Eyewitness: How Accurate Is Visual Memory?

Seven more years went by, and then everyone in Central Prison was riveted by a big news story: the trial of O.J. Simpson.

"I would get my radio and put my earplugs in, and go outside, and sit in a corner," Cotton said.

There, he'd listen to the trial.

He was intrigued by something he'd never heard of: DNA. He wrote to his new attorney, law professor Rich Rosen.

Rosen warned him that there probably wasn't any evidence left to test, and if there was, DNA could cut both ways.

"Understand if the DNA comes back and shows that you did this crime, whatever legal issues we have don't make any bit of difference. You're gonna spend the rest of your life in prison," Rosen said.

"He warned you that if it comes up positive, you're sunk?" Stahl asked Cotton.

"I told him to put his foot down and go with it," he replied.

Packed away on the shelves of the Burlington Police Department was 10-year-old evidence from the two rapes that night. Inside one of the rape kits was a fragment of a single sperm with viable DNA. It proved what Ronald Cotton had been saying all along - that he was innocent, and that the rapist was Bobby Poole.

Within days, Cotton was back in court, this time, to be released.

"So not only do you find out that Ron didn't do the crime, you find out Bobby Poole did," Stahl remarked.

"It was just utter shock, really. Disbelief," Detective Mike Gauldin recalled. "I mean, by this time, this is 11 years later. And, you know, I know that I've been involved in a case where a man has lost 11 years of his life. And I was so sad for him and his family."

In the years since Cotton's conviction, Jennifer Thompson had married and had children.

Gauldin broke the news to her. "Her reaction: 'No, that can't be true. It's not possible.' You know? 'I know Ronald Cotton raped me. There's no question in my mind.'"

"It was like someone had just taken my life and, like, turned it upside down," she told Stahl.

Gauldin said Thompson cried and broke down. "I mean, she took it all on herself, you know, the guilt, you know, 'I did this to that man.'"

Thompson told Stahl she felt terrible shame. "Suffocating, debilitating shame."

But when she thought or dreamed about that night, it was still Cotton's face she saw. To get past it, she asked if he would meet with her at a local church. "I remember him walkin' into the church. And I physically could not stand up," Thompson recalled.

"She was nervous. Scared," Cotton said.

"I started to cry immediately. And I looked at him, and I said, 'Ron, if I spent every second of every minute of every hour for the rest of my life telling you how sorry I am, it wouldn't come close to how my heart feels. I'm so sorry.' And Ronald just leaned down, he took my hands…and he looked at me, he said, 'I forgive you,'" Thompson remembered.

"I told her, I said, 'Jennifer, I forgive you. I don't want you to look over your shoulder. I just want us to be happy and move on in life,'" Cotton recalled.

"The minute he forgave me, it's like my heart physically started to heal. And I thought, 'This is what grace and mercy is all about. This is what they teach you in church that none of us ever get.' And here was this man that I had hated. I mean, I used to pray every day of my life during those eleven years that he would die. That he would be raped in prison and someone would kill him in prison. That was my prayer to God. And here was this man who with grace and mercy just forgave me," Thompson told Stahl. "How wrong I was, and how good he is."

How is it that Thompson could have studied her rapist so carefully and still made this mistake? And how could she have failed to recognize Bobby Poole, the actual rapist, when he sat right in front of her in the courtroom three years later?

• « Previous Page
• 1
• 2
• 3
• 4
• 5
• 6
• Next Page »

[demandjusticefortonyford]

