CBS News/ May 10, 2011, 7:36 PM

TSA gets flak for baby's KC airport patdown

Less than a month after a public outcry over a 6-year-old's patdown at the New Orleans airport by TSA agents, a photo showing TSA agents examining what appears to be the rear end of a baby at Kansas City International airport has gained a lot of attention.

Twitter user Jacob Jester, who describes himself as an "evangelist, founder of reaching innovations, son of god, husband to kristin, father to jude and cruz, pastor of @theremixlife", posted the photo over the weekend, with the description: "Just saw #tsa agents patting down a little baby at @KCIAirport Pretty sure that's extreme. Check the pic."

In response on its TSA blog, a spokesman wrote: "We reviewed the screening of this family, and found that the child's stroller alarmed during explosives screening. Our officers followed proper current screening procedures by screening the family after the alarm, who by the way were very cooperative and were on the way to their gate in no time. The child in the photo was simply receiving a modified pat-down."

In April, a TSA agent at the New Orleans airport gave a 6-year-old a pat down, even after the little girl said, "I don't want to do this," drawing rage and condemnation across the spectrum. TSA defended itself in a similar manner, saying it was just doing its job.

CBS News correspondent Bob Orr said at the time: "Privacy experts don't like it at all, the critics call it security theater, but we have to say the screener here appears to be doing her job. This patdown happens all the time ... somewhere in America. Whether we like it or not, the truth is it's part of the post-9/11 security."


© 2011 CBS Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved.
207 Comments Add a Comment
linkicon reporticon emailicon
RowanW says:
"Privacy experts don't like it at all, the critics call it security theater, but we have to say the screener here appears to be doing her job."

How is this real news analysis? So what? The TSA screeners are doing their job. Where have we heard that before? "I was just following orders" is the usual way to phrase it though. Why not quit apologizing for this waste of money and resources that is nothing more than a farce and a human rights and constitutional abuse and instead try doing some real analysis of the legality and lack of effectivness - rather than just apologizing for yet another Obama policy? Makes me miss the Bush era (God forbid) just to get some independent analysis.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
lennyring says:
Terrorists have and will continue to use infants as carriers of destructive devices or illegal items. I don't think they enjoy doing that, but they must if you want to fly. If you don't like it, take the train or the bus, or even a boat.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
uktena says:
I urge everyone to take the no fly pledge, as I did. I'll drive to Canada, almost 800 miles before I would depart from a totalitarian oligarchy's airport in the uSA. Mass civil disobedience would be the best policy. But as someone said earlier.

BAH, BAH, BAH line up you little sheep and drop your drawers
reply
retiredgustav replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Good that way I will have more room on the plane!
linkicon reporticon emailicon
John_Rational says:
by Yeziam12 May 12, 2011 5:02 AM EDT
"Brilliant - great minds John, great minds."

I like your style Yeziam12. Your post was about 50% crap, but OH how I love the way you sell it! LOL The military really does have sleep gas that knocks people out for about 12 hours with no after effects. It WOULD work. Currently if a plane is taken over or deviates off course and goes out of radio contact, the policy is to have air force fighters shoot it down. A NORAD controlled self destruct WOULD be quicker and more certain. If we keep the planes we should take these two precautions and get rid of the TSA. In the mean time when TSA gropes you, act like it turns you on and make suggestions. Wink and ask for a phone number. Make them as uncomfortable as they make you.

by mswolfestock May 12, 2011 1:47 PM EDT
""Let tourists ride buses and trains." You freaking arrogant idiot. Explain to me how I would get to Jamaica."

Take AMTRAC to Miami then hop a boat to Jamaica. Actually I was referring to large Jumbo jets not small short hop turbo-jets. So you could still fly from Miami. But really mswolfestock I think a nice Caribbean cruse would do you a world of good! LOL

If you insist on keeping huge unnecessary toys which eat ridiculous amounts of fuel, at least back the notion of increasing alcohol production to the point where we could replace jet fuel with alcohol.

