AP/ November 3, 2011, 9:58 PM

U.S. pledges financial aid for Pakistan

Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, left, speaks as Pakistan Foreign Minister Hina Rabbani Khar looks on during a joint news conference in Islamabad, Pakistan, Oct. 21, 2011.

Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, left, speaks as Pakistan Foreign Minister Hina Rabbani Khar looks on during a joint news conference in Islamabad, Pakistan, Oct. 21, 2011. / AP Photo

WASHINGTON - The Obama administration is pledging robust assistance to Pakistan despite demands on U.S. finances and a sometimes rocky relationship with Islamabad, according to a status report on Afghanistan and Pakistan.

The State Department report outlines U.S. goals in the region more than a decade after the Sept. 11 terror attacks triggered the war against al Qaeda, and the progress after billions of dollars have been spent and American lives lost. It also outlines the steps forward, looking ahead to the withdrawal of U.S. combat forces by the end of 2014.

The report was delivered to Congress on Thursday. The Associated Press obtained a copy.

"Though a tremendous amount has been accomplished, we also have no illusions about the task before us," the report said about Afghanistan. "We expect that ongoing violence, lack of institutional and human capacity, discrimination against women and vulnerable groups, and Afghanistan's incredibly low economic baseline will remain difficult challenges."

The report said the U.S. has reached its "high water mark" for civilian funding and the government in Kabul must move toward establishing revenue sources. The report said the U.S. will build a foundation for the Afghans to assume responsibility for their future.

On Pakistan, the department said the relationship with Islamabad "is not always easy, but it is vital to our national security and regional interests."

In fact, the relationship has been extremely strained the last few months to the point of breaking. Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton recently traveled to the region to pressure Pakistan to crack down on the Taliban-linked Haqqani network, a major threat to American forces in the region. Adm. Mike Mullen, the former chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, said Pakistan's intelligence agency was a "veritable arm" of the Haqqani.

A low point came in May when U.S. forces found and killed al Qaeda leader Osama bin Laden deep inside Pakistan.

Still, the administration insisted it will continue to provide civilian aid to Pakistan, which has fallen from $1.5 billion in the 2010 fiscal year to $1.1 billion this year. The report said next year's levels are uncertain, but the administration reaffirms its "commitment to providing robust, multi-year civilian assistant to Pakistan."

Unclear is how much Congress will push to reduce funds for Pakistan as lawmakers consider spending bills for the State Department and foreign operations.

The report suggested that a low-cost route toward improving stability in the region would be expanding U.S. market access for both Pakistan and Afghanistan.

The department said it was seeking congressional authorization for creating a U.S.-Pakistan Enterprise Fund, similar to funds created in Eastern Europe and with the former Soviet states in the 1990s.

© 2011 The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
15 Comments Add a Comment
linkicon reporticon emailicon
nighttalk says:
They...our government...will never get it...the muslim world is our enemy...they don't like us...we can't beat them...giving them our money is the most idiotic idea any politician has come up with...we now are letting them dictate policies to us!...we have surely become the joke of the muslim world...there are some of us...Americans who understand the facts...these inbred goat herders are winning...will always win...we the American people will always lose...our government sees to that.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Anotheryahoo says:
Ridiculous, another reason to vote RON PAUL, we have stop the idiocy in Washington thinking they can just keep borrowing from China and give it away to countrys thats hate Freedom and Liberty and then give the bill to the U.S. tax payer.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
FL_Son says:
Don't we all just love it when our great "leaders" go around giving our money away overseas ? Really popular with the American public living in cars isn't it ? The last time Clinton was in Pakistan "she" gave them 600 million dollars. This is all while congress is hurt and offended if any American institution begs for a 5 million dollar handout to do something frivilous like food or housing or text books or student aid. Can't have that !
But $300 million every day to chase a few hundred goat herders around in Afghanvietistan ? SURE ! No limits for that... I mean as long as China agrees to keep lending us 40% of that 300 million a day. This is how Empires fall.. bankrupting themselves. Pride goeth before the fall.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Martha12345 says:
Still trying to buy friends are we ? When will we learn ?
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
riptide213 says:
Stop exporting our tax money. Halt feel good pledging any US government foreign aid to any overseas cause.