Tony Egbuna Ford was sentenced to death in 1993 based solely on faulty eyewitness identification. He has endured receiving two execution dates only to have them stayed, but could receive another one at any time. The issues with the ID in his case are many and include:
* Viewing a 6 person photo spread with Tony at position 5, the witness first picked out number 4 as the perpetrator. This was written over with the number 5 later (by the detective in the case). We have copies of both the original and the amended statements. This has never been explained and was never challenged by Tony's trial counsel.
* One of the two witnesses identified Tony AFTER his picture had been all over the news as the prime suspect, and after having time to speak to the first witness (her sister) and discuss the photo spread (both sisters were shown the same photo spread)
* One of the two "eye witnesses" stated she had her head buried in a pillow the whole time of the incident
* On the day of trial both witnesses were asked (improperly) to confirm their identification of Tony outside of the courtroom. The prosecution pointed to Tony and asked "does that look like the man?". The witnesses took a long time to look at him and answered only that they weren't sure but it "could" be. This was witnessed by the court reporter who came forward in 2006 and spoke to journalists then researching the case for the show "The Wrong Man". The court reporter stated it was the only case that had ever caused him to be upset since he knew as soon as he witnessed it that Tony's trial would not be fair.
* This was a cross racial ID - under high stress.
* None of the other men in the line ups the witnesses were shown looked even vaguely like Tony or the true perpetrator.
* Eyewitness evidence was the ONLY evidence against Tony.

Further information on Tony's case is available on www.tonyegbunaford.com - including a study done by an eyewitness expert (whose assistance was denied at trial) which shows that the photospread was heavily weighted towards Tony being picked out.

What kind of a justice system consistently affirms a conviction based on eyewitness testimony that is so clearly open to serious question. Death is final and we do not want Tony to be the case that proves innocent men are executed in the state of Texas.

[Slrman-21001573651763300012869]

Every police officer and prosecutor knows that eyewitness testimony is horribly unreliable. But they need "good busts" and convictions to advance their careers. So truth and justice take a distant second place to that.

I have never known a police officer who didn't lie, falsify evidence, and ignore facts. Nor have a ever heard of a prosecutor who didn't do as much or worse. The "justice" system in the USA is broken. If there were justice, many cops and prosecutors would be in prison.

[Norbit2010]

Many states provide immunity to prosecutors even when the prosecutors knowingly prosecute innocent people:
http://www.dickgammick.blogspot.com

[Mrkizzmo]

Leslie, what you failed to inform us is WHAT PERCENTAGE OF THE 230 MEN FREED IN THE LAST FEW YEARS BY DNA WERE BLACK OR MINORITY MEN! My guess is 80 to 90%. The most recent PUBLICIZED case, Bonnie Sweeten, from Philadelphia, who claimed that she and her daughter Julia had been abducted by black men; she was later found at Disneyland! What she failed to realize was the 'maelstrom' and 'frenzy' she caused when she falsely reported that they had been kidnapped by 'black men'; the police went into overdrive and the FBI got involved nationwide, because: 'A WHITE woman and girl had been taken by BLACKS!!! BLACKS!!!' I doubt it would have even been a 'statewide' story, (let alone a national one!) had it not been BLACKS falsely accused of the crime...

Thank GOD for DNA, and SHAME on the 'George Bush Sr and Jr Supreme Court' for not mandating the testing of DNA (when available) for EVERY American, instead of leaving it to the 'hodgepodge' of rules imposed by the 50 states. Virginia, for example, will not allow subsequent DNA testing of 'convicted' Americans if it was not requested during the original trial, regardless of whether it would free the wrongfully imprisoned and innocent person or not. WHY? Why can a citizen spend the rest of their life in jail due to an 'incompetent' attorney, even though the evidence to prove their innocence still lies in the State Police vault? Why is it up to the DA in so many other States to 'ALLOW' DNA to be tested, instead of it being a RIGHT? Only in the USA! How many Black men in this country have been spent their lives in prison or been executed before the advent - in 1978 - of DNA? Google "BLAME THE BLACK MAN" and read the sordid and sadistic 'tradition' of victimization perpetrated by our society, and we wonder why many beleive that 'RACISM IS NOT YET DEAD!' Again, Leslie, What percentage of the 230 exonerated by DNA to date were BLACK? PLEASE ANSWER...

