NEW YORK, Oct. 23, 2007
White House May Halt Anti-Radiation Pills
The Skinny: Plan Born Of Terror Fears Scrapped To Boost Confidence In Nuclear Power
-
The Nuclear Regulatory Commission, which isn't sure that taking anti-radiation pills is really the best way to prevent thyroid cancer in the event of a terrorist attack on a nuclear reactor, was put in charge of the government's pill distribution program in July. (AP / CBS)
-
Interactive Nuclear Disasters Review some of the worst accidents in the history of nuclear power, see how the body responds to radiation exposure and find out if there's a nuclear plant near you.
Is the White House admitting that global warming is scarier than terrorism?
That seems to be the message behind USA Today's report that the Bush administration may scrap a plan to give anti-radiation pills to millions of people, five years after Congress ordered that the tablets be made available to anyone living within 20 miles of a nuclear reactor.
Congress issued the order based on fears that terrorists could attack a nuclear plant. The once-a-day pills protect the thyroid against ingested radioactive iodine by saturating it with harmless potassium iodide, thus guarding against thyroid cancer following radioactive exposure.
Back when the White House was focused on conjuring images of mushroom clouds to sell the Iraq war, it called potassium iodide pills crucial to preventing thyroid cancer. But now that it's looking like we might actually need all those nuclear reactors - plus a whole lot more of them - to power the country, the Nuclear Regulatory Commission is arguing against distributing the pills.
"According to the NRC, the pills may not be the most effective way to prevent cancer and could undermine confidence in the U.S. nuclear plants," the paper reports.
In a sign of where he stands now, President Bush stripped the Health and Human Services of responsibility for the program and turned it over to the NRC in July.
The American Thyroid Association is furious. "If you entrust our kids' health to nuclear engineers instead of doctors," said Peter Crame, a former lawyer with the NRC and thyroid cancer advocate, "you are inviting disaster."
Phone Companies Seeking Immunity Donated To Senator
This morning's installment of Not Illegal But Still Totally Depressing Behavior In Washington comes courtesy of the New York Times.
The paper reports that executives at the two biggest phone companies contributed more than $42,000 to Sen. John Rockefeller IV, D-W.Va., this year while seeking his support for legal immunity for business participating in the National Security Agency eavesdropping.
The contributions come from "a Who's Who of executives" at AT&T and Verizon, starting with the chief executives and including at least 50 executives and lawyers, according to campaign finance reports.
Rockefeller, chairman of the Senate Intelligence Committee, emerged last week as the most important supporter of immunity in devising a compromise plan with Senate Republicans and the Bush administration, the paper reports.
A measure approved by the committee on Thursday would add restrictions on the eavesdropping and extent retroactive immunity to carriers that participated in it. The companies face big lawsuits from customers who say their privacy was violated when the telecoms helped the government snoop on them without warrants.
Rockefeller denies that the sudden surge in telecom contributions swayed his opinion. One of his supporters backs him up by pointing out the obvious: the guy's name is John D. Rockefeller IV.
"That these phone companies are going to focus their lobbying efforts where their business interests are is no revelation," said Matt Bennett, vice president for Third Way, a moderate Democraticy policy group that has supported immunity for phone carriers. "That's the standard Washington way of doing business. But you're not going to buy a Rockefeller."
Incoming!
The search continued yesterday for one of two pieces of luggage that vanished on Sunday after a cargo door on an airplane apparently opened in flight, the
Shortly after a plane took off from Chicago's Midway Airport, its controls indicated an air pressure problem, according to a spokeswoman for Atlantic Southeast Airlines, which operated the Delta flight to Atlanta.
The plane circled back and landed. None of the 70 passengers were injured, but the ground crew found a cargo door open. The Federal Aviation Administration said it was investigating the case.
A breakthrough happened on Monday when an employee at a railroad switching yard less than a mile from the airport found one of the missing pieces, a garment bag, on the ground.
The Times, at least, couldn't find anybody who'd ever heard of luggage falling out of a flying plane before. The airline spokeswoman said the airline was thankful that "no one has been hurt during this very rare incident."
