CBS/AP/ February 11, 2009, 4:20 PM

Man Denied Adoption Has Gastric Bypass

A man who weighed 558 pounds when a judge prevented him from adopting a child he and his wife had taken into their home underwent gastric bypass surgery in a bid to win the child back.

Gary Stocklaufer, a 34-year-old truck driver, and his wife claim a judge unfairly discriminated against them because of his weight in deciding to give 4-month-old Max to another couple for possible adoption. The infant from Arlington, Texas, who is related to the Stocklaufers, had lived with them since he was a week old.

This is considered the first case where a couple seeking to adopt has resorted to surgery in the increasingly prevalent practice of denying parents adoptions because they are obese, several adoption experts said.

Officials in Missouri, where the Stocklaufers are from and where the judge's ruling was made, would not confirm the reason Max was removed from the couple's home, citing the confidentiality of ongoing court proceedings in adoption cases.

But Stocklaufer told CBS Station KTVT correspondent Jack Fink that the judge felt, "I wouldn't live long enough to see the child grown, to raise the child."

Stocklaufer dieted before the surgery and weighed 480 pounds when he entered the Renaissance Hospital in Dallas for the operation that could help him shed more than half his bulk.

Renaissance Hosptial and Dr. Wade Barker heard about Stocklaufer's story and wanted to help, so they offered to perform gastric bypass surgery on Stocklaufer free of charge. "Dr. Barker, Renaissance Hospital, are happy to do this," said hospital spokeswoman Angie Flores. "They know the injustice that he has been through," hospital spokeswoman Angie Flores told Fink.

"They have legally kidnapped this child," Cindy Stocklaufer said Friday as her husband recovered from surgery. "There's no guarantee losing the weight will change anything, but we have to try."

"Failure is not an option," Gary Stocklaufer told Fink.

The Jackson County court in Missouri is required "to consider the welfare and best interests of the child" which is a "complicated determination," court spokeswoman Kelley Carpenter said in an e-mail.

An adoptive parent's health is one of the factors considered by investigators at the Missouri Department of Social Services, said the department's communications director, Ana Margarita Compain-Romero. She could not comment on the specifics of the case.

James Waits, a lawyer for the couple taking care of Max, declined to comment. Max is in adoptive placement with the couple, Cindy Stocklaufer said.

The Stocklaufers have been married 15 years and are licensed by the state of Missouri as foster parents and cared for children. In November 2000, they adopted another relative, 8-year-old Robert. The same judge who denied their petition to adopt Max approved Robert's adoption after multiple house visits and background checks, Cindy Stocklaufer said.

Even then, her husband weighed more than 500 pounds. "They never even mentioned it when we adopted Bobby, and he was the same size," she said.

Lee Allen, vice president of the National Council for Adoption, said he believes the court has forgotten the best interest of the child in this case, considering the Stocklaufers are the boy's relatives chosen as parents by the birth mother with a previous successful adoption.

"What I'm really, really impressed with is the fact that this man is willing to go to whatever lengths to adopt Max and raise him," he said.

More and more American agencies have started considering the weight of adoption applicants as they place children, said Gloria Hochman, spokeswoman for the National Adoption Center, though definitions of dangerous obesity vary by state agency.

The regulations are designed to insure permanency for the child, she said.