[caleb02]

I just saw this story and it brought tears to my eyes because I am going through this now. The father of my child is sitting in a prison cell in Nevada for being accused of rape. He happens to be Muslim and was at the wrong place at the wrong time. He was visiting Las Vegas, which I will never go back to. I wonder if I was there if it would have made a difference since I am caucasian. It took a jury 13 minutes to come up with a guilty verdict and the judge, who should not be a judge gave him life without parole. The evidence does not add up and the victim could NOT point him out in a line up. In fact she did not even say it was him until she was asked if he was in the courtroom. There is no justice when a person has no money, no support system because his family can't afford to fly out there when there was a court date because it changed all the time. I tried to get answers and help and all I got was 'you will have to wait till the sentencing' Well look where that got me. My son will grow up not having his father around.

[bilam]

I forgot to add that the detectives and the DAs involved in this case should be commended for their willingness to see that justice was done and willingness to correct the mistake when it was discovered. There are instances where, perhaps out of pride or conceit , some DAs are reluctant to review or subject the evidence in the case to DNA testing. In hindsight, it appears the mistake was triggered by the absence of the real perpetrator (Bobby Poole) in the intial photo line-up from which he Ronald was misidentified.

[bilam]

In this interview the lady Jennifer Thompson (rape Victim/survivor) did better than the one she did on PBS in 1997. I was somehow pissed off by some of what she said then. Then she sounded resentful that the guy had been out and people were celebrating his release and that he had been interviewed by Larry King! She claimed that unlike him, she was getting no resistitution. That for him he had been merely behind physical bars for 11 years but for her she was behind emotional bars for life (She forgot/ignored the fact that experience of the trial and imprisonment was also to stay with Mr. Cotton for life )

DNA exonerated Mr. Cotton and implicated Bobby Poole. Farthermore, Bobby Poole, when confronted with DNA evidence, confessed to both (Thompson's and Elizabeth's rapes). That is the person she should have adressed her need for resistitution and everything else to -not Mr. Cotton. If she had any lingering doubts, she could and should have asked Mr. Poole some details about the rape and the whole incident that only the actual person who raped her could have known. This should not have been difficult for her since she had claimed that she was more intelligent than her rapist and had used her intelligence over him to escape.

[Tonjabrown]