Fix America first and foremost.

Need a cause to throw our money at, seek a domestic US problem to fix or better yet save some cash for our rainy days. Why must elected US politicians and their civil servant appointees freely give away other US citizens hard earned tax dollars?

US already pays more than its fair share to UN global programs, stop the extra direct overseas aid tax giveaways.

Not US role to tackle every world crisis.

Stop trying to bribe or buy supposed worldwide allies.

US cannot afford it anymore; try old fashioned diplomacy with more respectful talk and less tax cash funded trinkets.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
DCCorruption says:
What is wrong with our moronic leaders in D.C.? They are gutting programs here left and right and we're sending money to frigging Pakistan?! D.C. is corrupt to beyond belief and completely deaf to the American people. Our government no longer is the government of the people, for the people and by the people because I'd wager that 90% of Americans would say no way to giving Pakistan one cent.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Kurzweil_Jr says:
Hey Obama - You just lost my vote in 2012 !
Paying our troops enemies ( commander-in-chief and President Obama and the White House advisers know and have proof Pakistan supports and facilitates Islamic terrorists to maim and kill American troops and scores of innocent civilians) any amount of money or military aid of any sort makes the US congress, senate and the White House nearly as culpable as Osama bin Laden and Khalid Sheik Mohammad who facilitated, supported in letter and spirit and assisted in carrying out the deaths of nearly 3,000 on 9/11. Our troops are fighting for us abroad trusting that we will support them, not their potential killers. How on earth can the politicians forget that and play politics with the lives of these brave heroes. America - get ready to vote every single one of these traitors out of office for giving Pakistan billions so that they carry on killing our troops against all signed agreements as an ally.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Samlv says:
"US market access" means we export jobs. And since Pakistan had Bin Laden a couple of miles from a place which is their equivalent of West Point, and they let China inspect our gear, and they exported nuclear technology, why are we providing them with one penny? I guess it is cheaper to keep that nuclear power enemy close.

As for Afghanistan, this mincing of words about things 'remaining challenges' is code for the situation is hopeless.

I have noticed that our new 'war' policy is drones only. Makes perfect sense.

The American Error was thinking we can, or should, try to save others from themselves.
reply
FL_Son replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Right on Sam about the code words for hopeless. Our presidents and generals have lied at every turn in our never ending, always vital, "wars" on the other side of the world for many decades.
Too bad Americans can't remember we were always "winning" in Viet Nam right up until the last Marine squad was forced to the roof of the American embassy in Saigon and fled by helicopter.
The first casualty of war is the truth.
linkicon reporticon emailicon
LCCLYDE says:
This is not only an Obama decision,cant be.If it were you know good and well the Repugs would do the usual obstruction and say NO.So why aren't we hearing them throw a fit.its because they are in on it.Washington to be more precise should obviosly say No.Sad thing is America has gotten in a bind there and CAN'T say NO.Its as if we are being victims of extortion,blackmail.Obama does the best he can by using tactics that dont let them know anything,drone attacks,killing terrorist such as bin laden without asking thier permission first,or really giving a damn what they think about it later.But it is a fact to every American that has suffered the hardship of this economy it is NOT right to give them or any other country that dont side with the U.S. money while "We The People" suffer.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
SUZAMBA says:
We send money every where, aid this country and that country, why in the heck can't we for once aid our own country and help our American people!! I'm sick of our state putting the needs of our people on the back burner!! NO MORE. We need to do some serious "HOUSE CLEANING!!" Our government is killing the US, and they are doing a good job of it.
reply
See all 15 Comments