But how can she be sure? The second bag, the Times reports, remains at large.
A NOTE TO READERS: The Skinny is available via e-mail. Click here and follow the directions to register to receive it in your inbox each weekday morning.
©MMVII, CBS Broadcasting Inc. All Rights Reserved.
More From CBS Evening News: The Skinny
Add a Comment See all 75 Comments
- Nop, she couldn''t make me vote for anyone... I don''t trust her any longer... but there are people out there who are easily influenced...
- Reply to this comment
- Concerning iodide pills:
The biggest problem with them is they have a very small window of opportunity to be used. Also, they are not safe is used improperly.
Radioactive Iodine is a fairly short lived byproduct of nuclear fission. In a Pressurized Water reactor the following would have to occur for the public health to be threatened:
Large scale fuel cladding failure (core meltdown).
Failure of the Reactor Coolant System: Three Mile Island had a valve stuck open that eventually overcame the emergency relief storage system and breached the sealed system; releasing lots of water and iodine into the containment building.
Containment building being breached before the iodine is neutralized. Containment spray systems are designed to neutralize any iodine that may escape the RCS system.
If all of that fails - then radioactive iodine will be vented to that atmosphere and drift downwind.
If peoples thyroid are not saturated with iodine before the iodine plume gets there they will absorb some of the radioactive iodine.
People would need to take the iodine pill some hours before the breach of the containment building to protect their thyroid (it takes time to absorb the iodine). Taking it too late does not help. Due to the dose in the pills it is not safe to take them on a consistent basis.
There is only a short period of time to take them in even the best scenarios.
I support these pills being available; and clear instructions on when to take them. - Reply to this comment
- Yup, we''ll need those reactors, bad.
Quote:
Lead will stop radiation so if you want anti-radiation protection surround your self with walmart toys from China...
Posted by Toolmangler at 03:36 PM : Oct 23, 2007
Thanks, Tool. You managed to disrupt my morning blood pressure rise as I cruised the info-channels with a little laughter.
I appreciate it (even if the underlying truths are both wearing and worrisome).
Re: Phone companies. Although I have nothing to hide, their actions disturb me on general principles. Thankfully, due to the number of alternatives the ''net provides I could express my displeasure with my wallet: Don''t use them.
Re: Luggage - I''m not surprised nobody has found the rest of it. I used to like flying into Midway because you could actually land there instead of circling over O''Hare for hours, but I never wanted to linger in the neighborhood... - Reply to this comment
- Potassium iodide has been used for emergencies like Chernobyl, where the thyroid absorbs the iodine to its'' limit, and is therefore unable to absorb radioactive iodine.
The fact is that the dissemination of information about stockpiling the pills was part of Bush''s terror campaign, to make the suckers out there think that fictional "terrorists" out there somewhere in the Middle East were "coming to get you", armed with nuclear waste. Now that the scare has worked and is now counter productive to the interests of the power companies'' wish to go nuclear, they backtrack and say "Oops, we scared the suckers too much, lets back it off a little".
You know, it is even more insulting that they even spend effort to try to scare people, because they are going to do whatever corruption they set their little brains to regardless. - Reply to this comment
- When certain kinds of information comes from the government you just have to learn to "eat the grass" and "leave the briers alone". However since some of the government warnings of us being attacked by terrorists with something radioactive say "when" and not "if", I see no reason to doubt them. And for the government to stop making these iodine pills because of some offense to the nuclear power plant plans sure doesn''t make a lot of common sense to me. Go ahead and build your plants! I think it better to put them underground though if something bad did happen. Anything to get our country self sufficient from the Middle East would be fine and dandy with me. These far left environmentalists are gonna have to come to the middle wear common sense dwells and things get done with a little peace.
- Reply to this comment
- Hi, Tool.
- Reply to this comment
- Lead will stop radiation so if you want anti-radiation protection surround your self with walmart toys from China...
- Reply to this comment
- WHEN COKES CAME IN 6 OZ BOTTLES THEY COST 5 CENTS AND A 2 CENT DEPOSIT ON THE BOTTLE!