To Prove His Innocence pg. 143 "No one would charge O?NEILL with perjury, therefore, the Court would not grant Nolan?s Writ nor even look at the evidence to see if it proved perjury.Anything that he had brought up before and that Judge McGee had dismissed couldn?t be brought up again, even if Judge McGee was wrong. The only way to get a review of Judge McGee?s decision was to go to the Supreme Court of Nevada to appeal McGee or to finally file in federal court. All of these steps had to be followed in order and lawfully correct. Nolan was learning. Tonja?s response to the dismissal of the Writ and the refusal to act by the DA?s office was to direct attention to this by the only means she knew would work.Tonja again contacted the media. She called the Sparks Tribune and Nevada Appeal. On June 21, 1993, she was in front of the Public Service Commission to protest the employment of O?Neill in a State job. Her protest sign proclaimed the battle cry given to her by the Assistant DA : ?What?s the difference between a lie and an exaggerated truth.? On the flip side ?Ask Shelly O?Neill.? The media did show up, now savvy to Tonja?s ongoing protest of the justice system. Angela Curtis for Sparks Tribune interviewed O?Neill. Troy Anderson with the Nevada Appeal asked O?Neill for a statement also. O?Neill told Anderson that she couldn?t talk at that time, but she did come out to speak, or rather to plead with, Tonja and they spent one-half hour talking. O?Neill told Tonja that her job was in jeopardy.Tonja couldn?t believe that O?Neill thought that Tonja could be swayed by such an appeal. Tonja dismissed such a notion immediately, ?I don?t care.?Then O?Neill tried to threaten her and told Tonja that she had called Ann Langer ( Nolan?s former juror and now assistant DA in Carson City) and she intended to have Tonja arrested for stalking. Tonja reminded her that the Public Service Commission was a public place and that Tonja, a citizen of these United States, was exercising her first amendment rights. Shelly had to admit that she was correct, and further admitted that Tonja was one smart girl. Then the negotiation began. O?Neill wanted to know what it would take for Tonja to go away. At that moment, Tonja really intended to get the truth and go away and so she merely said that what she wanted was the truth. Incredibly, O?Neill said, ?O.K. what do you want to know.? Tonja cut straight to it. She wanted to know about the prime suspect Rickie Lee Zarsky. Ford, the investigator check him out before trial. This, Tonja knew, she had not done and she called O?Neill on it. Tonja revealed the conversation with Ford. Ford had immediately told Tonja that he remembered her and he remembered the case but he had no idea about another suspect. Tonja told him that O?Neill had testified that she had sent Ford to investigate and check out the leads on Zarsky. He said that it was not only not in the file but he had no personal recollection of it either. ?Well, you caught me.? O?Neill commented on Tonja?s narrative of the Ford lack of recollection. ?But, would it have made a difference?? This was the constant refrain adopted by O?Neill. ?Would it have made a difference?? was all she would reply to one after the other fact that Tonja threw at her. ?Damn right, if the jury had known there was another suspect when it was a case of mistaken identity.? Tonja slammed back at her. Tonja went on to remind O?Neill that the contrast of the composite sketch of the suspect in the April 21st incident had it been compared to the composite sketch of the suspect identified by the Payless victims would have certainly caused the jury to wonder if there had been someone else. Didn?t O?Neill believe that the unidentified detective might have made a huge difference if called to testify why he wrote that the Payless crime was ?very similar? to a crime that occurred on April 21st at Oddie and El Rancho. That Payless victim had been given an opportunity to view and identify Nolan while he was at Sparks P.D., but she could not. Certainly, that, with the other evidence would have cast doubt on Nolan?s guilt. How could O?Neill say that similarity of these two crimes might not have created a huge doubt in the jurors? minds. O?Neill simply failed to respond.

[Tonjabrown]

