AP/ July 31, 2009, 6:44 AM

Stimulus Cash Not Fixing Dangerous Bridges

Tens of thousands of unsafe or decaying bridges carrying 100 million drivers a day must wait for repairs because states are spending stimulus money on spans that are already in good shape or on easier projects like repaving roads, an Associated Press analysis shows.

President Obama urged Congress last winter to pass his $787 billion stimulus package so some of the economic recovery money could be used to rebuild what he called America's "crumbling bridges." Lawmakers said it was a historic chance to chip away at the $65 billion backlog of deficient structures, often neglected until a catastrophe like the Minneapolis bridge that collapsed two years ago this Saturday.

States, however, have other plans. Of the 2,476 bridges scheduled to receive stimulus money so far, nearly half have passed inspections with high marks, according to federal data. Those 1,123 sound bridges received such high inspection ratings that they normally would not qualify for federal bridge money, yet they will share in more than $1.2 billion in stimulus money.

The wooden bridge built in 1900 carrying Harlan Springs Road in Berkeley County, W.Va., is one of the nation's unsafe structures not being repaired. About 2,700 cars cross it every day. But with holes in the wooden deck and corroded railings and missing steel poles, only one car at a time can travel the 300-foot rickety span.

The bridge is an example of how Mr. Obama's call to spend recovery money quickly - on "shovel ready" projects to get people back to work - has clashed with other goals of the stimulus, such as targeting high-unemployment areas and rebuilding the nation's infrastructure. State transportation officials say the need for speed makes it hard to funnel money into needy counties or to take on extensive bridge repairs that can involve years of planning and construction.

Repaving or widening roads requires less planning and can be done quickly, which is why such projects account for 70 percent of the $17 billion in transportation stimulus money approved so far. Bridge projects represent 12 percent.

The spending decisions by states are OK with the Obama administration.

Ed Deseve, the president's chief executive of the stimulus, said the administration understands the desire to tackle "longer-term, gleam-in-the-eye projects" but told states "please, give us your shovel-ready projects."

The idea, he said, was to provide an immediate jolt to the nation's economy.

"We're delighted states are able to move quickly," Deseve said.

A few states, such as Virginia and South Carolina, are targeting their troubled bridges. In all, 1,286 deficient or obsolete bridges are expected to share $2.2 billion in stimulus money for repairs, the AP analysis shows.

But that's less than 1 percent of the more than 150,000 bridges nationwide that engineers have labeled deficient or obsolete. Of those, more than 39,000 are considered the worst, rated poor in at least one structural component and eligible to be replaced with federal money.

William Stubblefield, a Berkeley County, W.Va., commissioner, said he's confident state transportation officials are monitoring bridge safety and money will come soon for his county's bridges. The wooden bridge in Berkeley County is among more than a third of the state's 7,064 bridges deemed deficient or obsolete by inspectors.

Safety problems are so obvious on some spans, like the Harlan Springs bridge, that engineers have restricted traffic.

"If we're seeing some obvious deterioration, that's too late," Stubblefield said.

For its analysis, the AP asked each state and the District of Columbia to identify every bridge on which it planned some work using stimulus money. In some states that represented a final list. In others, new projects could be added. Most states provided project costs, but some did not. Some states included in their costs other road work related to the bridge project, like paving or widening nearby roads.

The AP then researched each bridge using the latest inspection data available from the Transportation Department.

This analysis found that:

• Many states did not make bridge work a priority in stimulus spending. More than half plan work on fewer than two dozen bridges and 18 states plan fewer than 10 projects.

• In 24 states, at least half of the bridges being worked on with stimulus money were not deficient.

• In 15 states, at least two-thirds of the bridges receiving stimulus money are not deficient.

Transportation officials said the stimulus program's mandates - shovel-ready projects that can be finished in three years and create jobs quickly - made it nearly impossible to focus on bad bridges that weren't already scheduled for repairs.

"The feds had their own priorities, and their big priority was jobs and the economy. As a result, we had to move things quickly. I don't fault that," said John Zicconi, spokesman for the Vermont Agency of Transportation. "Nobody put the stimulus together as an answer to all our bridge issues. It was about putting people to work."

That's not exactly how it was billed. Mr. Obama pointed to the construction of the Golden Gate Bridge during the Great Depression as an example of how transportation money in the new stimulus law could "remake the face of the nation."

"It's what we're doing once more, by building a 21st century infrastructure that will make America's economy stronger and America's people safer," Mr. Obama said in March.