The other thing to remember is that cross country jet air flight makes it virtually impossible to contain a real epidemic. The disease travels too fast that way. The slower speeds of trains and buses make containment possible (and it allows one to enjoy the scenery).
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
rwjacksr says:
Petafiles run amuck at Airport screenings and say " we are just doing our job"
reply
earndoggy replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
You are exactly right! No decent right-thinking person would be doing this job. Pedophiles and sex offenders and other sexual criminals would be the only ones who would do this. It's not post 9/11, that's clear liquids, limited carry one and other screening procedures. Touching, caressing and groping the genitals of children in particular but also of adults is a federal crime. The naked picture scanners violate our fourth amendment rights. These people have GOT to be stopped! Janet Napolitano is a sexual criminal by association for not only allowing this to happen but endorsing it, and so is the head of the TSA. They all need to be thrown in jail.
margroks replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
That would be "pedophiles" if you're referring to people with a perverted interest in children. However, there is no evidence of rampant pedophilia in TSA screeners, just an idiotic policy which looks good while it actually does little to nothing to actually catch real terrorists although it does do the job of humiliating adn angering passengers when they must make the choice between beeing humiliated and groped and being exposed to harmful radiation. No baby has ever had a bomb in its diaper here. The current TSA procedures are outrageous and should be stopped immediately and replaced with the Israeli system which is cheaper adn more effective.
linkicon reporticon emailicon
dontbelievenothing says:
For all of the folks repeating the mantra, it must be working because we've had no bombings recently ... I'd like to introduce you to my latest invention for keeping rabid elephants away.

Stand in the middle of your backyard with your arms raised high. Jump 3 times while whistling the Star Spangled Banner. Now clap your hands behind your back 6 times in rapid succession.

This is absolutely guaranteed to keep all those pesky diseased pachyderms from over-running your yard.

How do I know it works? Well because we haven't had any elephants within a hundreds miles of our house since we started doing it!

I also have this bridge for sale ...
reply
earndoggy replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
I like your style!!
uktena replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
That worked for me too. I've been trying to rid my lawn of elephants since I bought this house and this was the only thing that proved successful. Thanks for the tip!
linkicon reporticon emailicon
uktena says:
What do they call a government that ignores the desires of its population and does whatever it wants?
reply
Blooky replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Because the population lets the government do it!
earndoggy replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
A dictatorship or a communist country.
linkicon reporticon emailicon
mecury69 says:
To all those that support the TSA pat downs and scanners....

"3,000 uniformed behavior detection officers are deployed at about 175 airports and the TSA is expected to spend a total of $1.2 billion on the program over the next five years."

Those of us that have been complaining to the TSA and lampooning the pat downs won. Sorry to break the news to ya. We forced the government to put in security methods that actually WORK and will protect you far better.

Your welcome.
reply
Blooky replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
You trust these guys with your junk, your luggage, your stuff and your dignity?
http://www.nypress.com/article-22424-to-serve-to-protect-andto-steal.html

Supporters of the TSA repeat this:
BAA BAA BAA!
BAA BAA BAA!
BAA BAA BAA!
RowanW replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
How has this made us safer? You count numbers of TSA staff deployed but offer no evidence for its effectiveness. A recent GAO report shows it's inneffective. The TSA can literally punish you for making remarks about the length of lines according to this program. They consider criticism of TSA a terrorist threat. How does the US government stripping us of our right to free speech such as this making us safer? They waste time on babies and people rolling their eyes at ridiculous procedures rather than making us safer.
linkicon reporticon emailicon
francoismariearouet says:
Jawohl, das security Gestapo vas yust doing her job; she vas yust following orders. <<<< Gee, where have we heard THAT before???
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
WeHappyFew says:
Love the comment comparing this to George Orwell's novel, Nineteen Eighty -Four.

Now had this poster actually read this book they would understand that the denouement rests on the principle, not of the loss of civil liberty, but of mind control. It's not enough to force an agenda on you, you must BELIEVE it.

Now to me that sounds more like the sad feckwits that BELIEVED Dick Cheney when they took us to Iraq. BELIEVE that the Iraq war was for anything other than resources and war profiteering. BELIEVE the GOP when the say the only way forward is to let the financial sector tear us a new one again. BELIEVE that under global capitalism a company would ever, could ever, create a US job when if could do so overseas..........I could go on.

2+2=5........as Mr Orwell put it.
reply
RowanW replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Or believe fondling infants really makes us safer just because Obama says so. Or believe that humiliating elderly breast cancer survivors makes us more secure just because Obama's appointees say so.
See all 207 Comments