What Tonja could not believe was O?Neill?s reaction to the explanation of the beard evidence. Tonja told O?Neill that she had read O?Neill?s testimony from the hearing. Tonja had constantly complained that O?Neill neglected to put on the evidence that Nolan had a full beard at the time of the crime. The victims had described their assailant as having a stubble. However, much of this evidence had been muddled. Tonja described to O?Neill that the booking picture of Nolan taken September 15, 1988 showed Nolan with a stubble as the victims described. O?Neill had relied upon that picture for her understanding of the status of Nolan?s beard. What she had missed was that Nolan had a full beard, which showed up in the photo line up at the time he was detained for questioning in May, four months earlier. At the time of his arrest, he only had a two to three day stubble just as the victims had described, but Nolan was arrested in September. O?Neill?s chin dropped upon the realization that she had missed Tonja?s entire point during trial because she had looked at the wrong photo.
Tonja demanded to know why O?Neill had failed to follow up on the witness information that Tonja?s mom had found. Don Lutzenberg had been watching the car the night of the Payless incident and written down the license plate number.Tonja?s Mom had actually located Mr. Lutszenberg. O?Neill hadn?t even checked it out, but all she asked again was ?Would it have made a difference? Yes, he had a different license plate number, not Nolan?s. If Tonja had discovered all of this evidence why had O?Neill, an attorney with an investigator, not found some of this exculpatory information?Had the DA really cooperated as O?Neill had testified? Tonja knew the answer was no or why would O?Neill have made a motion before trial to force the DA to reveal the evidence because they had refused to turn it over. Tonja was sickened by the admissions of O?Neill. How could she ever absorb the import of O?Neill?s plain callousness for her brother?s case and the result. ?Would it have made a difference? rang in Tonja?s ears for the better part of two weeks. Tonja needed to scream about the injustice in some way or burst with the knowledge inside her. She sent a letter to the Assistant DA detailing the statements made by O?Neill. The letter joined the rest of the file on his desk and laid there until the statute of limitations ran in 1994. The documentation that Tonja had amassed convinced the City Council but didn?t phase the Assistant District Attorney." CORRUPTION IS EVERYWHERE. DO YOU REALLY THINK THAT JUDGE MILLS LANE WOULD HAVE HAD HIS TV SHOW, "THE JUDGE MILLS LANE SHOW" IF THIS INFORMATION WOULD HAVE BEEN OUT ABOUT WHAT HE DID BACK THEN? JUDGE MCGEE IS A SENIOR SITTING JUDGE IN THE STATE OF NEVADA. SHOULD HE BE? ABSOLUTELY NOT. IN MARCH 2007 DURING A WASHOE COUNTY PUBLIC HEARING WHEN NOLAN'S PUBLIC DEFENDER, SHELLY O'NELL WAS BEING CONSIDERED FOR THE POSTITION OF THE HEAD OF THE WASHOE COUNTY PUBLIC DEFENDERS CONFLITC UNIT EVIDENCE WAS ADMITTED BY ME AGAINST HER. SHELLY DOES NOT DENY THAT SHE ADMITTED COMMITTING PERJURY DURING NOLAN'S 1991 POSTCONVICTION HEARING WHEN SHE TESTIFIED THAT SHE DID AN INVESTIGATION INTO THE PRIME SUSPECT AND THE REST OF THE EVIDENCE THAT CLEARED HIM OF THE CRIME. WHEN THE MEMBERS OF THE COMMITTEE ASKED HER ABOUT THIS SHE SAID SHE HAD NOTHING TO SAY. SHE WAS NOT APPOINTED TO THE POSTITION, HOWEVER, SHELLY O'NEILL CONTINUES TO PRACTICE LAW AND POSSBILY DESTROY OTHER PEOPLE'S LIVES. JUDGE MILLS LANE'S NAME STILL APPEARS ON THE NEW WASHOE COUNTY COURTHOUSE BUILDING IN RENO, NV. JUDGE MCGEE STILL HAS HIS NAME ON THE CHARLES MCGEE JUVENILLE DETENTION CENTER. THESE PEOPLE SHOULD ALL BE IN PRISON BUT THERE NOT. HERE'S YOUR NEXT STORY 60 MINUTES.

[Tonjabrown]