While the stimulus will pay for a few such projects, like the massive new Cleveland Innerbelt Bridge, for the most part the money will not build a 21st century transportation system. It will repave the 20th century system.

Democrats helping Mr. Obama campaign for the stimulus program singled out bridge repairs when promoting the bill. In a conference call with reporters before passage, Rhode Island Sen. Jack Reed said a bridge in Providence would benefit from the recovery program.

"If we fix that bridge, we're not only putting people to work, but we're going to speed, literally speed our economic activity," Reed said.

The Pawtucket River Bridge may have helped Reed make his point, but it was already on track to be repaired and is not part of the state's stimulus plan. Rhode Island, the state with the nation's highest percentage, 52 percent, of bad bridges, so far plans to use stimulus money to work on only six of its 397 deficient or obsolete structures.

After the stimulus bill was passed in February, Massachusetts Gov. Deval Patrick was asked on National Public Radio to list projects the stimulus would fund.

"I can tell you that, for example, we have some prominent bridges that are structurally deficient that we want to get to as soon as possible for reasons of safety," Patrick said.

But Patrick knew that months earlier he and state legislators had passed a $3 billion bridge program that didn't rely on stimulus money. Massachusetts, a state with more than half of its 5,063 bridges deemed deficient or obsolete by inspectors, so far is spending recovery money on only one bridge.

Some states did decide early to target bad bridges with economic recovery money.

In Virginia, state bridge engineer Kendal Walus recalled bosses telling him last fall, as talk of a stimulus was just beginning, that the state would probably make bridges a priority.

"They said, get as many bridge projects as I could get and they'd be willing to entertain it," Walus said.

With more than 1,200 deficient bridges in the state and an estimated $3.7 billion needed to repair or replace them, there were lots of choices. Engineers selected small bridges that could be fixed without the long engineering process and environmental permitting normally required for larger structures. Walus said engineers worked long hours this winter tying up loose ends to get those projects ready to go.

As a result, 69 of the 73 Virginia bridges receiving stimulus money are either deficient or obsolete, according to inspection records.

But targeting deficient bridges with new federal money isn't as easy as it sounds, officials in other states said.

Washington state, for example, struggled with a plea from King County officials to help pay for the replacement of the 75-year-old drawbridge that serves as a major corridor in Seattle and connects two of the city's industrial areas. The bridge's cracked concrete foundations, widespread corrosion in steel beams and deteriorating moveable spans make it one of the nation's worst still in daily operation - scoring a 3 out of 100 for structural sufficiency.

State officials couldn't commit stimulus money to the project, which already was getting local and state funds, said Paula Hammond, the state's transportation secretary. The South Park bridge was not a state priority, and officials needed to focus on projects that could be completed quickly, Hammond said.

"Every state is going through this because speed was a major, major factor for us," she said.

More than a quarter of Washington's 7,763 bridges are either deficient or obsolete, inspection records show.

With $27 billion in highway and bridge money, the stimulus provided an important stopgap but is too little to remake the U.S. transportation infrastructure, she added.

"If you wanted that to happen," Hammond said, "you'd probably have to multiply that number by 10."
© 2009 The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
28 Comments Add a Comment
linkicon reporticon emailicon
ladypirate2 says:
I recently heard of two more things in my area that the stimulus money has paid for. The school district in my area was able to replace it's entire fleet of 15 school buses with brand new 2009 buses. Also three country bridges in the southern part of my county are finally being replaced after about 100 years. These bridges are counted as one project because they are all in one place. They are one right after another on the same road. For years only one car at a time has been able cross these bridges. When two cars meet on this road one car has to pull off the road and stop and allow the other car to cross the bridges before they can proceed. Heavy trucks haven't been allowed to cross these bridges in years but school buses cross them every day. For years I have had horrible thoughts of a school bus loaded with children someday plunging into the river below. These bridges shake, creak and moan everytime a school bus or even a car crosses them. I am VERY glad that they are being replaced!
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
ladypirate2 says:
Probably if the truth be known much of the money is going to line some rich people's pockets. There should have been stricter earmarks put on this stimulus money from the beginning but there wasn't. It was the same with the bailouts. As I recall some of the banks used their bailout money to fund luxury retreats for their ceos and then they had the nerve to ask congress for more money and they got it!