In May, the Chinese government began considering the body mass index of American parents when screening couples' eligibility for international adoption.
MMVII, CBS Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. The Associated Press contributed to this report
© 2009 CBS Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. The Associated Press contributed to this report.
26 Comments Add a Comment
linkicon reporticon emailicon
gunnerv1 says:
Best of luck to him, I had the same thing done and went from a 58 inch to a 38 inch waist and from 340 pounds to 200 pounds (I''m 6''1") in less than six months. Aside from the pain from the surgery and the gas from eating anything with sugar, it''s the best thing that I ever had done. I really have to try to gain weight now. If I miss one meal, I''ll lose two pounds.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
michellem99-2009 says:
I can''t give money or write a letter as I am legaglly blind..I am against this nanny govt breaking up child and bonded father/mother. It won''t bond with another the child most likely won''t. I never did. In America only fat persons...Nope...The car is the blame for the laziness as well.. I was a pissed child as the bloody state stole me from my poor loving home to have shoved me in a failed foster home system that never met my needs and lied to my father. Same with a school system.. Give the child to them and stop playing god with living things.
I am 52. I spent my whole school years in foster homes abused ones. I used to cry to sleep in them. My room mate can still hear me crying in my sleep and once asked me about it. I was unawared I cried in my sleep. I feel for the children. Best to them and I wish them the beat in this fight. BLOOD IS THICKER THAN WATER.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
michellem99-2009 says:
I can''t give money or write a letter as I am legaglly blind..I am against this nanny govt breaking up child and bonded father/mother. It won''t bond with another the child most likely won''t. I never did. In America only fat persons...Nope...The car is the blame for the laziness as well.. I was a pissed child as the bloody state stole me from my poor loving home to have shoved me in a failed foster home system that never met my needs and lied to my father. Same with a school system.. Give the child to them and stop playing god with living things.
I am 52. I spent my whole school years in foster homes abused ones. I used to cry to sleep in them. My room mate can still hear me crying in my sleep and once asked me about it. I was unawared I cried in my sleep. I feel for the children. Best to them and I wish them the beat in this fight. BLOOD IS THICKER THAN WATER.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
momame43 says:
PLEASE support this family! Follow this link to find all the info to file a letter of complaint with this court, as well as the address for the fund set up to help them with legal fees.

http://open.adoptionblogs.com/index.php/weblogs/a-blue-ribbon-for-baby-max

Gary is to have had his surgery at this time, all prayers are appreciated by this family!
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
keithle1 says:
"The same judge who denied their petition to adopt Max approved Robert''s adoption after multiple house visits and background checks, Cindy Stocklaufer said."

So what''s the problem now, Judge? Not like he
was 180 pounds when you approved Robert''s adoption. It''s not like the man is refusing to
do anything about his obesity. Not like he''s sitting on the coach shovelling Twinkies & donuts in his mouth saying, "Screw you, Judge."

It''s all about whether you love the kids & will put them first in your life.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
colonieny says:
The health risks for this man is tremendoous, including being bed ridden, and having diabetes so that he has difficulty walking from arterial disease, and blindness. With that as a probable future, he is a prime candidate for this surgery. I do not believe it is his "fault" but I applaud his decision to have the surgery. Since they, he seem like loving parents, I do not see why the judge "rushed" into this decision against them.
Does the judge have any personal relationship with the "winning" couple ?

This seems like another example of judges making things up as they go along. I for one fear such a system- both arbritory and costly. Look at these two celbrities, getting no jail time. what would have happen to you or me or our kids. Besides harsh penaly, Felony, and probably kicked out of school and jobs for life. Look at OJ. Look at some poor guys freed after years on death row.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
keithle1 says:
Only in America do we have people that weigh 558 pounds.

He must really love the child if he went through the gastric bypass surgery. Leave ''em alone.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
kevinmbdeowo says:
As an adult adoptee (58) I feel I can offer some first hand observations.
1. They HAVE BEEN THE PARENTS for four months.
2. Strong bonds and feelings are already in place, with ALL family members.
3. THEY ARE Family and there is the precedence of having allowed them to adopt the other boy by the SAME JUDGE.
4. Why is the other family already in the process of adopting this child when there are appeals in the works?
5. GIVE HIM BACK.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
michellem99-2009 says:
The judges..children are to be with the ones they boned with. No bloody court should break that bond. The only parent I boned with was Dad. Back then the mother got the kids. Or she would not raise them, the state grabbed them/us. Family comes first and they raise their own..Not some legal system--nanny govt. Mum/Dad...They won''t grow up to raise the kid as long as the nanny state will raise the child,they go on their merry way just to breed more.Never ending on ans on..The child is a living thing..not an item to toss here/there.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
galaxiana says:
This case is frightening, because the fact of being FAMILY to the child has always been the overwhelming first consideration in who should get to adopt, with the birth mother''s wishes being a strong second. I can understand disallowing adoption if the family member has drug or alcohol problems, is a felon, or other things that have happened in the PAST that make them unsuitable. But to say that someone MIGHT, in the FUTURE, MAYBE not be fit is ridiculous.

As others have said, it''s hard enough to find people willing to adopt babies more than a week old, why make it even harder for them based on MAYBE MIGHT BE''s? I know of many very obese people who lived long, full lives. Some people are just built BIG. This man looks like one of them. Is the pendulum of our prickly, politically-correct, don''t-blame-people-for-being-born-what-they-were society finally swinging the other direction?
reply
See all 26 Comments