CHAPTER TWELVE THE DNA
On January 19, 1996, Tonja was still waiting to receive a post card from Reno P.D. with a new ID number for her new police report. She had filed the report after Niles Carson failed to call her back. As she waited, the days turned into weeks. She called the Reno P.D. and inquired about her new ID number since the procedure had not changed since the 1995 police report she had filed. She was told that there was no record of filing a new report. She had sent it certified and the receipt was returned and had been signed for by an officer. She was told that all the Reno P.D. had was a closed 1995 case. She called Det. Carson to find out if he knew what had happened to her 1996 case and left a message on his answering machine. Tonja told Det. Carson?s machine that she had not heard from him regarding her 1995 report so she decided to go ahead and file another police report and, although it was signed as received by the Reno P.D., no one had a record of it. She sweetly asked him to please give her a call, wishing she could call him the conniving son of a ***** that she thought he was. This time Carson did call her back and said that he knew where the report was, it was sitting on his desk. He checked into it and contacted Mills Lane and now he was waiting for Lane to become the head of the Court. He explained to her that he had told the entire story to Mills Lane and Lane had instructed him to hold on to the report until Lane became Chief Judge. This is what we decided to do was all that he would say to her. He added that this ?crime? and she could tell by the way he used the word crime with a sneer that he didn?t think this was much more than a waste of his time, was going to be listed as a petty theft. He had not called it a petty theft in the report but, after his conversation with Mills Lane, had determined it was a petty theft because the filters weren?t valuable. Tonja knew that the filters were of grave importance to the case if the Innocence Project became Nolan?s attorney. Tonja next called the office of Judge Mills Lane to determine if he would include her in the information circuit about the investigation. Lane said he could not respond until he received the letter from Det. Carson. Tonja begged Lane to have an outside investigation conducted by the Nevada Department of Investigation. He assumed his famous cocky attitude and explained to her, little lady, that he would not turn this over to an outside investigation. He stated that when he got that letter, he would walk it down to the Court, Judge Charles McGee. Tonja was appalled. My god, he wouldn?t do that, she thought. One of the persons who checked out the evidence was Judge McGee.He could be a suspect. Lane assured her that was exactly what he intended to do. Lane told her to call McGee and set up an appointment. After she got off the phone, she called McGee?s secretary and told her that Judge Lane was going to bring a letter to his office from Det. Carson. Tonja explained that Judge Lane had instructed her to set up an appointment with McGee. After considerable stewing over the entire situation, Tonja believed that she had to follow through with what Lane directed her to do. In a week she called McGee?s office to find out if he had received the letter. Indeed, he had received it and left a specific message for her and that was that he would meet with her only if District Attorney Gammick would also meet. Her next duty was to call Gammick. After her past experience with the D.A.?s office, she didn?t hold out much hope for a warm welcome there.As she expected, Gammick stated that he would not meet with her now or ever and for her to get an attorney. When she related this to the Judge, he stated that he wouldn?t have an ex parte 13 communication without Gammick there. Nolan, on the other hand, wasn?t even mentioned by the Judge as a necessary party for this meeting. Any more work on this investigation was futile, Tonja could see that.
13 Ex parte is the term for a communication between the Judge and one party without all the parties to the matter present. In a contested matter, this is generally a forbidden communication. 12 and half years later we would finally learn the truth about what happened to Nolan's DNA evidence that he wanted tested.
Gammick finally told the truth, something that we already knew and could not prove. They had illegally tested the filters and hid the results from us. Why? because they learned that Nolan was truly innocent of the crime and they could not tell anyone because their actions were totally illegal. This is a story that should be told about what we have been going through for nearly 21 years.

[Tonjabrown]

Pt. 4 3 The Defendant makes this Motion to Compel the test results of the DNA evidence in his criminal file in order to determine if the District Attorney has results of testing done after trial as he stated on September 22, 2008. The Defendant has made a written request for the results of this testing and the District Attorney has denied his request.4 The Defendant has a right to have the results of the testing of his missing DNA evidence from a criminal trial where he was found guilty where no DNA evidence was admitted and because of which he has languished in prison since 1988.
WHEREFORE THE ABOVE-STATED REASONS, the Defendant moves this Court to compel the District Attorney of Washoe County to provide the results of the testing of ///the DNA samples from the criminal file of the Defendant which test results were derived after trial, to the Defendant and his counsel, Robert R. Hager,, immediately. Ralph Heller, a columnist for the Sparks Daily Tribune. Ralph wrote this item for the Tribune:
TAMPERING: Nolan Klein has been in state prison since he was found guilty of robbery and assault in early 1989, but irregularities and unorthodox procedure associated with the prosecution of his case have troubled many people to this day. Now both the renowned Benjamin N. Cardozo School of Law in New York City and a national ACLU official are interested in taking a closer look at things. It appears that certain evidence, stored in an envelope box from which the evidence could be taken for future DNA testing, has been tampered with. Especially intriguing are two filtertip cigarette butts from which the saliva on the filters might later be tested to determine blood type (DNA). But it seems that the filters have been mysteriously removed from the cigarette butts, with no explanation, making such DNA testing impossible. Indeed, I?m told that a report will be forthcoming shortly from detective Jenkins of the Reno Police Department in which mention will be made of the fact that evidence in this case has been tampered with. Meanwhile, Klein?s sister, Tonja Brown of Carson City, has tried her best to interest DA Richard Gammick in this travesty, but without success.