However I do know of one major bridge that is being replaced by using the stimulus money. That is the bridge over the Arkansas river on the interstate 244 bipass around Tulsa, OK. Very little has been done to this bridge in the last 50 years and it is in terrible shape. The concrete is crumbing and even the re-bars and structure of the bridge is showing in places. It is a major traffic artery around north Tulsa and to downtown. Thousands of people cross this bridge everyday, especially during rush hours.

I was very delighted to hear that it is going to be replaced because for a long time I have had horrible thoughts about it suddenly falling into the river during rush hour, killing whomever might be crossing it at the time. I was also very glad to hear that the entire 244 bipass around Tulsa is going to be replaced from the western bank of the river, including the bridge, eastward about six miles around downtown. Even though it's going to take nearly two years for the entire project and it's going to be a major inconvenience and a traffic headache, it is much needed!
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
gramto8 says:
I would be ashamed to be as hard-hearted and as hard-headed as some of you are. I guess you think that only 'liberals' have lost jobs thanks to Bush tanking the economy. Guess again. There are a lot of republicans that are losing their homes just like we democrats are losing ours. There are republicans that have no medical insurance, no job, no income, and no hope of any of the above except through this stimulus bill. Get a grip and get over yourselves. Maybe you were fortunate enough to afford college and have been fortunate enough not to be 'downsized' out of a job. A lot of Americans can't say that.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
denn034 says:
Wasn't the stimulus money sent to the states to do just that? If not, then, incompetence seems the order of the day.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
grabandgo says:
The stimulus is a big horse and pony show put on by our jr senator nobama and tax cheat timmy.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Joe_NY_15 says:
by rightaboutit July 31, 2009 10:52 AM EDT
by the_majesty July 31, 2009 8:13 AM EDT
The stimulus has only raised the deficit, it has not fixed anything

Wow! You need to open your eyes. All kinds of stimulus projects going on around me. You need to rid your mind of the economics of poop. The voting public obviously has. republicans are being thrown out of office as fast as the election process will allow.
__________________________________

Can you give us some specifics about ANY of these projects "going on around you" ?? Curious, because only 6% of the Stimulus has been spent, so I'm interested in details of all these projects...

I'll wait for your response.....just name one project...one...'Thats going on all around you"
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Joe_NY_15 says:
by rightaboutit July 31, 2009 10:52 AM EDT
by the_majesty July 31, 2009 8:13 AM EDT
The stimulus has only raised the deficit, it has not fixed anything

Wow! You need to open your eyes. All kinds of stimulus projects going on around me. You need to rid your mind of the economics of poop. The voting public obviously has. republicans are being thrown out of office as fast as the election process will allow.
__________________________________

Can you give us some specifics about ANY of these projects "going on around you" ?? Curious, because only 6% of the Stimulus has been spent, so I'm interested in details of all these projects...

I'll wait for your response.....just name one project...one...'Thats going on all around you"
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
hungry1968-16 says:
by ConstantineXI July 31, 2009 11:03 AM EDT
The media bias here is comical. "President urged Congress to pass the stimulus bill". "Urged" is hardly the word. How about "Forced", "rammed through", "posted the bill on Wednesday and voted on it on Thursday before anyone could read it"?







Check out Constantine!!!

Hey thinks the president can "force" congress to do something!!!


Bwaaaa haaaa haaaa haaaa!!!


Man these conservatives are hilarious!!!
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
saturn05 says:
I just don't get it. Every single gov't, auto and financial entity is corrupt. This is insane. I am being expected to not to get a cost of loving raise, no step increases and take 14 days or more of furlough days(without)pay and the above mentioned insitutions can continue destroying our economy while we the employees gst screwed. I am sick and tired of it. Why should I lose money in wages when our government lets states throw away our tax dollars and then I have to pay again by losing money at my job. I have been laid off twice in 10 years and my future is never certain. I don't expect anything written in blood, but to expect me to suffer financially due to the misdeeds of others is not right.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Yes_ABWH_Fan says:
Safety (aka bridges) should come FIRST! Surely there are some bridge projects that can be done more quickly than others, and finite resources with expertise in bridge repair. So focus 100% on each "easy, low-hanging fruit, safety win", then go on to the next one. That will accomplish both goals of safe traffic AND immediate stimulus spending, simultaneously!
reply
Joe_NY_15 replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
No, safety is not first.....appeasing terrorists and sending millions to Hamas controlled Gaza for re-building should come FIRST....didn't you know that ?
See all 28 Comments