NOW CHECK OUT THE PRICE OF COKE AND YOU WILL SEE THAT WE HAVE BEEN IN INFLATION SINCE THE END OF WW2.
AND IT CONTINUES!
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Posted by prairiefox1 at 11:17 AM : Oct 23, 2007
+ report abuse
CAPS LOCK FOR IS CRUISE CONTROL FOR COOL WOOT - Reply to this comment
- "Is the White House admitting that global warming is scarier than terrorism?"
Jumping to a conclusion, aren''t you? Shame on CBS for trivializing two serious concerns to fit some stupid agenda. - Reply to this comment
- Radiation affects the ENTIRE body not just the thyroid! getting thyroid cancer is the LEAST of the worry, the immediate worry is radiation sickness that will result in death within days as the body''s systems begin to break down.
- Reply to this comment
- Once again, the media have it wrong. Potassium iodide tablets are not "anti-radiation" pills.
- Reply to this comment
- Just par for the course with this administration.
- Reply to this comment
- To lawyertom and others regarding the "nuke pill"--go get some education on the matter that isn''t poluted by folks who aren''t educated in nuclear engineering. There is so much misinformation out there that is generated by fear, not facts. As I work in a nuclear power plant I can say that those pills and that whole program is nothing but a placebo to give people to give them a "warm fuzzy." If a nuclear accident occurred, those pills would only delay your death by maybe a couple of hours, probably not even that. The scrapping of that program is a good idea, why spend money in giving people a false hope, where none would exist?
- Reply to this comment
- WHEN COKES CAME IN 6 OZ BOTTLES THEY COST 5 CENTS AND A 2 CENT DEPOSIT ON THE BOTTLE!
NOW CHECK OUT THE PRICE OF COKE AND YOU WILL SEE THAT WE HAVE BEEN IN INFLATION SINCE THE END OF WW2.
AND IT CONTINUES! - Reply to this comment
- jack3213
THE CUNNING WILL SURVIVE! - Reply to this comment
- Having worked many years in a nuclear industry, let me explain something. The pills will do NOTHING to prevent radiation exposure. They are only a way of protecting the thyroid, somewhat. A radiation spill or meltdown or catastrophic failure will be another story intirely. We are bombarded with radiation every day from the sun. Imagine a massive sunburn cooking you all the way through your body, slowly over days. Archive photos from the Chernobyl spill in Russia to see wht could happen
- Reply to this comment
- "True to form, you puke liberals can bash everybody but one of your own. Not one word about Rockefeller. We "repugs" can bash Bush, I think he and Idiot when it come to Illegals, oops, sorry you guys want them here as a voter base. I say build the wall North and South. No this isn''''t East Germany, we''''er not keeping anybody in, we''''er keeping them out."
Posted by gunnerv1 at 10:57 AM : Oct 23, 2007
Sorry, but I don''t understand the point you are trying to make. - Reply to this comment
- when cokes came in 6 fl oz sizes in glass bottles, some of the guys would drop them out of the plane they sounded like a small bomb coming down...scaring the xxxx out of civilans.....
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Posted by vampire1288 at 10:07 AM : Oct 23, 2007
ACTUALLY IT WAS SELTZER BOTTLES!
GET YOUR FACTS STRAIGHT! - Reply to this comment
- True to form, you puke liberals can bash everybody but one of your own. Not one word about Rockefeller. We "repugs" can bash Bush, I think he and Idiot when it come to Illegals, oops, sorry you guys want them here as a voter base. I say build the wall North and South. No this isn''t East Germany, we''er not keeping anybody in, we''er keeping them out.
- Reply to this comment
- "You have got to be kidding...We have had a Republican president since 2000. What has that bought us, 2 trillion in additional debt, the debt ceiling raised 4 times in 5 years, virtual destruction of the military, and in the latest Gallup poll 73% dissatisfied with the way things are going in the country. You may believe "more of the same" is going to turn things around but a vast majority of voters know otherwise." Posted by jon_mccain
I fully agree with you; however I would feel more confident if the Dems we voted in last time would grow collective backbones and do the jobs for which they were elected. - Reply to this comment
