcefully cutting the beards and hair of Amish men and women, authorities said. Cutting the hair is a highly offensive act to the Amish, who believe the Bible instructs women to let their hair grow long and men to grow beards and stop shaving once they marry.

The attacks struck at the core of the Amish identity and tested their principles. They strongly believe that they must be forgiving in order for God to forgive them, which often means handing out their own punishment and not reporting crimes to law enforcement.

The attacks had terrorized Amish communities, Sheriff Fred Abdalla said at a news conference Wednesday.

"You've got Amish all over the state of Ohio and Pennsylvania and Indiana that are concerned. We've received hundreds and hundreds of calls from people living in fear," he said. "They are buying Mace, some are sitting with shotguns, getting locks on their doors because of Sam Mullet."

The sheriff added, "Sam Mullet is evil."

Sam Mullet stands in front of his Bergholz, Ohio home on Monday. Oct. 10, 2011.

/ AP Photo/Amy Sancetta
Mullet told The Associated Press in October that he didn't order the hair-cutting but didn't stop his sons and others from carrying it out. He said the goal was to send a message to other Amish that they should be ashamed of themselves for the way they were treating Mullet and his community.

"They changed the rulings of our church here, and they're trying to force their way down our throat, make us do like they want us to do, and we're not going to do that," Mullet said.

U.S. Attorney Steven Dettelbach said Wednesday that religious differences should be a matter of theological debate, not disputes "resolved by late night visits to people's homes with weapons and violent attacks." He said he did not know how often hate crimes involve intradenominational disputes.

The seven men were in custody and expected to be arraigned Wednesday in Youngstown. They include Mullet; his sons Johnny, Lester and Daniel; Levi Miller; Eli Miller; and Emanuel Schrock. The charges carry a penalty of up 10 years in prison.

Prosecutor Steve Knowling, who filed state charges against five of the same defendants last month, said he would dismiss those counts and let federal prosecutors take the lead in the case.

In the state case, an Amish bishop and his son said they were held down while men used scissors and a clipper to cut their beards. Similar attacks were under investigation in Amish communities in eastern and northeastern Ohio.

A defense attorney in the state case, Andy Hyde, said Sam Mullet would fight the federal charges. Hyde said he didn't know if he would represent Mullet in federal court.

The seven men were sleeping when the FBI and local police showed up at their homes before dawn Wednesday, Abdalla said. Three men initially refused to come out of their rooms, but all seven were arrested without incident, he said.

The attacks came amid long-simmering tension between Amish bishops and Mullet's group, which he established in 1995.

An FBI affidavit said Johnny, Lester and Daniel Mullet and Levi and Eli Miller all confessed in early October to taking part in at least a couple of the attacks.

Johnny Mullet told detectives that it was his idea to cut the hair and beards and that he discussed the idea with his father, who gave him the addresses of two victims, the affidavit said.

Lester Mullet told detectives that after two attacks in late September, the men went home and told Sam Mullet what happened. He said his father laughed and called them nuts, the court document said.

Abdalla, the sheriff, said he didn't know the specifics of the religious disagreements that prompted Mullet to form his own community in 1995.

But the heart of his recent dispute with Amish bishops stemmed from his desire to excommunicate several members, the FBI said. Other bishops concluded the excommunications weren't consistent with Amish teachings and scripture and decided not to recognize the penalties, the FBI said.

One of Mullet's daughters-in-law and a former brother-in-law told investigators that Mullet controls everything that happens within the community outside Bergholz and that he allowed others to beat members of the group who disobeyed him, according to an affidavit filed in federal court Wednesday.

Mullet punished some by making them sleep in a chicken coop for days and was sexually intimate with married women in the community so that he could "cleanse them of the devil," the two said in the affidavit.

Both said they left the community because they did not want to live under Mullet's control.

Authorities said previously that some Amish refused to press charges, following their practice of avoiding involvement the courts.

Dettelbach alluded to the issue, saying: "It is not the victim's job to decide or to bring charges. I think that's a message I would like people to understand. These charges in this case are the result of our independent determination that crimes occurred."

Stephen Anthony, head of the FBI in northern Ohio, said hate crimes are a priority for the agency.

"The message we'd like to send should be clear that the FBI and all of our law enforcement partners represented here today take civil rights violations very, very seriously," he said.

Ohio has an estimated Amish population of just under 61,000 -- second only to Pennsylvania -- with most living in rural counties south and east of Cleveland.

They have a modest lifestyle and are deeply religious. Their traditions of traveling by horse and buggy and forgoing most modern conveniences distance themselves from the outside world and symbolize a yielding to a collective order.

Jefferson County Sheriff Fred Abdalla, left, looks on as Lester Mullet, center, and his brother Johnny Mullet review papers at a hearing in Steubenville, Ohio, Oct. 11, 2011.

/ AP Photo/Steubenville Herald Star-Mark Law

© 2011 The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
71 Comments Add a Comment
linkicon reporticon emailicon
1MsOhio says:
When you attack a person or harass based on race, the FBI is involved because frequently the local law enforcement reflects the values of the persecutors. (As evidenced by the ignorant posts here of folks failing to understand how these crimes are based on hate.) The only way justice can be served is by bringing in an independent body to prosecute -- thus, the hate crime law.

Some folks here need to read up. The Internet has a rich history on this subject. Start with the Southern Poverty Law Center website. It has a wealth of reading on ALL types of hate crimes and why we need to prosecute folks who commit crimes based on bias and hate.

You might also want to take the online test from the "Implicit Association Test" from Harvard University to check your own biases. It might expose something you need to deal with and explain why you fail to understand how this is a crime.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
creeper00 says:
This is reprehensible. But tell me...how is it a "hate crime" when one member of a religion attacks another. By this standard, couldn't all crimes against persons be called "hate crimes"?

Either that was one stupid law or no one has a clue what it meant.
reply
aChangeOfIdeas replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
one group was a breakaway group, I think they considered themselves different just as Catholics consider themselves different from Lutherans.
1MsOhio replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
ANY crime committed based on religion, sexism, bigotry, etc. is considered a hate crime, it doesn't matter WHO is doing the hating.
linkicon reporticon emailicon
LoadedAndDangerous says:
You're white so you can be charged with hate crimes. Whites can be charged with this and minorities can't. I can prove it, the statistics back me up on this. Welcome to double standard America. I just laugh at the "so called" hate crimes because it's a joke. Several African American thugs here in Columbia South Carolina jumped a white kid a while back and almost beat him to death but that wasn't a hate crime because the victim was white. It didn't help thought that the mayor of Columbia and the police chief are black. I rest my case.
reply
1MsOhio replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
ANY crime committed by ANYONE based on religion, race, etc. is considered a hate crime. If blacks attacked a white person based on a race, then that is a hate crime. That's the definition. Proving a hate crime is difficult in most cases.
linkicon reporticon emailicon
phwtb100 says:
Those of you who seem to think this is funny, should truly be horrified by this. You may not agree with their beliefs, you might not even agree with their culture, BUT no one can argue the point that they are the most gentle of all the people who live in the US. They have just as much right to practice their religion AND be protected BECAUSE of their religion, as you do yours, even if your ignorant enough to be practicing atheism.

We get mad when we hear of a bully pushing around a kid on the play ground. We get angry when we hear about someone committing a hate crime against another because they are a homosexual, or a different race (except for white, heterosexual folks who seem to have no right to file a hate crime), but you sit in here on your pedestals laughing at this people because it was THEM - those strange dressing, long bearded, funny hair cut, horse and buggy people- that were the attacked.

How sad is that?

You're all ready to make fun of something you don't understand simply because you don't understand. That doesn't make any of you cute, or funny, or even intelligent. It just makes you the very same as a racist, only instead of color, religion is your trigger.

Is it any wonder the Amish want absolutely nothing to do with you and YOUR culture? How sad it is to see so many that are willing to stand in a circle WATCHING while another- much weaker than you- is attacked.

How sad indeed.

Enjoy your holiday. Maybe you can give thanks to the TV for giving you a football game to go with your beer. As for me and mine, we will be thanking the LORD for all of HIS gifts and praying for each and everyone of you to wake up before it's too late.
reply
1MsOhio replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Well put. I personally believe the Amish are a cult (from my personal experience), but the group has the right to live in peace and practice ANY religion they want in America. This article is proof that America supports religious diversity and celebrates any culture! May we continue to do so!
JV1970 replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
phwtb100 You are absolutely right and I agree with everything you said!
linkicon reporticon emailicon
DDAZ says:
Religion gone amuck.. Those beards always kill me.. Look like they are held on by rubberbands or ear hooks.. LOL
reply
JV1970 replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
YOU'RE gone "amuck"! You criticise others when you can't even spell amok! Also apparently you either know nothing about the constitution or you're one of those who want to change it to read freedom FROM religion in stead of freedom OF religion!
linkicon reporticon emailicon
take_a_number says:
Those 7 would make good congressmen.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
voxpopulus says:
With a name like Johnny Mullet, no wonder he's obsessed with people's hair.
reply
FL_Son replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
LOL.. good one ! I thought so chicks would have had sex if I said it was to cleanse them of the devil ? WHOA ! Why didn't I know this in high school ! DOH!
linkicon reporticon emailicon
voxpopulus says:
Amish hate crimes?

Isn't that like pacifist nuclear bombs or carnivorous vegetarians?
reply
1MsOhio replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Did you read the article?
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Americaisajoke says:
JUST ANOTHER DAY IN AMERICA ... CRAZY LAND !
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Jaylah54 says:
I'm all for freedom of (or from) religion, and that includes groups such as the Amish.

But what sort of sticks in my craw is this idea that the group deals with "infractions" within the group on its own...unless it becomes too much for them, in which case they turn to the "outside world" to maintain justice.

The Amish get a "pass" on a lot of US laws due to the whole freedom of religion thing. And I'm basically okay with that. But cutting off someone's facial hair is not, as far as I know, a civil crime in this country. It happens quite a lot in college fraternities and dorms.

Just be consistent.

The Mormon church often excommunicates its members for having pre-marital sex. But when was the last time you heard about the LDS church asking a civil court to prosecute one of their members for it?
reply
aChangeOfIdeas replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
I think if someone beat you and cut off your hair, you would consider it a civil crime, because it's assault. If someone forcibly had sex with you/your wife to "cleanse you" you would consider it rape. No one prosecutes for premarital sex because in most states it isn't illegal. The Mormon church may consider it immoral, but even in states with antiquated laws it isn't generally prosecuted unless there's the age issue and then it's considered statuatory rape anyway.
phwtb100 replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
I didn't see anything that said they were asking for a prosecution on the sexual misconduct, but rape by any other name is still rape. In my mind, it's no different here than what the Catholic church has had to deal with. We see reports of priests being caught sexually violating young boys but I haven't seen, or heard of, even one of them going to trial- or jail for that matter. What's up with that?
See all 71 Comments
Scroll Left Scroll Right